Message ID | 20231120205614.46350-3-ahmed.zaki@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | Support symmetric-xor RSS hash | expand |
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:56:09 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote: > + * @data: Extension for the RSS hash function. Valid values are one of the > + * %RXH_HFUNC_*. @data is way too generic. Can we call this key_xfrm? key_preproc? > +/* RSS hash function data > + * XOR the corresponding source and destination fields of each specified > + * protocol. Both copies of the XOR'ed fields are fed into the RSS and RXHASH > + * calculation. > + */ > +#define RXH_HFUNC_SYM_XOR (1 << 0) We need to mention somewhere that sym-xor is unsafe, per Alex's comments. > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h You need to fill in the details in: Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst and Documentation/netlink/specs/ethtool.yaml Last but not least please keep the field check you moved to the drivers in the core. Nobody will remember to check that other drivers added the check as well.
On 22/11/2023 1:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Last but not least please keep the field check you moved to the drivers > in the core. Nobody will remember to check that other drivers added the > check as well. The wording of this sentence is a bit confusing, so I might be repeating what you already said, but this patchset needs to make sure that drivers that do not support the new symmetric flag return an error instead of silently ignoring it.
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:33:04 +0200 Gal Pressman wrote: > On 22/11/2023 1:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Last but not least please keep the field check you moved to the drivers > > in the core. Nobody will remember to check that other drivers added the > > check as well. > > The wording of this sentence is a bit confusing, so I might be repeating > what you already said, but this patchset needs to make sure that drivers > that do not support the new symmetric flag return an error instead of > silently ignoring it. Ah, good point! That, too. I was referring to what changed in v5, from the change long: v5: move sanity checks from ethtool/ioctl.c to ice's and iavf's rxfnc drivers entries (patches 5 and 6).
On 2023-11-21 16:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:56:09 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote: >> + * @data: Extension for the RSS hash function. Valid values are one of the >> + * %RXH_HFUNC_*. > > @data is way too generic. Can we call this key_xfrm? key_preproc? We manipulate the "input data" (protocol fields) not the key. I will rename to "input_xfrm". > >> +/* RSS hash function data >> + * XOR the corresponding source and destination fields of each specified >> + * protocol. Both copies of the XOR'ed fields are fed into the RSS and RXHASH >> + * calculation. >> + */ >> +#define RXH_HFUNC_SYM_XOR (1 << 0) > > We need to mention somewhere that sym-xor is unsafe, per Alex's > comments. I already added the following in Documentation/networking/scaling.rst: "The Symmetric-XOR" is a type of RSS algorithms that achieves this hash symmetry by XORing the input source and destination fields of the IP and/or L4 protocols. This, however, results in reduced input entropy and could potentially be exploited." Or do you mean add it also to "uapi/linux/ethtool.h" ? Will do the rest in the next version.
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:21:47 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote: > On 2023-11-21 16:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:56:09 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote: > >> + * @data: Extension for the RSS hash function. Valid values are one of the > >> + * %RXH_HFUNC_*. > > > > @data is way too generic. Can we call this key_xfrm? key_preproc? > > We manipulate the "input data" (protocol fields) not the key. I will > rename to "input_xfrm". Ugh, right! > >> +/* RSS hash function data > >> + * XOR the corresponding source and destination fields of each specified > >> + * protocol. Both copies of the XOR'ed fields are fed into the RSS and RXHASH > >> + * calculation. > >> + */ > >> +#define RXH_HFUNC_SYM_XOR (1 << 0) > > > > We need to mention somewhere that sym-xor is unsafe, per Alex's > > comments. > > I already added the following in Documentation/networking/scaling.rst: > > "The Symmetric-XOR" is a type of RSS algorithms that achieves this hash > symmetry by XORing the input source and destination fields of the IP > and/or L4 protocols. This, however, results in reduced input entropy and > could potentially be exploited." > > Or do you mean add it also to "uapi/linux/ethtool.h" ? Yes, a short mention in a comment next to the define. There's a good chance person looking at this will not notice the documentation in scaling.
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/scaling.rst b/Documentation/networking/scaling.rst index 03ae19a689fc..4eb50bcb9d42 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/scaling.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/scaling.rst @@ -44,6 +44,21 @@ by masking out the low order seven bits of the computed hash for the packet (usually a Toeplitz hash), taking this number as a key into the indirection table and reading the corresponding value. +Some NICs support symmetric RSS hashing where, if the IP (source address, +destination address) and TCP/UDP (source port, destination port) tuples +are swapped, the computed hash is the same. This is beneficial in some +applications that monitor TCP/IP flows (IDS, firewalls, ...etc) and need +both directions of the flow to land on the same Rx queue (and CPU). The +"Symmetric-XOR" is a type of RSS algorithms that achieves this hash +symmetry by XORing the input source and destination fields of the IP +and/or L4 protocols. This, however, results in reduced input entropy and +could potentially be exploited. Specifically, the algorithm XORs the input +as follows:: + + # (SRC_IP ^ DST_IP, SRC_IP ^ DST_IP, SRC_PORT ^ DST_PORT, SRC_PORT ^ DST_PORT) + +The result is then fed to the underlying RSS algorithm. + Some advanced NICs allow steering packets to queues based on programmable filters. For example, webserver bound TCP port 80 packets can be directed to their own receive queue. Such “n-tuple” filters can diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h index f7fba0dc87e5..5d629b7b2d55 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h @@ -1266,6 +1266,8 @@ struct ethtool_rxfh_indir { * hardware hash key. * @hfunc: Defines the current RSS hash function used by HW (or to be set to). * Valid values are one of the %ETH_RSS_HASH_*. + * @data: Extension for the RSS hash function. Valid values are one of the + * %RXH_HFUNC_*. * @rsvd8: Reserved for future use; see the note on reserved space. * @rsvd32: Reserved for future use; see the note on reserved space. * @rss_config: RX ring/queue index for each hash value i.e., indirection table @@ -1285,7 +1287,8 @@ struct ethtool_rxfh { __u32 indir_size; __u32 key_size; __u8 hfunc; - __u8 rsvd8[3]; + __u8 data; + __u8 rsvd8[2]; __u32 rsvd32; __u32 rss_config[]; }; @@ -1992,6 +1995,13 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex) #define WOL_MODE_COUNT 8 +/* RSS hash function data + * XOR the corresponding source and destination fields of each specified + * protocol. Both copies of the XOR'ed fields are fed into the RSS and RXHASH + * calculation. + */ +#define RXH_HFUNC_SYM_XOR (1 << 0) + /* L2-L4 network traffic flow types */ #define TCP_V4_FLOW 0x01 /* hash or spec (tcp_ip4_spec) */ #define UDP_V4_FLOW 0x02 /* hash or spec (udp_ip4_spec) */ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h index 73e2c10dc2cc..638fa7f0682f 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h @@ -908,6 +908,7 @@ enum { ETHTOOL_A_RSS_HFUNC, /* u32 */ ETHTOOL_A_RSS_INDIR, /* binary */ ETHTOOL_A_RSS_HKEY, /* binary */ + ETHTOOL_A_RSS_HFUNC_DATA, /* u32 */ __ETHTOOL_A_RSS_CNT, ETHTOOL_A_RSS_MAX = (__ETHTOOL_A_RSS_CNT - 1), diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c index f4e6067d200f..98726d1bef77 100644 --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, user_key_size = rxfh.key_size; /* Check that reserved fields are 0 for now */ - if (rxfh.rsvd8[0] || rxfh.rsvd8[1] || rxfh.rsvd8[2] || rxfh.rsvd32) + if (rxfh.rsvd8[0] || rxfh.rsvd8[1] || rxfh.rsvd32) return -EINVAL; /* Most drivers don't handle rss_context, check it's 0 as well */ if (rxfh.rss_context && !ops->get_rxfh_context) @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_set_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, return -EFAULT; /* Check that reserved fields are 0 for now */ - if (rxfh.rsvd8[0] || rxfh.rsvd8[1] || rxfh.rsvd8[2] || rxfh.rsvd32) + if (rxfh.rsvd8[0] || rxfh.rsvd8[1] || rxfh.rsvd32) return -EINVAL; /* Most drivers don't handle rss_context, check it's 0 as well */ if (rxfh.rss_context && !ops->set_rxfh_context) diff --git a/net/ethtool/rss.c b/net/ethtool/rss.c index 2d11f881810d..99ee061e6582 100644 --- a/net/ethtool/rss.c +++ b/net/ethtool/rss.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct rss_reply_data { u32 indir_size; u32 hkey_size; u32 hfunc; + u32 hfunc_data; u32 *indir_table; u8 *hkey; }; @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ rss_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base, goto out_ops; data->hfunc = rxfh.hfunc; + data->hfunc_data = rxfh.data; out_ops: ethnl_ops_complete(dev); return ret; @@ -110,6 +112,7 @@ rss_reply_size(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base, int len; len = nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) + /* _RSS_HFUNC */ + nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) + /* _RSS_HFUNC_DATA */ nla_total_size(sizeof(u32) * data->indir_size) + /* _RSS_INDIR */ nla_total_size(data->hkey_size); /* _RSS_HKEY */ @@ -124,6 +127,8 @@ rss_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base, if ((data->hfunc && nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RSS_HFUNC, data->hfunc)) || + (data->hfunc_data && + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RSS_HFUNC_DATA, data->hfunc_data)) || (data->indir_size && nla_put(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RSS_INDIR, sizeof(u32) * data->indir_size, data->indir_table)) ||