mbox series

[V2,0/3] staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs

Message ID 20231029124837.119832-1-wahrenst@gmx.net (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs | expand

Message

Stefan Wahren Oct. 29, 2023, 12:48 p.m. UTC 
Hello,

since recent discussion raised the question about the future of debugfs
for vchiq [1], i want to submit this cleanup patch series as part of the
discussion and a small Halloween present ;-)

Best regards

Changes in V2:
- rebase on top of current staging-next
- address suggestion from Laurent Pinchart in patch 1
- fix checkpatch issue (too long line) in patch 2

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ea529c2-3da6-47df-9b09-28d4ab36c4ef@kadam.mountain/T/

Stefan Wahren (3):
  staging: vchiq_core: Make vchiq_dump_service_state static
  staging: vchiq_core: Shorten bulk TX/RX pending dump
  staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs

 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           |  94 ++----
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h           |   7 -
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c          | 274 +++++++-----------
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h          |  16 +-
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.c       |  10 +
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c           |  21 --
 6 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1

Comments

Stefan Wahren Nov. 22, 2023, 12:17 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Greg,

Am 29.10.23 um 13:48 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> Hello,
>
> since recent discussion raised the question about the future of debugfs
> for vchiq [1], i want to submit this cleanup patch series as part of the
> discussion and a small Halloween present ;-)
>
> Best regards
>
> Changes in V2:
> - rebase on top of current staging-next
> - address suggestion from Laurent Pinchart in patch 1
> - fix checkpatch issue (too long line) in patch 2
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ea529c2-3da6-47df-9b09-28d4ab36c4ef@kadam.mountain/T/
>
> Stefan Wahren (3):
>    staging: vchiq_core: Make vchiq_dump_service_state static
>    staging: vchiq_core: Shorten bulk TX/RX pending dump
>    staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs

should i resend incl. the received Reviewed-by tags?

>
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           |  94 ++----
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h           |   7 -
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c          | 274 +++++++-----------
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h          |  16 +-
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.c       |  10 +
>   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c           |  21 --
>   6 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Greg Kroah-Hartman Nov. 22, 2023, 12:23 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:17:07PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Am 29.10.23 um 13:48 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > since recent discussion raised the question about the future of debugfs
> > for vchiq [1], i want to submit this cleanup patch series as part of the
> > discussion and a small Halloween present ;-)
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Changes in V2:
> > - rebase on top of current staging-next
> > - address suggestion from Laurent Pinchart in patch 1
> > - fix checkpatch issue (too long line) in patch 2
> > 
> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ea529c2-3da6-47df-9b09-28d4ab36c4ef@kadam.mountain/T/
> > 
> > Stefan Wahren (3):
> >    staging: vchiq_core: Make vchiq_dump_service_state static
> >    staging: vchiq_core: Shorten bulk TX/RX pending dump
> >    staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs
> 
> should i resend incl. the received Reviewed-by tags?

No, just wait for me to catch up with staging patches.  Should be a week
or so...

tjhanks,

greg k-h