diff mbox series

[v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout

Message ID 20231109053953.3863664-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout | expand

Commit Message

Arseniy Krasnov Nov. 9, 2023, 5:39 a.m. UTC
In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Viacheslav Nov. 9, 2023, 8:06 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi!

On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>  	__le64 *info;
>  	int i, count;
>  
> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
Seems something wrong with your logic here.
I think this code should most likely look like this:

for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
    info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
    *info |= oob_buf[count];
    if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
      *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
}


> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>  	__le64 *info;
>  	int i, count;
>  
> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
And there:

for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
    info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
    oob_buf[count] = *info;
    if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
        oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
}


This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.

--
Viacheslav Bocharov
Arseniy Krasnov Nov. 9, 2023, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello, thanks for review!

On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>  	__le64 *info;
>>  	int i, count;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> 
> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> }

For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:

AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB

where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.

WDYT?

Thanks, Arseniy

> 
> 
>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>  	__le64 *info;
>>  	int i, count;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> And there:
> 
> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> }
> 
> 
> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> 
> --
> Viacheslav Bocharov
>
Arseniy Krasnov Nov. 24, 2023, 7:50 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping

Thanks, Arseniy


On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> Hello, thanks for review!
> 
> On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
>>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>>  	__le64 *info;
>>>  	int i, count;
>>>  
>>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
>>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
>> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
>> I think this code should most likely look like this:
>>
>> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
>>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
>> }
> 
> For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> 
> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> 
> where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
>>
>>
>>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>>  	__le64 *info;
>>>  	int i, count;
>>>  
>>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
>>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
>> And there:
>>
>> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
>>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
>> }
>>
>>
>> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
>>
>> --
>> Viacheslav Bocharov
>>
Miquel Raynal Nov. 24, 2023, 9:06 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Arseniy,

avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:

> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping

I'm waiting for Viacheslav.

> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
> 
> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hello, thanks for review!
> > 
> > On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:  
> >>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> >>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;  
> >> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> >> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> }  
> > 
> > For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> > 
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > 
> > where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> > we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> > increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks, Arseniy
> >   
> >>
> >>  
> >>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;  
> >> And there:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Viacheslav Bocharov
> >>  


Thanks,
Miquèl
Viacheslav Nov. 24, 2023, 10:14 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi, Miquel!

24/11/2023 12.06, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Arseniy,
> 
> avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:
> 
>> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping
> 
> I'm waiting for Viacheslav.

We discussed this update with Arseniy. My suggestion was based on the 
difference in patch from the algorithms used in amlogic u-boot.  Arseniy 
claims that everything works for them.

Unfortunately, I don't have the devices available to test this.

> 
>>
>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>>
>> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> Hello, thanks for review!
>>>
>>> On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
>>>>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>>>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>>>>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>>>>   	__le64 *info;
>>>>>   	int i, count;
>>>>>   
>>>>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>>>>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>>>>   		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>>>   		*info |= oob_buf[count];
>>>>>   		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
>>>> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
>>>> I think this code should most likely look like this:
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>>>>      info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>>      *info |= oob_buf[count];
>>>>      if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>>>>        *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
>>>
>>> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
>>> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
>>> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
>>> AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
>>>
>>> where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
>>> we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
>>> increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>>    
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>>>>>   	__le64 *info;
>>>>>   	int i, count;
>>>>>   
>>>>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>>>>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>>>>>   		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>>>   		oob_buf[count] = *info;
>>>>>   		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
>>>> And there:
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
>>>>      info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>>>>      oob_buf[count] = *info;
>>>>      if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
>>>>          oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Viacheslav Bocharov
>>>>   
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

--
Viacheslav Bocharov
Miquel Raynal Nov. 30, 2023, 10:36 a.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 05:39:53 UTC, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next, thanks.

Miquel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@  static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
 	__le64 *info;
 	int i, count;
 
-	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
+	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
 		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
 		*info |= oob_buf[count];
 		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@  static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
 	__le64 *info;
 	int i, count;
 
-	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
+	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
 		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
 		oob_buf[count] = *info;
 		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;