Message ID | 20231129121841.253223-1-vignesh.raman@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm: ci: fixes | expand |
Hi Vignesh, On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@collabora.com> wrote: > Expected driver for mt8173 is "mediatek" and for mt8183 > it is "panfrost". Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER to 'mediatek' as > the expected driver for mt8173. Actually, for mt8183 it's both. And for mt8173 it will probably be mediatek+pvr pretty soon. Each of these SoCs (like most Arm devices) have a separate display controller and GPU, with different drivers for each. They'll run different tests with different xfails. So we should figure out a way to support igt running for both devices on the one system. Cheers, Daniel
Hi Daniel, On 29/11/23 18:52, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Vignesh, > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@collabora.com> wrote: >> Expected driver for mt8173 is "mediatek" and for mt8183 >> it is "panfrost". Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER to 'mediatek' as >> the expected driver for mt8173. > > Actually, for mt8183 it's both. And for mt8173 it will probably be > mediatek+pvr pretty soon. Each of these SoCs (like most Arm devices) > have a separate display controller and GPU, with different drivers for > each. They'll run different tests with different xfails. So we should > figure out a way to support igt running for both devices on the one > system. Agree. Will work on separate patch to test both the drivers for these devices. Regards, Vignesh