diff mbox series

[1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix frequency truncation by promoting multiplier to u64

Message ID 20231130204343.503076-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix frequency truncation by promoting multiplier to u64 | expand

Commit Message

Sudeep Holla Nov. 30, 2023, 8:43 p.m. UTC
Fix the frequency truncation for all values equal to or greater 4GHz by
updating the multiplier 'mult_factor' to u64 type. It is also possible
that the multiplier itself can be greater than or equal to 2^32. So we need
to also fix the equation computing the value of the multiplier.

Fixes: a9e3fbfaa0ff ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol")
Reported-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0

Comments

Sudeep Holla Dec. 1, 2023, 2:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Fix the frequency truncation for all values equal to or greater 4GHz by
> updating the multiplier 'mult_factor' to u64 type. It is also possible
> that the multiplier itself can be greater than or equal to 2^32. So we need
> to also fix the equation computing the value of the multiplier.
> 
> Fixes: a9e3fbfaa0ff ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol")
> Reported-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index 81dd5c5e5533..8ce449922e55 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ struct perf_dom_info {
>  	u32 opp_count;
>  	u32 sustained_freq_khz;
>  	u32 sustained_perf_level;
> -	u32 mult_factor;
> +	u64 mult_factor;

I have now changed this to unsigned long instead of u64 to fix the 32-bit
build failure[1].
Cristian Marussi Dec. 1, 2023, 4:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:39:35PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Fix the frequency truncation for all values equal to or greater 4GHz by
> > updating the multiplier 'mult_factor' to u64 type. It is also possible
> > that the multiplier itself can be greater than or equal to 2^32. So we need
> > to also fix the equation computing the value of the multiplier.
> > 
> > Fixes: a9e3fbfaa0ff ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol")
> > Reported-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> > Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > index 81dd5c5e5533..8ce449922e55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ struct perf_dom_info {
> >  	u32 opp_count;
> >  	u32 sustained_freq_khz;
> >  	u32 sustained_perf_level;
> > -	u32 mult_factor;
> > +	u64 mult_factor;
> 
> I have now changed this to unsigned long instead of u64 to fix the 32-bit
> build failure[1].

Right, I was caught a few times too by this kind of failures on v7 :D

... but this 32bit issue makes me wonder what to do in such a case...

...I mean, on 32bit if the calculated freq oveflows, there is just
nothing we can do on v7 without overcomplicating the code...but I suppose
it is unplausible to have such high freq on a v7... as a palliative I can
only think of some sort of overflow check (only on v7) that could trigger
a warning ... but it is hardly worth the effort probably..

Thanks,
Cristian
Sudeep Holla Dec. 1, 2023, 4:41 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 04:17:56PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:39:35PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Fix the frequency truncation for all values equal to or greater 4GHz by
> > > updating the multiplier 'mult_factor' to u64 type. It is also possible
> > > that the multiplier itself can be greater than or equal to 2^32. So we need
> > > to also fix the equation computing the value of the multiplier.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: a9e3fbfaa0ff ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol")
> > > Reported-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> > > Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > index 81dd5c5e5533..8ce449922e55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ struct perf_dom_info {
> > >  	u32 opp_count;
> > >  	u32 sustained_freq_khz;
> > >  	u32 sustained_perf_level;
> > > -	u32 mult_factor;
> > > +	u64 mult_factor;
> > 
> > I have now changed this to unsigned long instead of u64 to fix the 32-bit
> > build failure[1].
> 
> Right, I was caught a few times too by this kind of failures on v7 :D
>


Sudeep Holla Dec. 4, 2023, 1:46 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:43:42 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Fix the frequency truncation for all values equal to or greater 4GHz by
> updating the multiplier 'mult_factor' to u64 type. It is also possible
> that the multiplier itself can be greater than or equal to 2^32. So we need
> to also fix the equation computing the value of the multiplier.
>

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/fixes), thanks!

[1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix frequency truncation by promoting multiplier to u64
      (Applied changing u64 to unsigned long to fix armv7 build)
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/8e3c98d9187e
[2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix possible frequency truncation when using level indexing mode
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/77f5032e94f2
--
Regards,
Sudeep
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index 81dd5c5e5533..8ce449922e55 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@  struct perf_dom_info {
 	u32 opp_count;
 	u32 sustained_freq_khz;
 	u32 sustained_perf_level;
-	u32 mult_factor;
+	u64 mult_factor;
 	struct scmi_perf_domain_info info;
 	struct scmi_opp opp[MAX_OPPS];
 	struct scmi_fc_info *fc_info;
@@ -273,8 +273,8 @@  scmi_perf_domain_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 			dom_info->mult_factor =	1000;
 		else
 			dom_info->mult_factor =
-					(dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000) /
-					dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
+					(dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000UL)
+					/ dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
 		strscpy(dom_info->info.name, attr->name,
 			SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE);
 	}