Message ID | 20231206164416.543503-6-pctammela@mojatatu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | net/sched: conditional notification of events for cls and act | expand |
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:44:16PM -0300, Pedro Tammela wrote: > As of today tc-filter/chain events are unconditionally built and sent to > RTNLGRP_TC. As with the introduction of rtnl_notify_needed we can check > before-hand if they are really needed. This will help to alleviate > system pressure when filters are concurrently added without the rtnl > lock as in tc-flower. > > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com> Thanks Pedro, my comment below notwithstanding, this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> > --- > net/sched/cls_api.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c > index 1976bd163986..123185907ebd 100644 > --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c > +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c > @@ -2053,6 +2053,9 @@ static int tfilter_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, > u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; > int err = 0; > > + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) I don't feel strongly about this, but as the above condition appears 3 times in this patch, perhaps it could be a helper? > + return 0; > + > skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!skb) > return -ENOBUFS; > @@ -2082,6 +2085,9 @@ static int tfilter_del_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, > u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; > int err; > > + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) > + return tp->ops->delete(tp, fh, last, rtnl_held, extack); > + > skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!skb) > return -ENOBUFS; > @@ -2906,6 +2912,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify(struct tcf_chain *chain, struct sk_buff *oskb, > struct sk_buff *skb; > int err = 0; > > + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) > + return 0; > + > skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!skb) > return -ENOBUFS; > @@ -2935,6 +2944,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify_delete(const struct tcf_proto_ops *tmplt_ops, > struct net *net = block->net; > struct sk_buff *skb; > > + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) > + return 0; > + > skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!skb) > return -ENOBUFS; > -- > 2.40.1 >
On 07/12/2023 17:59, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:44:16PM -0300, Pedro Tammela wrote: >> As of today tc-filter/chain events are unconditionally built and sent to >> RTNLGRP_TC. As with the introduction of rtnl_notify_needed we can check >> before-hand if they are really needed. This will help to alleviate >> system pressure when filters are concurrently added without the rtnl >> lock as in tc-flower. >> >> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> >> Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com> > > Thanks Pedro, > > my comment below notwithstanding, this looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> > >> --- >> net/sched/cls_api.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c >> index 1976bd163986..123185907ebd 100644 >> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c >> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c >> @@ -2053,6 +2053,9 @@ static int tfilter_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, >> u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; >> int err = 0; >> >> + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) > > I don't feel strongly about this, but > as the above condition appears 3 times in this patch, > perhaps it could be a helper? I noticed that some of these functions will never call with unicast set to true (delete routines). So I will append a patch that removes it. So this pattern will hopefully bet not repeating enough for a macro :) > >> + return 0; >> + >> skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!skb) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> @@ -2082,6 +2085,9 @@ static int tfilter_del_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, >> u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; >> int err; >> >> + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) >> + return tp->ops->delete(tp, fh, last, rtnl_held, extack); >> + >> skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!skb) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> @@ -2906,6 +2912,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify(struct tcf_chain *chain, struct sk_buff *oskb, >> struct sk_buff *skb; >> int err = 0; >> >> + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) >> + return 0; >> + >> skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!skb) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> @@ -2935,6 +2944,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify_delete(const struct tcf_proto_ops *tmplt_ops, >> struct net *net = block->net; >> struct sk_buff *skb; >> >> + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) >> + return 0; >> + >> skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!skb) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> -- >> 2.40.1 >>
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index 1976bd163986..123185907ebd 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c @@ -2053,6 +2053,9 @@ static int tfilter_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; int err = 0; + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) + return 0; + skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!skb) return -ENOBUFS; @@ -2082,6 +2085,9 @@ static int tfilter_del_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oskb, u32 portid = oskb ? NETLINK_CB(oskb).portid : 0; int err; + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, n->nlmsg_flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) + return tp->ops->delete(tp, fh, last, rtnl_held, extack); + skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!skb) return -ENOBUFS; @@ -2906,6 +2912,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify(struct tcf_chain *chain, struct sk_buff *oskb, struct sk_buff *skb; int err = 0; + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) + return 0; + skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!skb) return -ENOBUFS; @@ -2935,6 +2944,9 @@ static int tc_chain_notify_delete(const struct tcf_proto_ops *tmplt_ops, struct net *net = block->net; struct sk_buff *skb; + if (!unicast && !rtnl_notify_needed(net, flags, RTNLGRP_TC)) + return 0; + skb = alloc_skb(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!skb) return -ENOBUFS;