[v4,15/17] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Add Rockchip RK3588

Commit Message

Andy Yan Dec. 7, 2023, 8:02 a.m. UTC

From: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>

Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>

---

Changes in v4:
- Add const for rockchip,rk3588-iommu compatible

 .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml     | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Heiko Stuebner Dec. 8, 2023, 4:29 p.m. UTC | #1

Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2023, 09:02:35 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> From: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
> 
> Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[e-mail]>

In the next iteration, please split this out into a separate patch and send
it to the iommu+dt maintainers.

Supporting the iommus on rk3588 can be realized separately and the
patch needs to go through a separate tree anyway.


Thanks
Heiko

Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 8, 2023, 5:47 p.m. UTC | #2

On 07/12/2023 09:02, Andy Yan wrote:
> From: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
> 
> Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[e-mail]>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Andy Yan Dec. 9, 2023, 1:26 a.m. UTC | #3

Hi Heiko:

On 12/9/23 00:29, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2023, 09:02:35 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
>> From: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[e-mail]>
> 
> In the next iteration, please split this out into a separate patch and send
> it to the iommu+dt maintainers.
> 
> Supporting the iommus on rk3588 can be realized separately and the
> patch needs to go through a separate tree anyway.

Okay, I will split this patch out of this vop2 series, does this mean that
I also need to split out the iommu dt node as a separate patch from current
PATCH16 ?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Heiko
> 
> 
>

Heiko Stuebner Dec. 9, 2023, 2:04 p.m. UTC | #4

Hi Andy,

Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2023, 02:26:25 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> Hi Heiko:
> 
> On 12/9/23 00:29, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2023, 09:02:35 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> >> From: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
> >>
> >> Add a Rockchip RK3588 compatible
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[e-mail]>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[e-mail]>
> > 
> > In the next iteration, please split this out into a separate patch and send
> > it to the iommu+dt maintainers.
> > 
> > Supporting the iommus on rk3588 can be realized separately and the
> > patch needs to go through a separate tree anyway.
> 
> Okay, I will split this patch out of this vop2 series, does this mean that
> I also need to split out the iommu dt node as a separate patch from current
> PATCH16 ?

no :-) .

The vop-iommu can stay together with the vop core node.
As adding the actual vop iommu is very much tied to the vop node.

For the iommu-compatible it was different. The compatible just declares
that the iommu acts similar to the one on rk3568, so is related to the iommu
driver itself and should go through the iommu tree.

So all is good here.

Heiko

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml
index ba9124f721f1..621dde0e45d8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/rockchip,iommu.yaml
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@  description: |+
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - rockchip,iommu
-      - rockchip,rk3568-iommu
+    oneOf:
+      - enum:
+          - rockchip,iommu
+          - rockchip,rk3568-iommu
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - rockchip,rk3588-iommu
+          - const: rockchip,rk3568-iommu
 
   reg:
     items: