| Message ID | a6a7bfa4-a7bb-4103-9887-63c69356d187@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | xfs: short circuit xfs_growfs_data_private() if delta is zero | expand |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:28:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Although xfs_growfs_data() doesn't call xfs_growfs_data_private() > if in->newblocks == mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, xfs_growfs_data_private() > further massages the new block count so that we don't i.e. try > to create a too-small new AG. > > This may lead to a delta of "0" in xfs_growfs_data_private(), so > we end up in the shrink case and emit the EXPERIMENTAL warning > even if we're not changing anything at all. > > Fix this by returning straightaway if the block delta is zero. > > (nb: in older kernels, the result of entering the shrink case > with delta == 0 may actually let an -ENOSPC escape to userspace, > which is confusing for users.) > > Fixes: fb2fc1720185 ("xfs: support shrinking unused space in the last AG") > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Seems like a reasonable addition... Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> --D > --- > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c > index 7cb75cb6b8e9..80811d16dde0 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c > @@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private( > if (delta < 0 && nagcount < 2) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* No work to do */ > + if (delta == 0) > + return 0; > + > oagcount = mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; > /* allocate the new per-ag structures */ > if (nagcount > oagcount) { > >
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:28:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Although xfs_growfs_data() doesn't call xfs_growfs_data_private() > if in->newblocks == mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, xfs_growfs_data_private() > further massages the new block count so that we don't i.e. try > to create a too-small new AG. > > This may lead to a delta of "0" in xfs_growfs_data_private(), so > we end up in the shrink case and emit the EXPERIMENTAL warning > even if we're not changing anything at all. > > Fix this by returning straightaway if the block delta is zero. > > (nb: in older kernels, the result of entering the shrink case > with delta == 0 may actually let an -ENOSPC escape to userspace, > which is confusing for users.) > > Fixes: fb2fc1720185 ("xfs: support shrinking unused space in the last AG") > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c index 7cb75cb6b8e9..80811d16dde0 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c @@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private( if (delta < 0 && nagcount < 2) return -EINVAL; + /* No work to do */ + if (delta == 0) + return 0; + oagcount = mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; /* allocate the new per-ag structures */ if (nagcount > oagcount) {
Although xfs_growfs_data() doesn't call xfs_growfs_data_private() if in->newblocks == mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, xfs_growfs_data_private() further massages the new block count so that we don't i.e. try to create a too-small new AG. This may lead to a delta of "0" in xfs_growfs_data_private(), so we end up in the shrink case and emit the EXPERIMENTAL warning even if we're not changing anything at all. Fix this by returning straightaway if the block delta is zero. (nb: in older kernels, the result of entering the shrink case with delta == 0 may actually let an -ENOSPC escape to userspace, which is confusing for users.) Fixes: fb2fc1720185 ("xfs: support shrinking unused space in the last AG") Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> ---