| Message ID | 20231031-send-lp-kselftests-v3-3-2b1655c2605f@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | livepatch: Move modules to selftests and add a new test | expand |
On 10/31/23 15:10, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting > because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets > livepatched either when sleeping in the userspace or when entering > or leaving the kernel space. > > The livepatch is a bit tricky: > 1. The syscall function name is architecture specific. Also > ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER must be taken in account. > > 2. The syscall must stay working the same way for other processes > on the system. It is solved by decrementing a counter only > for PIDs of the test processes. It means that the test processes > has to call the livepatched syscall at least once. > > The test creates one userspace process per online cpu. The processes > are calling getpid in a busy loop. The intention is to create random > locations when the livepatch gets enabled. Nothing is guarantted. > The magic is in the randomness. > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 4 +- > tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh | 53 ++++++++++ > .../selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c | 44 ++++++++ > .../selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile | 3 +- > .../livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > index 119e2bbebe5d..35418a4790be 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +TEST_GEN_FILES := test_klp-call_getpid > TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR := test_modules > TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh > TEST_PROGS := \ > @@ -8,7 +9,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := \ > test-shadow-vars.sh \ > test-state.sh \ > test-ftrace.sh \ > - test-sysfs.sh > + test-sysfs.sh \ > + test-syscall.sh > > TEST_FILES := settings > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..b76a881d4013 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > +#!/bin/bash > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE > +# Author: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > + > +. $(dirname $0)/functions.sh > + > +MOD_SYSCALL=test_klp_syscall > + > +setup_config > + > +# - Start _NRPROC processes calling getpid and load a livepatch to patch the > +# getpid syscall. Check if all the processes transitioned to the livepatched > +# state. > + > +start_test "patch getpid syscall while being heavily hammered" > + > +for i in $(seq 1 $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)); do > + ./test_klp-call_getpid & > + pids[$i]="$!" > +done > + > +pid_list=$(echo ${pids[@]} | tr ' ' ',') > +load_lp $MOD_SYSCALL klp_pids=$pid_list > + > +# wait for all tasks to transition to patched state > +loop_until 'grep -q '^0$' /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids' > + > +pending_pids=$(cat /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids) > +log "$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: $pending_pids" > + > +for pid in ${pids[@]}; do > + kill $pid || true > +done > + > +disable_lp $MOD_SYSCALL > +unload_lp $MOD_SYSCALL > + > +check_result "% insmod test_modules/$MOD_SYSCALL.ko klp_pids=$pid_list > +livepatch: enabling patch '$MOD_SYSCALL' > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing patching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting patching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing patching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': patching complete > +$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: 0 > +% echo 0 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/$MOD_SYSCALL/enabled > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing unpatching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting unpatching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing unpatching transition > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': unpatching complete > +% rmmod $MOD_SYSCALL" > + > +exit 0 > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ce321a2d7308 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE > + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> > + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > + */ > + > +#include <stdio.h> > +#include <unistd.h> > +#include <sys/syscall.h> > +#include <sys/types.h> > +#include <signal.h> > + > +static int stop; > +static int sig_int; > + > +void hup_handler(int signum) > +{ > + stop = 1; > +} > + > +void int_handler(int signum) > +{ > + stop = 1; > + sig_int = 1; > +} > + > +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > +{ > + long count = 0; > + > + signal(SIGHUP, &hup_handler); > + signal(SIGINT, &int_handler); > + > + while (!stop) { > + (void)syscall(SYS_getpid); > + count++; > + } > + > + if (sig_int) > + printf("%ld iterations done\n", count); > + > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > index 6f7c2103d27d..f5e880269bff 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-m += test_klp_atomic_replace.o \ > test_klp_state.o \ > test_klp_state2.o \ > test_klp_state3.o \ > - test_klp_shadow_vars.o > + test_klp_shadow_vars.o \ > + test_klp_syscall.o > > modules: > $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) modules KBUILD_EXTMOD=$(TESTMODS_DIR) > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..619496cc3481 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 SUSE > + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> > + * Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> > + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/sched.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/livepatch.h> > + > +#if defined(__x86_64__) > +#define FN_PREFIX __x64_ > +#elif defined(__s390x__) > +#define FN_PREFIX __s390x_ > +#elif defined(__aarch64__) > +#define FN_PREFIX __arm64_ > +#else > +/* powerpc does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER */ > +#define FN_PREFIX > +#endif > + > +/* Protects klp_pids */ > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(kpid_mutex); > + > +static unsigned int npids, npids_pending; > +static int klp_pids[NR_CPUS]; > +module_param_array(klp_pids, int, &npids_pending, 0); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(klp_pids, "Array of pids to be transitioned to livepatched state."); > + > +static ssize_t npids_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, > + char *buf) > +{ > + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", npids_pending); > +} > + > +static struct kobj_attribute klp_attr = __ATTR_RO(npids); > +static struct kobject *klp_kobj; > + > +asmlinkage long lp_sys_getpid(void) > +{ > + int i; > + > + mutex_lock(&kpid_mutex); > + if (npids_pending > 0) { > + for (i = 0; i < npids; i++) { > + if (current->pid == klp_pids[i]) { > + klp_pids[i] = 0; > + npids_pending--; > + break; > + } > + } > + } > + mutex_unlock(&kpid_mutex); > + > + return task_tgid_vnr(current); > +} > + > +static struct klp_func vmlinux_funcs[] = { > + { > + .old_name = __stringify(FN_PREFIX) "sys_getpid", > + .new_func = lp_sys_getpid, > + }, {} > +}; > + > +static struct klp_object objs[] = { > + { > + /* name being NULL means vmlinux */ > + .funcs = vmlinux_funcs, > + }, {} > +}; > + > +static struct klp_patch patch = { > + .mod = THIS_MODULE, > + .objs = objs, > +}; > + > +static int livepatch_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + klp_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("test_klp_syscall", kernel_kobj); > + if (!klp_kobj) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ret = sysfs_create_file(klp_kobj, &klp_attr.attr); > + if (ret) { > + kobject_put(klp_kobj); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* > + * Save the number pids to transition to livepatched state before the > + * number of pending pids is decremented. > + */ > + npids = npids_pending; > + > + return klp_enable_patch(&patch); > +} > + > +static void livepatch_exit(void) > +{ > + kobject_put(klp_kobj); > +} > + > +module_init(livepatch_init); > +module_exit(livepatch_exit); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > +MODULE_INFO(livepatch, "Y"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Livepatch test: syscall transition"); Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module? thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/31/23 15:10, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting > > because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets > > livepatched either when sleeping in the userspace or when entering > > or leaving the kernel space. > > > > The livepatch is a bit tricky: > > 1. The syscall function name is architecture specific. Also > > ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER must be taken in account. > > > > 2. The syscall must stay working the same way for other processes > > on the system. It is solved by decrementing a counter only > > for PIDs of the test processes. It means that the test processes > > has to call the livepatched syscall at least once. > > > > The test creates one userspace process per online cpu. The processes > > are calling getpid in a busy loop. The intention is to create random > > locations when the livepatch gets enabled. Nothing is guarantted. > > The magic is in the randomness. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 4 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh | 53 ++++++++++ > > .../selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c | 44 ++++++++ > > .../selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile | 3 +- > > .../livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > > index 119e2bbebe5d..35418a4790be 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +TEST_GEN_FILES := test_klp-call_getpid > > TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR := test_modules > > TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh > > TEST_PROGS := \ > > @@ -8,7 +9,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := \ > > test-shadow-vars.sh \ > > test-state.sh \ > > test-ftrace.sh \ > > - test-sysfs.sh > > + test-sysfs.sh \ > > + test-syscall.sh > > TEST_FILES := settings > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh > > new file mode 100755 > > index 000000000000..b76a881d4013 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh > > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > > +#!/bin/bash > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +# Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE > > +# Author: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > + > > +. $(dirname $0)/functions.sh > > + > > +MOD_SYSCALL=test_klp_syscall > > + > > +setup_config > > + > > +# - Start _NRPROC processes calling getpid and load a livepatch to patch the > > +# getpid syscall. Check if all the processes transitioned to the livepatched > > +# state. > > + > > +start_test "patch getpid syscall while being heavily hammered" > > + > > +for i in $(seq 1 $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)); do > > + ./test_klp-call_getpid & > > + pids[$i]="$!" > > +done > > + > > +pid_list=$(echo ${pids[@]} | tr ' ' ',') > > +load_lp $MOD_SYSCALL klp_pids=$pid_list > > + > > +# wait for all tasks to transition to patched state > > +loop_until 'grep -q '^0$' /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids' > > + > > +pending_pids=$(cat /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids) > > +log "$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: $pending_pids" > > + > > +for pid in ${pids[@]}; do > > + kill $pid || true > > +done > > + > > +disable_lp $MOD_SYSCALL > > +unload_lp $MOD_SYSCALL > > + > > +check_result "% insmod test_modules/$MOD_SYSCALL.ko klp_pids=$pid_list > > +livepatch: enabling patch '$MOD_SYSCALL' > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing patching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting patching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing patching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': patching complete > > +$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: 0 > > +% echo 0 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/$MOD_SYSCALL/enabled > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing unpatching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting unpatching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing unpatching transition > > +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': unpatching complete > > +% rmmod $MOD_SYSCALL" > > + > > +exit 0 > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..ce321a2d7308 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE > > + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> > > + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > + */ > > + > > +#include <stdio.h> > > +#include <unistd.h> > > +#include <sys/syscall.h> > > +#include <sys/types.h> > > +#include <signal.h> > > + > > +static int stop; > > +static int sig_int; > > + > > +void hup_handler(int signum) > > +{ > > + stop = 1; > > +} > > + > > +void int_handler(int signum) > > +{ > > + stop = 1; > > + sig_int = 1; > > +} > > + > > +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > +{ > > + long count = 0; > > + > > + signal(SIGHUP, &hup_handler); > > + signal(SIGINT, &int_handler); > > + > > + while (!stop) { > > + (void)syscall(SYS_getpid); > > + count++; > > + } > > + > > + if (sig_int) > > + printf("%ld iterations done\n", count); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > > index 6f7c2103d27d..f5e880269bff 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile > > @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-m += test_klp_atomic_replace.o \ > > test_klp_state.o \ > > test_klp_state2.o \ > > test_klp_state3.o \ > > - test_klp_shadow_vars.o > > + test_klp_shadow_vars.o \ > > + test_klp_syscall.o > > modules: > > $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) modules KBUILD_EXTMOD=$(TESTMODS_DIR) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..619496cc3481 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 SUSE > > + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> > > + * Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> > > + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/sched.h> > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/livepatch.h> > > + > > +#if defined(__x86_64__) > > +#define FN_PREFIX __x64_ > > +#elif defined(__s390x__) > > +#define FN_PREFIX __s390x_ > > +#elif defined(__aarch64__) > > +#define FN_PREFIX __arm64_ > > +#else > > +/* powerpc does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER */ > > +#define FN_PREFIX > > +#endif > > + > > +/* Protects klp_pids */ > > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(kpid_mutex); > > + > > +static unsigned int npids, npids_pending; > > +static int klp_pids[NR_CPUS]; > > +module_param_array(klp_pids, int, &npids_pending, 0); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(klp_pids, "Array of pids to be transitioned to livepatched state."); > > + > > +static ssize_t npids_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, > > + char *buf) > > +{ > > + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", npids_pending); > > +} > > + > > +static struct kobj_attribute klp_attr = __ATTR_RO(npids); > > +static struct kobject *klp_kobj; > > + > > +asmlinkage long lp_sys_getpid(void) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&kpid_mutex); > > + if (npids_pending > 0) { > > + for (i = 0; i < npids; i++) { > > + if (current->pid == klp_pids[i]) { > > + klp_pids[i] = 0; > > + npids_pending--; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&kpid_mutex); > > + > > + return task_tgid_vnr(current); > > +} > > + > > +static struct klp_func vmlinux_funcs[] = { > > + { > > + .old_name = __stringify(FN_PREFIX) "sys_getpid", > > + .new_func = lp_sys_getpid, > > + }, {} > > +}; > > + > > +static struct klp_object objs[] = { > > + { > > + /* name being NULL means vmlinux */ > > + .funcs = vmlinux_funcs, > > + }, {} > > +}; > > + > > +static struct klp_patch patch = { > > + .mod = THIS_MODULE, > > + .objs = objs, > > +}; > > + > > +static int livepatch_init(void) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + klp_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("test_klp_syscall", kernel_kobj); > > + if (!klp_kobj) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + ret = sysfs_create_file(klp_kobj, &klp_attr.attr); > > + if (ret) { > > + kobject_put(klp_kobj); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Save the number pids to transition to livepatched state before the > > + * number of pending pids is decremented. > > + */ > > + npids = npids_pending; > > + > > + return klp_enable_patch(&patch); > > +} > > + > > +static void livepatch_exit(void) > > +{ > > + kobject_put(klp_kobj); > > +} > > + > > +module_init(livepatch_init); > > +module_exit(livepatch_exit); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > +MODULE_INFO(livepatch, "Y"); > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>"); > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>"); > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>"); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Livepatch test: syscall transition"); > > Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module? Can you please elaborate? This new module use the same MODULE_ macros used by the current livepatch selftests. What do you mean by module name? Thanks in advance, Marcos > > thanks, > -- Shuah
On 12/1/23 06:13, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> >> Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module? > > Can you please elaborate? This new module use the same MODULE_ macros used by > the current livepatch selftests. What do you mean by module name? > Pre-commit checpatch script spdx check complained about the module name. Please run it to see the message. thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/1/23 06:13, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > > > Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module? > > > > Can you please elaborate? This new module use the same MODULE_ > > macros used by > > the current livepatch selftests. What do you mean by module name? > > > > Pre-commit checpatch script spdx check complained about the module > name. > Please run it to see the message. I've ran checkpatch on all the tree patches, and so far it complained about MAINTANERS file needing to be updated (since we removed lib/livepatch and it's mentioned on MAINTAINERS file): $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 000*.patch ----------------------------------------------------------- 0001-kselftests-lib.mk-Add-TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR-variable.patch ----------------------------------------------------------- total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 68 lines checked 0001-kselftests-lib.mk-Add-TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR-variable.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. --------------------------------------------------------------- 0002-livepatch-Move-tests-from-lib-livepatch-to-selftests.patch --------------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit description?) #17: debug and rebuild the tests by running make on the selftests/livepatch directory, WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #82: rename {lib/livepatch => tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules}/test_klp_atomic_replace .c (100%) total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 519 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix- inplace. 0002-livepatch-Move-tests-from-lib-livepatch-to-selftests.patch has style problems, please review. --------------------------------------------------------------- 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch --------------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #60: new file mode 100755 total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 237 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix- inplace. 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your output? I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. Thanks, Marcos > > thanks, > -- Shuah >
On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has > style problems, please review. > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script > showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your > output? > > I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's > missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. > Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on whether or not you would need a module name for this module? I am not too concerned about MAINTAINERS file warns. I am assuming you will be sending a new version to address Joe Lawrence's comments? thanks, -- Shuah
Hi, On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has > > style problems, please review. > > > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > > > I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script > > showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your > > output? > > > > I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's > > missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. > > > > Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on > whether or not you would need a module name for this module? I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? Miroslav
On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >> >>> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has >>> style problems, please review. >>> >>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >>> >>> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script >>> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your >>> output? >>> >>> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's >>> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. >>> >> >> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on >> whether or not you would need a module name for this module? > > I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In > this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There > is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? > I see that now. thanks, -- Shuah
On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: >> >>> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> >>>> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has >>>> style problems, please review. >>>> >>>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >>>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >>>> >>>> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script >>>> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your >>>> output? >>>> >>>> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's >>>> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. >>>> >>> >>> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on >>> whether or not you would need a module name for this module? >> >> I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In >> this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There >> is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? >> > > I see that now. > Hi Shuah, In the other replies to this thread, Marcos noted that he would add some text to the commit / documentation on running and building the selftests directly in the kernel tree (that would get my Ack) ... is there anything else to be updated for a hopefully final v4 (for your Ack)? Thanks,
On 12/15/23 13:36, Joe Lawrence wrote: > On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> >>>>> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has >>>>> style problems, please review. >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >>>>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >>>>> >>>>> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script >>>>> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your >>>>> output? >>>>> >>>>> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's >>>>> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on >>>> whether or not you would need a module name for this module? >>> >>> I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In >>> this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There >>> is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? >>> >> >> I see that now. >> > > Hi Shuah, > > In the other replies to this thread, Marcos noted that he would add some > text to the commit / documentation on running and building the selftests > directly in the kernel tree (that would get my Ack) ... is there > anything else to be updated for a hopefully final v4 (for your Ack)? > I am waiting for v4 with your comments are addressed. I can take this through kselftest tree. thanks, -- Shuah
On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 13:47 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/15/23 13:36, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily- > > > > > > call.patch has > > > > > > style problems, please review. > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please > > > > > > report > > > > > > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in > > > > > > MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > > > > > > > I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is > > > > > > your script > > > > > > showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share > > > > > > your > > > > > > output? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand > > > > > > what's > > > > > > missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands > > > > > on > > > > > whether or not you would need a module name for this module? > > > > > > > > I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in > > > > Makefile. In > > > > this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything > > > > else. There > > > > is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? > > > > > > > > > > I see that now. > > > > > > > Hi Shuah, > > > > In the other replies to this thread, Marcos noted that he would add > > some > > text to the commit / documentation on running and building the > > selftests > > directly in the kernel tree (that would get my Ack) ... is there > > anything else to be updated for a hopefully final v4 (for your > > Ack)? > > > > > I am waiting for v4 with your comments are addressed. I can take > this through kselftest tree. Ok. I'm already preparing the v4. The plan is to send in the next few days. Thanks, Marcos > > thanks, > -- Shuah >
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile index 119e2bbebe5d..35418a4790be 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +TEST_GEN_FILES := test_klp-call_getpid TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR := test_modules TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh TEST_PROGS := \ @@ -8,7 +9,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := \ test-shadow-vars.sh \ test-state.sh \ test-ftrace.sh \ - test-sysfs.sh + test-sysfs.sh \ + test-syscall.sh TEST_FILES := settings diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..b76a881d4013 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE +# Author: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> + +. $(dirname $0)/functions.sh + +MOD_SYSCALL=test_klp_syscall + +setup_config + +# - Start _NRPROC processes calling getpid and load a livepatch to patch the +# getpid syscall. Check if all the processes transitioned to the livepatched +# state. + +start_test "patch getpid syscall while being heavily hammered" + +for i in $(seq 1 $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)); do + ./test_klp-call_getpid & + pids[$i]="$!" +done + +pid_list=$(echo ${pids[@]} | tr ' ' ',') +load_lp $MOD_SYSCALL klp_pids=$pid_list + +# wait for all tasks to transition to patched state +loop_until 'grep -q '^0$' /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids' + +pending_pids=$(cat /sys/kernel/test_klp_syscall/npids) +log "$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: $pending_pids" + +for pid in ${pids[@]}; do + kill $pid || true +done + +disable_lp $MOD_SYSCALL +unload_lp $MOD_SYSCALL + +check_result "% insmod test_modules/$MOD_SYSCALL.ko klp_pids=$pid_list +livepatch: enabling patch '$MOD_SYSCALL' +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing patching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting patching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing patching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': patching complete +$MOD_SYSCALL: Remaining not livepatched processes: 0 +% echo 0 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/$MOD_SYSCALL/enabled +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': initializing unpatching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': starting unpatching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': completing unpatching transition +livepatch: '$MOD_SYSCALL': unpatching complete +% rmmod $MOD_SYSCALL" + +exit 0 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ce321a2d7308 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> + */ + +#include <stdio.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <sys/syscall.h> +#include <sys/types.h> +#include <signal.h> + +static int stop; +static int sig_int; + +void hup_handler(int signum) +{ + stop = 1; +} + +void int_handler(int signum) +{ + stop = 1; + sig_int = 1; +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + long count = 0; + + signal(SIGHUP, &hup_handler); + signal(SIGINT, &int_handler); + + while (!stop) { + (void)syscall(SYS_getpid); + count++; + } + + if (sig_int) + printf("%ld iterations done\n", count); + + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile index 6f7c2103d27d..f5e880269bff 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-m += test_klp_atomic_replace.o \ test_klp_state.o \ test_klp_state2.o \ test_klp_state3.o \ - test_klp_shadow_vars.o + test_klp_shadow_vars.o \ + test_klp_syscall.o modules: $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) modules KBUILD_EXTMOD=$(TESTMODS_DIR) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..619496cc3481 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 SUSE + * Authors: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> + * Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> + * Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> + */ + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/livepatch.h> + +#if defined(__x86_64__) +#define FN_PREFIX __x64_ +#elif defined(__s390x__) +#define FN_PREFIX __s390x_ +#elif defined(__aarch64__) +#define FN_PREFIX __arm64_ +#else +/* powerpc does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER */ +#define FN_PREFIX +#endif + +/* Protects klp_pids */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(kpid_mutex); + +static unsigned int npids, npids_pending; +static int klp_pids[NR_CPUS]; +module_param_array(klp_pids, int, &npids_pending, 0); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(klp_pids, "Array of pids to be transitioned to livepatched state."); + +static ssize_t npids_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, + char *buf) +{ + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", npids_pending); +} + +static struct kobj_attribute klp_attr = __ATTR_RO(npids); +static struct kobject *klp_kobj; + +asmlinkage long lp_sys_getpid(void) +{ + int i; + + mutex_lock(&kpid_mutex); + if (npids_pending > 0) { + for (i = 0; i < npids; i++) { + if (current->pid == klp_pids[i]) { + klp_pids[i] = 0; + npids_pending--; + break; + } + } + } + mutex_unlock(&kpid_mutex); + + return task_tgid_vnr(current); +} + +static struct klp_func vmlinux_funcs[] = { + { + .old_name = __stringify(FN_PREFIX) "sys_getpid", + .new_func = lp_sys_getpid, + }, {} +}; + +static struct klp_object objs[] = { + { + /* name being NULL means vmlinux */ + .funcs = vmlinux_funcs, + }, {} +}; + +static struct klp_patch patch = { + .mod = THIS_MODULE, + .objs = objs, +}; + +static int livepatch_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + klp_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("test_klp_syscall", kernel_kobj); + if (!klp_kobj) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = sysfs_create_file(klp_kobj, &klp_attr.attr); + if (ret) { + kobject_put(klp_kobj); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Save the number pids to transition to livepatched state before the + * number of pending pids is decremented. + */ + npids = npids_pending; + + return klp_enable_patch(&patch); +} + +static void livepatch_exit(void) +{ + kobject_put(klp_kobj); +} + +module_init(livepatch_init); +module_exit(livepatch_exit); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_INFO(livepatch, "Y"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Livepatch test: syscall transition");
The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets livepatched either when sleeping in the userspace or when entering or leaving the kernel space. The livepatch is a bit tricky: 1. The syscall function name is architecture specific. Also ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER must be taken in account. 2. The syscall must stay working the same way for other processes on the system. It is solved by decrementing a counter only for PIDs of the test processes. It means that the test processes has to call the livepatched syscall at least once. The test creates one userspace process per online cpu. The processes are calling getpid in a busy loop. The intention is to create random locations when the livepatch gets enabled. Nothing is guarantted. The magic is in the randomness. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-syscall.sh | 53 ++++++++++ .../selftests/livepatch/test_klp-call_getpid.c | 44 ++++++++ .../selftests/livepatch/test_modules/Makefile | 3 +- .../livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)