| Message ID | 4556052.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code | expand |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > the thermal netlink library. > > Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I would like to get it into 6.8. Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. Thanks!
Hi Rafael, On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >> the thermal netlink library. >> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > would like to get it into 6.8. > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > Thanks! > I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you like. Regards, Lukasz
Hi Rafael, On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >> the thermal netlink library. >> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > would like to get it into 6.8. > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ?
Hi Lukasz, On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > >> the thermal netlink library. > >> > >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > > would like to get it into 6.8. > > > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > > > Thanks! > > > > I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. > I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you > like. Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated!
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:54 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > >> the thermal netlink library. > >> > >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > > would like to get it into 6.8. > > > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. > Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ? I can defer them a few days of course, but if Lukasz can review them in the meantime, I think that should be sufficient?
On 1/3/24 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >>>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >>>> the thermal netlink library. >>>> >>>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. >>> >>> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I >>> would like to get it into 6.8. >>> >>> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. >> I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you >> like. > > Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated! Sure, no problem, I'll do that today.