diff mbox series

[v6,1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add clock controller of SG2000 series SoC

Message ID IA1PR20MB4953B0CD5B8796102DE358C2BB6D2@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Conor Dooley
Headers show
Series riscv: sophgo: add clock support for Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 SoCs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-fixes-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Inochi Amaoto Jan. 14, 2024, 4:16 a.m. UTC
SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
string is needed for the new SoC.

Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.

Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.43.0

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Jan. 15, 2024, 7:31 a.m. UTC | #1
On 14/01/2024 05:16, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
> string is needed for the new SoC.
> 
> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Conor Dooley Jan. 15, 2024, 4:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
> string is needed for the new SoC.
> 
> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> 
> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
> 
>  maintainers:
>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
>      enum:
>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk

I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
different chip?

Thanks,
Conor.
Inochi Amaoto Jan. 16, 2024, 12:27 a.m. UTC | #3
>On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
>> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
>> string is needed for the new SoC.
>>
>> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>
>> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
>> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
>>
>>  maintainers:
>>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
>>      enum:
>>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
>>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
>> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
>
>I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
>renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
>different chip?
>
>Thanks,
>Conor.

Hi Conor,

The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
rename.

For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
logic.

Thanks,
Inochi
Conor Dooley Jan. 16, 2024, 7:36 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
> >> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
> >> string is needed for the new SoC.
> >>
> >> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> >> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
> >>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>
> >> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
> >> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
> >>
> >>  maintainers:
> >>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
> >>      enum:
> >>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
> >>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
> >> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
> >
> >I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
> >renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
> >different chip?

> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
> rename.
> 
> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
> logic.

I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that
Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going
forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change.
I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the
series.

Thanks,
Conor.
Inochi Amaoto Jan. 16, 2024, 8 a.m. UTC | #5
>On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>>> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
>>>> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
>>>> string is needed for the new SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>>>> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
>>>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>
>>>> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
>>>> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
>>>>
>>>>  maintainers:
>>>>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
>>>>      enum:
>>>>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
>>>>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
>>>> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
>>>
>>> I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
>>> renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
>>> different chip?
>
>> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
>> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
>> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
>> rename.
>>
>> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
>> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
>> logic.
>
>I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that
>Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going
>forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change.
>I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the
>series.
>
>Thanks,
>Conor.

For your question, this is the rename chip I mentioned.

This is the name mapping I have known:
cv1812cp -> sg2000
cv1813h -> sg2002
Conor Dooley Jan. 16, 2024, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #6
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 04:00:45PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >>>> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
> >>>> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
> >>>> string is needed for the new SoC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> >>>> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >>>> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >>>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
> >>>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>>
> >>>> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
> >>>> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
> >>>>
> >>>>  maintainers:
> >>>>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> >>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
> >>>>      enum:
> >>>>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
> >>>>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
> >>>> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
> >>>
> >>> I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
> >>> renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
> >>> different chip?
> >
> >> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
> >> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
> >> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
> >> rename.
> >>
> >> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
> >> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
> >> logic.
> >
> >I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that
> >Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going
> >forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change.
> >I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the
> >series.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Conor.
> 
> For your question, this is the rename chip I mentioned.
> 
> This is the name mapping I have known:
> cv1812cp -> sg2000
> cv1813h -> sg2002

Great, thanks :)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ 
 $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
 $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#

-title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
+title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller

 maintainers:
   - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@  properties:
     enum:
       - sophgo,cv1800-clk
       - sophgo,cv1810-clk
+      - sophgo,sg2000-clk

   reg:
     maxItems: 1