diff mbox series

[06/10] cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode

Message ID 20240122123845.3822570-7-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series netfs, afs, cifs, cachefiles, erofs: Miscellaneous fixes | expand

Commit Message

David Howells Jan. 22, 2024, 12:38 p.m. UTC 
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:

	RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
	 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
	 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
	 fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
	 process_one_work+0x136/0x208
	 process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
	 worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
	 kthread+0xca/0xd2
	 ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33

Fix this by making the calls to cachefiles_ondemand_init_object()
conditional.

Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Jingbo Xu Jan. 22, 2024, 1:48 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 1/22/24 8:38 PM, David Howells wrote:
> cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
> cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
> before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:
> 
> 	RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
> 	...
> 	Call Trace:
> 	 <TASK>
> 	 cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
> 	 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
> 	 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
> 	 fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
> 	 process_one_work+0x136/0x208
> 	 process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
> 	 worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
> 	 kthread+0xca/0xd2
> 	 ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33
> 
> Fix this by making the calls to cachefiles_ondemand_init_object()
> conditional.
> 
> Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
> Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
> index 7ade836beb58..180594d24c44 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
> @@ -473,9 +473,11 @@ struct file *cachefiles_create_tmpfile(struct cachefiles_object *object)
>  	if (!cachefiles_mark_inode_in_use(object, file_inode(file)))
>  		WARN_ON(1);
>  
> -	ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto err_unuse;
> +	if (object->ondemand) {
> +		ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto err_unuse;
> +	}

I'm not sure if object->ondemand shall be checked by the caller or
inside cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(), as
cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() is also called without checking
object->ondemand. cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() won't trigger the
NULL oops as the called cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() will actually
checks that.

Anyway this patch looks good to me.  Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>

>  
>  	ni_size = object->cookie->object_size;
>  	ni_size = round_up(ni_size, CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE);
> @@ -579,9 +581,11 @@ static bool cachefiles_open_file(struct cachefiles_object *object,
>  	}
>  	_debug("file -> %pd positive", dentry);
>  
> -	ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto error_fput;
> +	if (object->ondemand) {
> +		ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto error_fput;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = cachefiles_check_auxdata(object, file);
>  	if (ret < 0)
Gao Xiang Jan. 22, 2024, 3:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 2024/1/22 20:38, David Howells wrote:
> cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
> cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
> before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:
> 
> 	RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
> 	...
> 	Call Trace:
> 	 <TASK>
> 	 cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
> 	 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
> 	 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
> 	 fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
> 	 process_one_work+0x136/0x208
> 	 process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
> 	 worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
> 	 kthread+0xca/0xd2
> 	 ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33
> 
> Fix this by making the calls to cachefiles_ondemand_init_object()
> conditional.
> 
> Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
> Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

Looks good to me, thanks for fixing this:

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
David Howells Jan. 22, 2024, 10:01 p.m. UTC | #3 
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> > -	ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		goto err_unuse;
> > +	if (object->ondemand) {
> > +		ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> > +			goto err_unuse;
> > +	}
> 
> I'm not sure if object->ondemand shall be checked by the caller or
> inside cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(), as
> cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() is also called without checking
> object->ondemand. cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() won't trigger the
> NULL oops as the called cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() will actually
> checks that.

Meh.  The above doesn't actually build if CONFIG_CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND=N.  I
think I have to push the check down into cachefiles_ondemand_init_object()
instead.

David
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index 7ade836beb58..180594d24c44 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -473,9 +473,11 @@  struct file *cachefiles_create_tmpfile(struct cachefiles_object *object)
 	if (!cachefiles_mark_inode_in_use(object, file_inode(file)))
 		WARN_ON(1);
 
-	ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto err_unuse;
+	if (object->ondemand) {
+		ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_unuse;
+	}
 
 	ni_size = object->cookie->object_size;
 	ni_size = round_up(ni_size, CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE);
@@ -579,9 +581,11 @@  static bool cachefiles_open_file(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 	}
 	_debug("file -> %pd positive", dentry);
 
-	ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto error_fput;
+	if (object->ondemand) {
+		ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto error_fput;
+	}
 
 	ret = cachefiles_check_auxdata(object, file);
 	if (ret < 0)