Message ID | 20240125-fix-riscv-option-arch-llvm-18-v1-0-390ac9cc3cd0@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Fix CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH with tip of tree LLVM | expand |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Hi all, > > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on > invalid input has started succeeding. > > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error, > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported. > > This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with > '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror', > which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid > test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings. > > I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures > that use as-instr and I have found no issues. > > I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with > sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :) > > [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ac9fe69f70a2b3541266daedbaaa7dc9c007a2a > > --- > Nathan Chancellor (2): > kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation > RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 - > scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +- > scripts/Makefile.compiler | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Looks good, Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Unfortunately another LLVM commit just broke TOOLCHAIN_HAS_VECTOR_CRYPTO, so I've sent out a patch to fix that too... But with all the fixes applied it works again. - Eric
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 5:03 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have > > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on > > invalid input has started succeeding. > > > > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an > > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error, > > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported. > > > > This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with > > '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror', > > which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid > > test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings. > > > > I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures > > that use as-instr and I have found no issues. > > > > I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with > > sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :) > > > > [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ac9fe69f70a2b3541266daedbaaa7dc9c007a2a > > > > --- > > Nathan Chancellor (2): > > kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation > > RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH > > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 - > > scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +- > > scripts/Makefile.compiler | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Looks good, > > Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > > Unfortunately another LLVM commit just broke TOOLCHAIN_HAS_VECTOR_CRYPTO, so > I've sent out a patch to fix that too... > > But with all the fixes applied it works again. > > - Eric For this series Tested-by: Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com> Thanks, Andy
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Hi all, > > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on > invalid input has started succeeding. > > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error, > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported. > > This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with > '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror', > which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid > test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings. > > I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures > that use as-instr and I have found no issues. > > I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with > sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :) I think RISC-V would be good, since building the vector crypto stuff also needs this fix. Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Cheers, Conor.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:34 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have > > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on > > invalid input has started succeeding. > > > > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an > > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error, > > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported. > > > > This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with > > '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror', > > which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid > > test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings. > > > > I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures > > that use as-instr and I have found no issues. > > > > I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with > > sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :) > > I think RISC-V would be good, since building the vector crypto stuff > also needs this fix. OK, then I will give ack instead of applying this series. Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Hello: This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:32:10 -0700 you wrote: > Hi all, > > Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have > CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on > invalid input has started succeeding. > > This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an > assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error, > which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [1/2] kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/0ee695a471a7 - [2/2] RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/3aff0c459e77 You are awesome, thank you!