diff mbox series

[4/4] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA

Message ID 0be49d4d7d7e43933534aad6f72b35d3380519fd.1706603678.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show
Series Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V | expand

Commit Message

Xu, Haibo1 Jan. 31, 2024, 2:32 a.m. UTC
Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 arch/riscv/Kconfig        | 1 +
 drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Jan. 31, 2024, 9:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 03:32, Haibo Xu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  config ACPI_NUMA
>  	bool "NUMA support"
>  	depends on NUMA
> -	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> +	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)

The dependency is no longer needed now since these are
the four architectures that support ACPI now that IA64
is gone.

All of them also 'select ACPI_NUMA' by default, though on
x86 this can still be disabled by manually turning off
CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA. I suspect we don't actually ever
want to turn it off on x86 either, so I guess the Kconfig
option can just be removed entirely.

     Arnd
Haibo Xu Feb. 1, 2024, 2:58 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 03:32, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >  config ACPI_NUMA
> >       bool "NUMA support"
> >       depends on NUMA
> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> > +     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
>
> The dependency is no longer needed now since these are
> the four architectures that support ACPI now that IA64
> is gone.
>
> All of them also 'select ACPI_NUMA' by default, though on
> x86 this can still be disabled by manually turning off
> CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA. I suspect we don't actually ever
> want to turn it off on x86 either, so I guess the Kconfig
> option can just be removed entirely.
>

Good catch! Will revert the change in the next version.

To remove the dependency entirely, I think we need a separate patch for it.
What's your opinion?

Regards,
Haibo

>      Arnd
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 1, 2024, 5:52 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, at 03:58, Haibo Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 03:32, Haibo Xu wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
>> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>> >  config ACPI_NUMA
>> >       bool "NUMA support"
>> >       depends on NUMA
>> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
>> > +     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
>>
>> The dependency is no longer needed now since these are
>> the four architectures that support ACPI now that IA64
>> is gone.
>>
>> All of them also 'select ACPI_NUMA' by default, though on
>> x86 this can still be disabled by manually turning off
>> CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA. I suspect we don't actually ever
>> want to turn it off on x86 either, so I guess the Kconfig
>> option can just be removed entirely.
>>
>
> Good catch! Will revert the change in the next version.
>
> To remove the dependency entirely, I think we need a separate patch for it.
> What's your opinion?

Agreed, that last bit would need to be acked by the x86
maintainers then, as it only affects them in practice.

     Arnd
Sunil V L March 5, 2024, 5:26 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:32:01AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig        | 1 +
>  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index bffbd869a068..e586ab959f34 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ config NUMA
>  	select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>  	select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
>  	select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> +	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
>  	select OF_NUMA
>  	select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
>  	help
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  config ACPI_NUMA
>  	bool "NUMA support"
>  	depends on NUMA
> -	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> +	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
Is it possible to remove this if IA64 is removed now? 

Thanks,
Sunil
>  	default y if ARM64
>  
>  config ACPI_HMAT
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
Haibo Xu March 5, 2024, 8:32 a.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:26 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:32:01AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig        | 1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index bffbd869a068..e586ab959f34 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ config NUMA
> >       select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> >       select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
> >       select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> > +     select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
> >       select OF_NUMA
> >       select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> >       help
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >  config ACPI_NUMA
> >       bool "NUMA support"
> >       depends on NUMA
> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> > +     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
> Is it possible to remove this if IA64 is removed now?
>

Yes. Arnd also suggest removing this totally.
Will update it in v2.

> Thanks,
> Sunil
> >       default y if ARM64
> >
> >  config ACPI_HMAT
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index bffbd869a068..e586ab959f34 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -438,6 +438,7 @@  config NUMA
 	select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
+	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
 	select OF_NUMA
 	select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
index 849c2bd820b9..525297c44250 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ 
 config ACPI_NUMA
 	bool "NUMA support"
 	depends on NUMA
-	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
+	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH || RISCV)
 	default y if ARM64
 
 config ACPI_HMAT