| Message ID | 20240229150729.1620410-1-svens@stackframe.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support | expand |
Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes: > Hi List, > > this patchset adds a new -dfilter option and address range matching. With this > execlog can match only a certain range of address for both instruction and > data adresses. > > Example usage: > > qemu-system-xxx <other options> -d plugin -plugin libexeclog.so,afilter=0x1000-0x2000,dfilter=0x388 > > This would only log instruction in the address range 0x1000 to 0x2000 > and accessing data at address 0x388. > > Changes in v2: > - rebased on top of latest master > > Sven Schnelle (3): > plugins/execlog: pass matches array to parse_vaddr_match I think we've lost a patch in the re-posting. patchew hasn't seen it either: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20240229150729.1620410-1-svens@stackframe.org/ > plugins/execlog: add data address match > plugins/execlog: add address range matching > > contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Hi Alex, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes: > Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes: > I think we've lost a patch in the re-posting. patchew hasn't seen it > either: > > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20240229150729.1620410-1-svens@stackframe.org/ > >> plugins/execlog: add data address match >> plugins/execlog: add address range matching >> >> contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Yes, i got a 550 mail. But i'll look into the qemu_set_dfilter_ranges() before resending.