Message ID | 20240304183028.195057-3-gustavo.sousa@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Enable LNL display | expand |
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:30:21PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > There will be future changes that rely on the source of the MDCLK. Let's > have xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() as the function responsible for reporting > that information. > > Bspec: 69090 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c > index 407bd541eb46..bf84bf27213f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c > @@ -1876,6 +1876,21 @@ static bool cdclk_pll_is_unknown(unsigned int vco) > return vco == ~0; > } > > +static u32 xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > +{ > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) > + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; > + > + /* > + * Earlier display IPs do not provide means of selecting the > + * MDCLK source, but MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK is a nice default, > + * since it reflects the source used for those and allows > + * xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() to be used in logic that depends on > + * it. > + */ > + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK; At the moment this function only gets called on Xe2 and beyond where the register field exists; if that's going to change soon, then wouldn't it be more natural to just use an early exit to highlight that there's nothing we need to OR into the CDCLK_CTL for earlier platforms? /* Not configurable for older platforms; they always use CD2XCLK */ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20) return 0; Functionally it's the same, but it feels more intuitive to me. If we aren't expecting to call this from common codepaths that aren't already protected by a display version check, then we could make this a drm_WARN_ON() to assert that we haven't deviated from expected behavior. Matt > +} > + > static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config, > const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config, > @@ -1980,7 +1995,7 @@ static u32 bxt_cdclk_ctl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > val |= BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE; > > if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) > - val |= MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; > + val |= xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(i915); > else > val |= skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index e00557e1a57f..eb953ed1f113 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -5900,7 +5900,9 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define CDCLK_FREQ_540 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 1) > #define CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 2) > #define CDCLK_FREQ_675_617 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 3) > -#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_BIT(25) > +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(25, 25) > +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 0) > +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 1) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 22) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 0) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 1) > -- > 2.44.0 >
Quoting Matt Roper (2024-03-04 18:58:34-03:00) >On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:30:21PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >> There will be future changes that rely on the source of the MDCLK. Let's >> have xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() as the function responsible for reporting >> that information. >> >> Bspec: 69090 >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >> index 407bd541eb46..bf84bf27213f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >> @@ -1876,6 +1876,21 @@ static bool cdclk_pll_is_unknown(unsigned int vco) >> return vco == ~0; >> } >> >> +static u32 xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> +{ >> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) >> + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Earlier display IPs do not provide means of selecting the >> + * MDCLK source, but MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK is a nice default, >> + * since it reflects the source used for those and allows >> + * xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() to be used in logic that depends on >> + * it. >> + */ >> + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK; > >At the moment this function only gets called on Xe2 and beyond where the >register field exists; if that's going to change soon, then wouldn't it >be more natural to just use an early exit to highlight that there's >nothing we need to OR into the CDCLK_CTL for earlier platforms? > > /* Not configurable for older platforms; they always use CD2XCLK */ > if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20) > return 0; > >Functionally it's the same, but it feels more intuitive to me. > >If we aren't expecting to call this from common codepaths that aren't >already protected by a display version check, then we could make this a >drm_WARN_ON() to assert that we haven't deviated from expected behavior. Well, the intention here was for this function to serve 2 purposes: (i) to give the value of the "MDCLK Source Select" field of CDCLK_CTL and also (ii) tell which was the source of the MDCLK for displays pre and post (including) Xe2LPD, because we will need that information in "drm/i915: Add mdclk_cdclk_ratio to intel_dbuf_state". I was hoping to do that instead of creating a new enum, but maybe it will just cause confusion? Should we have one function to tell us the source and another for giving the value of the register field? -- Gustavo Sousa > > >Matt > >> +} >> + >> static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i915, >> const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config, >> const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config, >> @@ -1980,7 +1995,7 @@ static u32 bxt_cdclk_ctl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, >> val |= BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE; >> >> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) >> - val |= MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; >> + val |= xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(i915); >> else >> val |= skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >> index e00557e1a57f..eb953ed1f113 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >> @@ -5900,7 +5900,9 @@ enum skl_power_gate { >> #define CDCLK_FREQ_540 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 1) >> #define CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 2) >> #define CDCLK_FREQ_675_617 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 3) >> -#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_BIT(25) >> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(25, 25) >> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 0) >> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 1) >> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 22) >> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 0) >> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 1) >> -- >> 2.44.0 >> > >-- >Matt Roper >Graphics Software Engineer >Linux GPU Platform Enablement >Intel Corporation
Quoting Gustavo Sousa (2024-03-05 11:40:48-03:00) >Quoting Matt Roper (2024-03-04 18:58:34-03:00) >>On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:30:21PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >>> There will be future changes that rely on the source of the MDCLK. Let's >>> have xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() as the function responsible for reporting >>> that information. >>> >>> Bspec: 69090 >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++- >>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >>> index 407bd541eb46..bf84bf27213f 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c >>> @@ -1876,6 +1876,21 @@ static bool cdclk_pll_is_unknown(unsigned int vco) >>> return vco == ~0; >>> } >>> >>> +static u32 xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >>> +{ >>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) >>> + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Earlier display IPs do not provide means of selecting the >>> + * MDCLK source, but MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK is a nice default, >>> + * since it reflects the source used for those and allows >>> + * xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() to be used in logic that depends on >>> + * it. >>> + */ >>> + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK; >> >>At the moment this function only gets called on Xe2 and beyond where the >>register field exists; if that's going to change soon, then wouldn't it >>be more natural to just use an early exit to highlight that there's >>nothing we need to OR into the CDCLK_CTL for earlier platforms? >> >> /* Not configurable for older platforms; they always use CD2XCLK */ >> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20) >> return 0; >> >>Functionally it's the same, but it feels more intuitive to me. >> >>If we aren't expecting to call this from common codepaths that aren't >>already protected by a display version check, then we could make this a >>drm_WARN_ON() to assert that we haven't deviated from expected behavior. > >Well, the intention here was for this function to serve 2 purposes: (i) >to give the value of the "MDCLK Source Select" field of CDCLK_CTL and >also (ii) tell which was the source of the MDCLK for displays pre and >post (including) Xe2LPD, because we will need that information in >"drm/i915: Add mdclk_cdclk_ratio to intel_dbuf_state". > >I was hoping to do that instead of creating a new enum, but maybe it >will just cause confusion? > >Should we have one function to tell us the source and another for >giving the value of the register field? Unless there are objections here, I plan on doing something along these lines for v2. -- Gustavo Sousa > >-- >Gustavo Sousa > >> >> >>Matt >> >>> +} >>> + >>> static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i915, >>> const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config, >>> const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config, >>> @@ -1980,7 +1995,7 @@ static u32 bxt_cdclk_ctl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, >>> val |= BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE; >>> >>> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) >>> - val |= MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; >>> + val |= xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(i915); >>> else >>> val |= skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >>> index e00557e1a57f..eb953ed1f113 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >>> @@ -5900,7 +5900,9 @@ enum skl_power_gate { >>> #define CDCLK_FREQ_540 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 1) >>> #define CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 2) >>> #define CDCLK_FREQ_675_617 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 3) >>> -#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_BIT(25) >>> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(25, 25) >>> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 0) >>> +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 1) >>> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 22) >>> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 0) >>> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 1) >>> -- >>> 2.44.0 >>> >> >>-- >>Matt Roper >>Graphics Software Engineer >>Linux GPU Platform Enablement >>Intel Corporation
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c index 407bd541eb46..bf84bf27213f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c @@ -1876,6 +1876,21 @@ static bool cdclk_pll_is_unknown(unsigned int vco) return vco == ~0; } +static u32 xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(struct drm_i915_private *i915) +{ + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; + + /* + * Earlier display IPs do not provide means of selecting the + * MDCLK source, but MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK is a nice default, + * since it reflects the source used for those and allows + * xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() to be used in logic that depends on + * it. + */ + return MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK; +} + static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config, const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config, @@ -1980,7 +1995,7 @@ static u32 bxt_cdclk_ctl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, val |= BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE; if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) - val |= MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL; + val |= xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel(i915); else val |= skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index e00557e1a57f..eb953ed1f113 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -5900,7 +5900,9 @@ enum skl_power_gate { #define CDCLK_FREQ_540 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 1) #define CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 2) #define CDCLK_FREQ_675_617 REG_FIELD_PREP(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK, 3) -#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_BIT(25) +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(25, 25) +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CD2XCLK REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 0) +#define MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL REG_FIELD_PREP(MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_MASK, 1) #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 22) #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 0) #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5 REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK, 1)
There will be future changes that rely on the source of the MDCLK. Let's have xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel() as the function responsible for reporting that information. Bspec: 69090 Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)