Message ID | 20240226101218.1472843-8-npiggin@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | powerpc improvements | expand |
On 26/02/2024 11.11, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > SPRs annotated with SPR_HARNESS can change between consecutive reads > because the test harness code has changed them. Avoid failing the > test in this case. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> > --- > powerpc/sprs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c > index 8253ea971..44edd0d7b 100644 > --- a/powerpc/sprs.c > +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > if (before[i] >> 32) > pass = false; > } > - if (!(sprs[i].type & SPR_ASYNC) && (before[i] != after[i])) > + if (!(sprs[i].type & (SPR_HARNESS|SPR_ASYNC)) && (before[i] != after[i])) > pass = false; > > if (sprs[i].width == 32 && !(before[i] >> 32) && !(after[i] >> 32)) I guess you could also squash this into the previous patch (to avoid problems with bisecting later?) ... Anyway: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 9:15 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 26/02/2024 11.11, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > SPRs annotated with SPR_HARNESS can change between consecutive reads > > because the test harness code has changed them. Avoid failing the > > test in this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> > > --- > > powerpc/sprs.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c > > index 8253ea971..44edd0d7b 100644 > > --- a/powerpc/sprs.c > > +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c > > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > if (before[i] >> 32) > > pass = false; > > } > > - if (!(sprs[i].type & SPR_ASYNC) && (before[i] != after[i])) > > + if (!(sprs[i].type & (SPR_HARNESS|SPR_ASYNC)) && (before[i] != after[i])) > > pass = false; > > > > if (sprs[i].width == 32 && !(before[i] >> 32) && !(after[i] >> 32)) > > I guess you could also squash this into the previous patch (to avoid > problems with bisecting later?) ... Yeah, I guess it doesn't make much sense to split out since lots of other stuff changes in the previous patch too. > > Anyway: > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Thanks, Nick
diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c index 8253ea971..44edd0d7b 100644 --- a/powerpc/sprs.c +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (before[i] >> 32) pass = false; } - if (!(sprs[i].type & SPR_ASYNC) && (before[i] != after[i])) + if (!(sprs[i].type & (SPR_HARNESS|SPR_ASYNC)) && (before[i] != after[i])) pass = false; if (sprs[i].width == 32 && !(before[i] >> 32) && !(after[i] >> 32))
SPRs annotated with SPR_HARNESS can change between consecutive reads because the test harness code has changed them. Avoid failing the test in this case. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> --- powerpc/sprs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)