diff mbox series

[v1,5/5] media: ir-spi: Unify indentation and comment style

Message ID 20240305174933.1370708-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series media: ir-spi: A few cleanups | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko March 5, 2024, 5:48 p.m. UTC
Unify the indentation and multi-line comment style.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Andi Shyti March 5, 2024, 10:52 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Andy,

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Unify the indentation and multi-line comment style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> index 801de3d108cc..8fc8e496e6aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ struct ir_spi_data {
>  	struct regulator *regulator;
>  };
>  
> -static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
> -		     unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
> +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)

this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
a change either.

I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>

Andi

>  {
>  	int i;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * the first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
> +		 * The first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
>  		 * contain a pulse duration. On the contrary, 1, 3, 5, ...
>  		 * contain a space duration.
>  		 */
> @@ -146,9 +145,9 @@ static int ir_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (ret)
>  		dc = 50;
>  
> -	/* ir_spi_set_duty_cycle cannot fail,
> -	 * it returns int to be compatible with the
> -	 * rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function
> +	/*
> +	 * ir_spi_set_duty_cycle() cannot fail, it returns int
> +	 * to be compatible with the rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function.
>  	 */
>  	ir_spi_set_duty_cycle(idata->rc, dc);
>  
> @@ -177,7 +176,6 @@ static struct spi_driver ir_spi_driver = {
>  		.of_match_table = ir_spi_of_match,
>  	},
>  };
> -
>  module_spi_driver(ir_spi_driver);
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>");
> -- 
> 2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096
>
Andy Shevchenko March 6, 2024, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:52:15PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
> 
> this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
> a change either.

It's only 82 characters and I consider this as an improvement in readability.
It's quite pity that some of the subsystems are too conservative, hope this
one is not an obstacle for them.

> I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>

Thank you!

Btw, don't you want to either add your entry into .mailcap and/or update your
email address in this source file (and maybe others)? I Cc'ed you only after
I looked closer to the sources...
Andi Shyti March 8, 2024, 12:37 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:52:15PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
> > 
> > this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
> > a change either.
> 
> It's only 82 characters and I consider this as an improvement in readability.
> It's quite pity that some of the subsystems are too conservative, hope this
> one is not an obstacle for them.
> 
> > I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Btw, don't you want to either add your entry into .mailcap and/or update your
> email address in this source file (and maybe others)? I Cc'ed you only after
> I looked closer to the sources...

yes, will do... I also noticed that lots of updates are missing...

I've been far from all this for too long, so that I have still
a lot of catch up to do :-)

Thanks, Andy!
Andi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
index 801de3d108cc..8fc8e496e6aa 100644
--- a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@  struct ir_spi_data {
 	struct regulator *regulator;
 };
 
-static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
-		     unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
+static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
 {
 	int i;
 	int ret;
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@  static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/*
-		 * the first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
+		 * The first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
 		 * contain a pulse duration. On the contrary, 1, 3, 5, ...
 		 * contain a space duration.
 		 */
@@ -146,9 +145,9 @@  static int ir_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (ret)
 		dc = 50;
 
-	/* ir_spi_set_duty_cycle cannot fail,
-	 * it returns int to be compatible with the
-	 * rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function
+	/*
+	 * ir_spi_set_duty_cycle() cannot fail, it returns int
+	 * to be compatible with the rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function.
 	 */
 	ir_spi_set_duty_cycle(idata->rc, dc);
 
@@ -177,7 +176,6 @@  static struct spi_driver ir_spi_driver = {
 		.of_match_table = ir_spi_of_match,
 	},
 };
-
 module_spi_driver(ir_spi_driver);
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>");