Message ID | 20240307131027.66be2266@canb.auug.org.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree | expand |
Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2024-03-07 04:10:27) > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > between commit: > > 984318aaf7b6 ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Move out psr_init_dpcd() from init_connector()") > > from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit: > > e60cff453b82 ("drm/i915/dp: Enable DP tunnel BW allocation mode") > > from the drm tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index 94d2a15d8444,6ece2c563c7a..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@@ -5699,9 -5702,13 +5702,16 @@@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *c > goto out; > } > > + ret = intel_dp_tunnel_detect(intel_dp, ctx); > + if (ret == -EDEADLK) > + return ret; > + > + if (ret == 1) > + intel_connector->base.epoch_counter++; > + > + if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) > + intel_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp); > + Hi, This is the right resolution, should be cleared up shortly once the drm-intel-fixes PR is pulled. Regards, Joonas > intel_dp_detect_dsc_caps(intel_dp, intel_connector); > > intel_dp_configure_mst(intel_dp);
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c index 94d2a15d8444,6ece2c563c7a..000000000000 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c