| Message ID | 20240226122537.75097-1-ada@thorsis.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mtd: nand: raw: atmel: Fix comment in timings preparation | expand |
On 26/02/2024 at 13:25, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Looks like a copy'n'paste mistake introduced when initially adding the > dynamic timings feature with commit f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add > ->setup_data_interface() hooks"). The context around this and > especially the code itself suggests 'read' is meant instead of write. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com> Looks indeed valid: Reviewed-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Thanks Alexander. Best regards, Nicolas > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > index 4cb478bbee4a..dc75d50d52e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > @@ -1370,23 +1370,23 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand, > * > * NRD_PULSE = tRP > */ > ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRP_min, mckperiodps); > totalcycles += ncycles; > ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT, > ncycles); > if (ret) > return ret; > > /* > - * The write cycle timing is directly matching tWC, but is also > + * The read cycle timing is directly matching tRC, but is also > * dependent on the setup and hold timings we calculated earlier, > * which gives: > * > * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD) > * > * NRD_SETUP is always 0. > */ > ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min, mckperiodps); > ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles); > ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_cycle(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT, > ncycles); > > base-commit: d206a76d7d2726f3b096037f2079ce0bd3ba329b > -- > 2.39.2 >
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 12:25:37 UTC, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Looks like a copy'n'paste mistake introduced when initially adding the > dynamic timings feature with commit f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add > ->setup_data_interface() hooks"). The context around this and > especially the code itself suggests 'read' is meant instead of write. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next, thanks. Miquel
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c index 4cb478bbee4a..dc75d50d52e8 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c @@ -1370,23 +1370,23 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand, * * NRD_PULSE = tRP */ ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRP_min, mckperiodps); totalcycles += ncycles; ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT, ncycles); if (ret) return ret; /* - * The write cycle timing is directly matching tWC, but is also + * The read cycle timing is directly matching tRC, but is also * dependent on the setup and hold timings we calculated earlier, * which gives: * * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD) * * NRD_SETUP is always 0. */ ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min, mckperiodps); ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles); ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_cycle(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT, ncycles);
Looks like a copy'n'paste mistake introduced when initially adding the dynamic timings feature with commit f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add ->setup_data_interface() hooks"). The context around this and especially the code itself suggests 'read' is meant instead of write. Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) base-commit: d206a76d7d2726f3b096037f2079ce0bd3ba329b