diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf: Mark bpf prog stack with kmsan_unposion_memory in interpreter mode

Message ID 20240328185801.1843078-1-martin.lau@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e8742081db7d01f980c6161ae1e8a1dbc1e30979
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf: Mark bpf prog stack with kmsan_unposion_memory in interpreter mode | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 953 this patch: 953
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: haoluo@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com sdf@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org eddyz87@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 956 this patch: 956
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 964 this patch: 964
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization

Commit Message

Martin KaFai Lau March 28, 2024, 6:58 p.m. UTC
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

syzbot reported uninit memory usages during map_{lookup,delete}_elem.

==========
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
__dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
____bpf_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/helpers.c:42 [inline]
bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x5c/0x80 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:38
___bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
__bpf_prog_run256+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2237
==========

The reproducer should be in the interpreter mode.

The C reproducer is trying to run the following bpf prog:

    0: (18) r0 = 0x0
    2: (18) r1 = map[id:49]
    4: (b7) r8 = 16777216
    5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r8
    6: (bf) r2 = r10
    7: (07) r2 += -229
            ^^^^^^^^^^

    8: (b7) r3 = 8
    9: (b7) r4 = 0
   10: (85) call dev_map_lookup_elem#1543472
   11: (95) exit

It is due to the "void *key" (r2) passed to the helper. bpf allows uninit
stack memory access for bpf prog with the right privileges. This patch
uses kmsan_unpoison_memory() to mark the stack as initialized.

This should address different syzbot reports on the uninit "void *key"
argument during map_{lookup,delete}_elem.

Reported-by: syzbot+603bcd9b0bf1d94dbb9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000f9ce6d061494e694@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+eb02dc7f03dce0ef39f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000a5c69c06147c2238@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+b4e65ca24fd4d0c734c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000ac56fb06143b6cfa@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+d2b113dc9fea5e1d2848@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0000000000000d69b206142d1ff7@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+1a3cf6f08d68868f9db3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0000000000006f876b061478e878@google.com/
Tested-by: syzbot+1a3cf6f08d68868f9db3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org March 29, 2024, 2:10 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:58:01 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> 
> syzbot reported uninit memory usages during map_{lookup,delete}_elem.
> 
> ==========
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
> __dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
> dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
> ____bpf_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/helpers.c:42 [inline]
> bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x5c/0x80 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:38
> ___bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
> __bpf_prog_run256+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2237
> ==========
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: Mark bpf prog stack with kmsan_unposion_memory in interpreter mode
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e8742081db7d

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 5aacb1d3c4cc..ab400cdd7d7a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2218,6 +2218,7 @@  static unsigned int PROG_NAME(stack_size)(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn
 	u64 stack[stack_size / sizeof(u64)]; \
 	u64 regs[MAX_BPF_EXT_REG] = {}; \
 \
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(stack, sizeof(stack)); \
 	FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; \
 	ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx; \
 	return ___bpf_prog_run(regs, insn); \
@@ -2231,6 +2232,7 @@  static u64 PROG_NAME_ARGS(stack_size)(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5, \
 	u64 stack[stack_size / sizeof(u64)]; \
 	u64 regs[MAX_BPF_EXT_REG]; \
 \
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(stack, sizeof(stack)); \
 	FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; \
 	BPF_R1 = r1; \
 	BPF_R2 = r2; \