| Message ID | 20240328203910.2370087-8-stefanha@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | block: add llseek(SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA) support | expand |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 04:39:08PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > The dm-linear linear target passes through SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA. Extend > the test case to check that the same holes/data are reported as for the > underlying file. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py | 16 +++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > index 4f7c2d01ab3d3..6360b72aee338 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > @@ -45,6 +45,20 @@ def loop_device(file_path): > finally: > run(['losetup', '-d', loop_path]) > > +@contextmanager > +def dm_linear(file_path): > + file_size = os.path.getsize(file_path) > + > + with loop_device(file_path) as loop_path: > + dm_name = f'test-{os.getpid()}' > + run(['dmsetup', 'create', dm_name, '--table', > + f'0 {file_size // 512} linear {loop_path} 0']) Would it be worth tryiing to create the dm with two copies of loop_path concatenated one after the other? You'd have to do more work on expected output (coalescing adjacent data or holes between the tail of the first copy and the head of the second), but without that in place, I worry that you are missing logic bugs for when there is more than one table in the overall dm (as evidenced by my review in 4/9).
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:59:14PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 04:39:08PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > The dm-linear linear target passes through SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA. Extend > > the test case to check that the same holes/data are reported as for the > > underlying file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py | 16 +++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > > index 4f7c2d01ab3d3..6360b72aee338 100755 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py > > @@ -45,6 +45,20 @@ def loop_device(file_path): > > finally: > > run(['losetup', '-d', loop_path]) > > > > +@contextmanager > > +def dm_linear(file_path): > > + file_size = os.path.getsize(file_path) > > + > > + with loop_device(file_path) as loop_path: > > + dm_name = f'test-{os.getpid()}' > > + run(['dmsetup', 'create', dm_name, '--table', > > + f'0 {file_size // 512} linear {loop_path} 0']) > > Would it be worth tryiing to create the dm with two copies of > loop_path concatenated one after the other? You'd have to do more > work on expected output (coalescing adjacent data or holes between the > tail of the first copy and the head of the second), but without that > in place, I worry that you are missing logic bugs for when there is > more than one table in the overall dm (as evidenced by my review in > 4/9). Yes, I agree that more tests are needed to cover transitions between adjacent targets. Stefan
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py index 4f7c2d01ab3d3..6360b72aee338 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py @@ -45,6 +45,20 @@ def loop_device(file_path): finally: run(['losetup', '-d', loop_path]) +@contextmanager +def dm_linear(file_path): + file_size = os.path.getsize(file_path) + + with loop_device(file_path) as loop_path: + dm_name = f'test-{os.getpid()}' + run(['dmsetup', 'create', dm_name, '--table', + f'0 {file_size // 512} linear {loop_path} 0']) + + try: + yield f'/dev/mapper/{dm_name}' + finally: + run(['dmsetup', 'remove', dm_name]) + def test(layout, dev_context_manager): with test_file(layout) as file_path, dev_context_manager(file_path) as dev_path: cmd = run(['./map_holes.py', file_path]) @@ -99,5 +113,5 @@ if __name__ == '__main__': holes_at_beginning_and_end, no_holes, empty_file] - dev_context_managers = [loop_device] + dev_context_managers = [loop_device, dm_linear] test_all(layouts, dev_context_managers)
The dm-linear linear target passes through SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA. Extend the test case to check that the same holes/data are reported as for the underlying file. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/block_seek_hole/test.py | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)