Message ID | 20240405165747.93377-1-purofle@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | staging: fbtft: fb_st7789v: support setting offset | expand |
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 12:57:47AM +0800, purofle wrote: > Some screen sizes using st7789v chips are different from 240x320, > and offsets need to be set to display all images properly. > > Signed-off-by: purofle <purofle@gmail.com> We need a semi-real name here please. > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c > index 861a15414..d47ab4262 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c > @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ > > #define HSD20_IPS 1 > > +#define WIDTH 240 > +#define HEIGHT 320 So you are now hard-coding the size? > + > +#define LEFT_OFFSET 0 > +#define TOP_OFFSET 0 Is this always going to be 0, if so, why need it at all? thanks, greg k-h
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:49:25 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > So you are now hard-coding the size? Yes, the change just helps developers who want to adapt to different screen sizes. > Is this always going to be 0, if so, why need it at all? Not sure. For example, when HEIGHT and WIDTH are 240 and 280, LEFT_OFFSET is 20 and TOP_OFFSET is 0. Different screens may have different offsets. In addition, do I need to resend the patch to modify the Signed-off-by? thanks, purofle
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 01:28:06AM +0800, Yuguo Pei wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:49:25 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > So you are now hard-coding the size? > > Yes, the change just helps developers who want to adapt to different screen sizes. So there is no change? I don't understand. > > Is this always going to be 0, if so, why need it at all? > > Not sure. For example, when HEIGHT and WIDTH are 240 and 280, LEFT_OFFSET is 20 and TOP_OFFSET is 0. Different screens may have different offsets. Then why is this needed? Don't make changes that are not needed by anyone, especially for code in drivers/staging/ > > In addition, do I need to resend the patch to modify the Signed-off-by? Of course you do :)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c index 861a15414..d47ab4262 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ #define HSD20_IPS 1 +#define WIDTH 240 +#define HEIGHT 320 + +#define LEFT_OFFSET 0 +#define TOP_OFFSET 0 + /** * enum st7789v_command - ST7789V display controller commands * @@ -349,6 +355,21 @@ static int set_gamma(struct fbtft_par *par, u32 *curves) return 0; } +static void set_addr_win(struct fbtft_par *par, int xs, int ys, int xe, int ye) +{ + unsigned int x = xs + TOP_OFFSET, y = xe + TOP_OFFSET; + + write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_SET_COLUMN_ADDRESS, (x >> 8) & 0xFF, xs & 0xFF, + (y >> 8) & 0xFF, xe & 0xFF); + + x = ys + LEFT_OFFSET, y = ye + LEFT_OFFSET; + + write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_SET_PAGE_ADDRESS, (x >> 8) & 0xFF, ys & 0xFF, + (y >> 8) & 0xFF, ye & 0xFF); + + write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_WRITE_MEMORY_START); +} + /** * blank() - blank the display * @@ -379,6 +400,7 @@ static struct fbtft_display display = { .set_var = set_var, .set_gamma = set_gamma, .blank = blank, + .set_addr_win = set_addr_win, }, };
Some screen sizes using st7789v chips are different from 240x320, and offsets need to be set to display all images properly. Signed-off-by: purofle <purofle@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)