Message ID | cover.1709655755.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ipmi: Convert to platform remove callback returning void | expand |
Hello, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:26:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > this series converts all drivers below drivers/char/ipmi to struct > platform_driver::remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a > remove callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the > eventual goal. > > All conversations are trivial, because their .remove() callbacks > returned zero unconditionally. > > There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be > picked up individually. But I'd hope that they get picked up all > together by Corey. Apart from a (positive) review reply I didn't get any feedback to this series. My quest to change the prototype of struct platform_driver::remove depends on these patches, so it would be great if they made it in during the next merge window. Best regards Uwe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:26:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > this series converts all drivers below drivers/char/ipmi to struct > > platform_driver::remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a > > remove callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the > > eventual goal. > > > > All conversations are trivial, because their .remove() callbacks > > returned zero unconditionally. > > > > There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be > > picked up individually. But I'd hope that they get picked up all > > together by Corey. Yeah, I was kind of waiting for more reviews, but this is pretty straightforward. I've pulled this into my tree. -corey > > Apart from a (positive) review reply I didn't get any feedback to this > series. My quest to change the prototype of struct > platform_driver::remove depends on these patches, so it would be great > if they made it in during the next merge window. > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | > Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Hello Corey, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:11:21AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:26:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > this series converts all drivers below drivers/char/ipmi to struct > > > platform_driver::remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a > > > remove callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the > > > eventual goal. > > > > > > All conversations are trivial, because their .remove() callbacks > > > returned zero unconditionally. > > > > > > There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be > > > picked up individually. But I'd hope that they get picked up all > > > together by Corey. > > Yeah, I was kind of waiting for more reviews, but this is pretty > straightforward. I've pulled this into my tree. These changes are in next since a while but didn't land in Linus tree for v6.10-rc1. I intend to send a PR to Greg early next week changing platform_driver::remove to match remove_new. If these commits don't make it in in time, I'll be so bold and just include the commits from your for-next branch in my PR. Best regards Uwe
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:10:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Corey, > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:11:21AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:26:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > this series converts all drivers below drivers/char/ipmi to struct > > > > platform_driver::remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a > > > > remove callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the > > > > eventual goal. > > > > > > > > All conversations are trivial, because their .remove() callbacks > > > > returned zero unconditionally. > > > > > > > > There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be > > > > picked up individually. But I'd hope that they get picked up all > > > > together by Corey. > > > > Yeah, I was kind of waiting for more reviews, but this is pretty > > straightforward. I've pulled this into my tree. > > These changes are in next since a while but didn't land in Linus tree > for v6.10-rc1. I intend to send a PR to Greg early next week changing > platform_driver::remove to match remove_new. If these commits don't make > it in in time, I'll be so bold and just include the commits from your > for-next branch in my PR. I sent them to Linus right after 6.9 dropped, let me resend... -corey > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | > Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Hello Corey, On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 09:39:36AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:10:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > These changes are in next since a while but didn't land in Linus tree > > for v6.10-rc1. I intend to send a PR to Greg early next week changing > > platform_driver::remove to match remove_new. If these commits don't make > > it in in time, I'll be so bold and just include the commits from your > > for-next branch in my PR. > > I sent them to Linus right after 6.9 dropped, let me resend... That worked, they landed now in Linus' tree. Thanks, that makes it a bit less ugly for me. Best regards Uwe