Message ID | 20240126085444.324918-28-xiong.y.zhang@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce passthrough vPM | expand |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, Xiong Zhang wrote: > From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> > > Since perf topdown metrics feature is not supported yet, clear > PERF_METRICS MSR for guest. Please rewrite with --verbose, I have no idea what MSR_PERF_METRICS, and thus no clue why it needs to be zeroed when loading guest context, e.g. it's not passed through, so why does it matter? > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > index 4b4da7f17895..ad0434646a29 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > @@ -916,6 +916,10 @@ static void intel_restore_pmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > for (i = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed; i++) > wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, 0); > + > + /* Clear PERF_METRICS MSR since guest topdown metrics is not supported yet. */ > + if (kvm_caps.host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS) > + wrmsrl(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0); > } > > struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = { > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 4/12/2024 5:50 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, Xiong Zhang wrote: >> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> >> >> Since perf topdown metrics feature is not supported yet, clear >> PERF_METRICS MSR for guest. > Please rewrite with --verbose, I have no idea what MSR_PERF_METRICS, and thus no > clue why it needs to be zeroed when loading guest context, e.g. it's not passed > through, so why does it matter? Sure. MSR_PERF_METRICS actually reports the perf topdown metrics portion. I would add more details. > >> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c >> index 4b4da7f17895..ad0434646a29 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c >> @@ -916,6 +916,10 @@ static void intel_restore_pmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> */ >> for (i = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed; i++) >> wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, 0); >> + >> + /* Clear PERF_METRICS MSR since guest topdown metrics is not supported yet. */ >> + if (kvm_caps.host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS) >> + wrmsrl(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0); >> } >> >> struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = { >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c index 4b4da7f17895..ad0434646a29 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c @@ -916,6 +916,10 @@ static void intel_restore_pmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ for (i = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed; i++) wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, 0); + + /* Clear PERF_METRICS MSR since guest topdown metrics is not supported yet. */ + if (kvm_caps.host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS) + wrmsrl(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0); } struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {