mbox series

[0/7] drm/display: Fix display helpers depends on fallouts

Message ID 20240403-fix-dw-hdmi-kconfig-v1-0-afbc4a835c38@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series drm/display: Fix display helpers depends on fallouts | expand

Message

Maxime Ripard April 3, 2024, 10:56 a.m. UTC
Hi,

Here's a series addressing the various regressions that were reported
after the Kconfig rework for the DRM display helpers.

Let me know what you think,
Maxime

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
---
Maxime Ripard (7):
      drm/display: Select DRM_KMS_HELPER for DP helpers
      drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Make DRM_DW_HDMI selectable
      ARM: configs: imx_v6_v7: Enable DRM_DW_HDMI
      ARM: configs: multi_v7: Enable DRM_DW_HDMI
      ARM: configs: sunxi: Enable DRM_DW_HDMI
      arm64: defconfig: Enable DRM_DW_HDMI
      mips: configs: ci20: Enable DRM_DW_HDMI

 arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig    | 1 +
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig     | 1 +
 arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig        | 1 +
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig            | 1 +
 arch/mips/configs/ci20_defconfig        | 1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/Kconfig | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/Kconfig         | 1 +
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 727900b675b749c40ba1f6669c7ae5eb7eb8e837
change-id: 20240403-fix-dw-hdmi-kconfig-068b121eeae7

Best regards,

Comments

Mark Brown April 3, 2024, 11:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:56:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's a series addressing the various regressions that were reported
> after the Kconfig rework for the DRM display helpers.

This makes sense to me and looks like it does the right thing for
multi_v7_defconfig so

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Between the arm64 defconfig update not applying on -next and unrelated
breakage on arm I didn't actually do a proper test.
Mark Brown April 10, 2024, 6:06 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:56:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's a series addressing the various regressions that were reported
> after the Kconfig rework for the DRM display helpers.
> 
> Let me know what you think,
> Maxime

Is there any news on getting the rest of this merged?  It's been more
than a week now and the Designware display controllers are all still
broken in -next, causing widespread breakage in CI.  For bisection
purposes it probably makes sense for the defconfig updates to go along
with the changes to the Kconfig for the driver...
Maxime Ripard April 15, 2024, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Mark

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 07:06:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:56:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here's a series addressing the various regressions that were reported
> > after the Kconfig rework for the DRM display helpers.
> > 
> > Let me know what you think,
> > Maxime
> 
> Is there any news on getting the rest of this merged?  It's been more
> than a week now and the Designware display controllers are all still
> broken in -next, causing widespread breakage in CI.  For bisection
> purposes it probably makes sense for the defconfig updates to go along
> with the changes to the Kconfig for the driver...

I was on holidays so I've admittedly hoped that it would be picked up /
reviewed by the relevant maintainers.

Aside from the changes on sunxi_defconfig, I haven't seen any review
from the relevant maintainers so I'm not sure how to merge this. Should
we get an Acked-by from Arnd, Olof, Catalin or Will and merge everything
through drm-misc?

Maxime
Mark Brown April 15, 2024, 11:53 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:21:47PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 07:06:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Is there any news on getting the rest of this merged?  It's been more
> > than a week now and the Designware display controllers are all still
> > broken in -next, causing widespread breakage in CI.  For bisection
> > purposes it probably makes sense for the defconfig updates to go along
> > with the changes to the Kconfig for the driver...

> I was on holidays so I've admittedly hoped that it would be picked up /
> reviewed by the relevant maintainers.

> Aside from the changes on sunxi_defconfig, I haven't seen any review
> from the relevant maintainers so I'm not sure how to merge this. Should
> we get an Acked-by from Arnd, Olof, Catalin or Will and merge everything
> through drm-misc?

Sounds like a reasonable plan to me - usually it'd be the SoC
maintainers for stuff like this but they're not on the CC, though TBH it
seems sufficiently obvious that I doubt anyone would mind if you just
merged things without waiting.