diff mbox series

drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref

Message ID 20240418223756.68427-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref | expand

Commit Message

Rodrigo Vivi April 18, 2024, 10:37 p.m. UTC
In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure
wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case
and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again
by display with commit 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner
wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")

However, on the display code, most of the callers are using the
raw wakeref, rather then the wakelock version. What caused a
major regression caught by CI.

Another option to this patch is to go with the original plan and
use the get_if_in_use variant in the display code, what is enough
to fulfil our needs. Then, an extra patch to delete the unused
_noresume variant.

v2: Keep grabbing wakelock but only assert for wakeref. (Imre)

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10875
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c |  6 ------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c            | 14 +++++---------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Imre Deak April 18, 2024, 11:58 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure
> wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case
> and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again
> by display with commit 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner
> wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
> 
> However, on the display code, most of the callers are using the
> raw wakeref, rather then the wakelock version. What caused a
> major regression caught by CI.
> 
> Another option to this patch is to go with the original plan and
> use the get_if_in_use variant in the display code, what is enough
> to fulfil our needs. Then, an extra patch to delete the unused
> _noresume variant.
> 
> v2: Keep grabbing wakelock but only assert for wakeref. (Imre)
> 
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10875
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c |  6 ------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c            | 14 +++++---------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 048943d0a881..03dc7edcc443 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -640,12 +640,6 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
>  	enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The caller must hold already raw wakeref, upgrade that to a proper
> -	 * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during
> -	 * power well disabling.
> -	 */
> -	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
>  	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(rpm);
>  
>  	for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index d4e844128826..2d0647aca964 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -272,15 +272,11 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>   * intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume - grab a runtime pm reference
>   * @rpm: the intel_runtime_pm structure
>   *
> - * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference (mostly used for GEM
> - * code to ensure the GTT or GT is on).
> + * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference.
>   *
> - * It will _not_ power up the device but instead only check that it's powered
> - * on.  Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
> - * the device is known to be powered up and where trying to power it up would
> - * result in hilarity and deadlocks. That pretty much means only the system
> - * suspend/resume code where this is used to grab runtime pm references for
> - * delayed setup down in work items.
> + * It will _not_ resume the device but instead only get an extra wakeref.
> + * Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
> + * the device is known to be active and with another wakeref previously hold.
>   *
>   * Any runtime pm reference obtained by this function must have a symmetric
>   * call to intel_runtime_pm_put() to release the reference again.
> @@ -289,7 +285,7 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>   */
>  intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>  {
> -	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(rpm);
> +	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
>  	pm_runtime_get_noresume(rpm->kdev);
>  
>  	intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, true);
> -- 
> 2.44.0
>
Jani Nikula April 19, 2024, 9:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure
>> wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case
>> and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again
>> by display with commit 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner
>> wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
>> 
>> However, on the display code, most of the callers are using the
>> raw wakeref, rather then the wakelock version. What caused a
>> major regression caught by CI.
>> 
>> Another option to this patch is to go with the original plan and
>> use the get_if_in_use variant in the display code, what is enough
>> to fulfil our needs. Then, an extra patch to delete the unused
>> _noresume variant.
>> 
>> v2: Keep grabbing wakelock but only assert for wakeref. (Imre)
>> 
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Fixes: 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10875
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to drm-xe-next where the
offending commit was pushed.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c |  6 ------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c            | 14 +++++---------
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
>> index 048943d0a881..03dc7edcc443 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
>> @@ -640,12 +640,6 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
>>  	enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
>>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>>  
>> -	/*
>> -	 * The caller must hold already raw wakeref, upgrade that to a proper
>> -	 * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during
>> -	 * power well disabling.
>> -	 */
>> -	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
>>  	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(rpm);
>>  
>>  	for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> index d4e844128826..2d0647aca964 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> @@ -272,15 +272,11 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>>   * intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume - grab a runtime pm reference
>>   * @rpm: the intel_runtime_pm structure
>>   *
>> - * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference (mostly used for GEM
>> - * code to ensure the GTT or GT is on).
>> + * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference.
>>   *
>> - * It will _not_ power up the device but instead only check that it's powered
>> - * on.  Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
>> - * the device is known to be powered up and where trying to power it up would
>> - * result in hilarity and deadlocks. That pretty much means only the system
>> - * suspend/resume code where this is used to grab runtime pm references for
>> - * delayed setup down in work items.
>> + * It will _not_ resume the device but instead only get an extra wakeref.
>> + * Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
>> + * the device is known to be active and with another wakeref previously hold.
>>   *
>>   * Any runtime pm reference obtained by this function must have a symmetric
>>   * call to intel_runtime_pm_put() to release the reference again.
>> @@ -289,7 +285,7 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>>   */
>>  intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>>  {
>> -	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(rpm);
>> +	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
>>  	pm_runtime_get_noresume(rpm->kdev);
>>  
>>  	intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, true);
>> -- 
>> 2.44.0
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index 048943d0a881..03dc7edcc443 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -640,12 +640,6 @@  release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
 	enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
 	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
 
-	/*
-	 * The caller must hold already raw wakeref, upgrade that to a proper
-	 * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during
-	 * power well disabling.
-	 */
-	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
 	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(rpm);
 
 	for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index d4e844128826..2d0647aca964 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -272,15 +272,11 @@  intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
  * intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume - grab a runtime pm reference
  * @rpm: the intel_runtime_pm structure
  *
- * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference (mostly used for GEM
- * code to ensure the GTT or GT is on).
+ * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference.
  *
- * It will _not_ power up the device but instead only check that it's powered
- * on.  Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
- * the device is known to be powered up and where trying to power it up would
- * result in hilarity and deadlocks. That pretty much means only the system
- * suspend/resume code where this is used to grab runtime pm references for
- * delayed setup down in work items.
+ * It will _not_ resume the device but instead only get an extra wakeref.
+ * Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
+ * the device is known to be active and with another wakeref previously hold.
  *
  * Any runtime pm reference obtained by this function must have a symmetric
  * call to intel_runtime_pm_put() to release the reference again.
@@ -289,7 +285,7 @@  intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
  */
 intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
 {
-	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(rpm);
+	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
 	pm_runtime_get_noresume(rpm->kdev);
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, true);