diff mbox series

[v3] mm: memory: check userfaultfd_wp() in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp()

Message ID 20240422030039.3293568-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v3] mm: memory: check userfaultfd_wp() in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() | expand

Commit Message

Kefeng Wang April 22, 2024, 3 a.m. UTC 
Adding userfaultfd_wp() check in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() to avoid the
unnecessary FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID check/pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp()
in most pagefault, note, the function vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() is not
inlined in the two kernel versions, the difference is shown below,

perf date,

  perf report -i perf.data.before | grep vmf
     0.17%     0.13%  lat_pagefault  [kernel.kallsyms]      [k] vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.part.0.isra.0
  perf report -i perf.data.after  | grep vmf

lat_pagefault -W 5 -N 5 /tmp/XXX
  latency              before        after        diff
  average(8 tests)     0.262675      0.2600375   -0.0026375

Although it's a small, but the uffd_wp is a new feature than previous
kernel, when the vma is not registered with UFFD_WP, let's avoid to
execute the new logical, also adding __always_inline attribute to 
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(), which make set_pte_range() only check VM_UFFD_WP
flags without the function call. In addition, directly call the
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() in do_anonymous_page() and set_pte_range()
to save an uffd_wp variable.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
v3:
- move userfaultfd_wp() check uppper and add __always_inline to
  vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp()
- update changelog and add lat_pagefault results

 mm/memory.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Xu April 22, 2024, 12:18 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:00:39AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Adding userfaultfd_wp() check in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() to avoid the
> unnecessary FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID check/pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp()
> in most pagefault, note, the function vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() is not
> inlined in the two kernel versions, the difference is shown below,
> 
> perf date,
> 
>   perf report -i perf.data.before | grep vmf
>      0.17%     0.13%  lat_pagefault  [kernel.kallsyms]      [k] vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.part.0.isra.0
>   perf report -i perf.data.after  | grep vmf
> 
> lat_pagefault -W 5 -N 5 /tmp/XXX
>   latency              before        after        diff
>   average(8 tests)     0.262675      0.2600375   -0.0026375
> 
> Although it's a small, but the uffd_wp is a new feature than previous
> kernel, when the vma is not registered with UFFD_WP, let's avoid to
> execute the new logical, also adding __always_inline attribute to 
> vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(), which make set_pte_range() only check VM_UFFD_WP
> flags without the function call. In addition, directly call the
> vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() in do_anonymous_page() and set_pte_range()
> to save an uffd_wp variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d4e5cd9bc183..09ed76e5b8c0 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -112,8 +112,10 @@  static bool vmf_pte_changed(struct vm_fault *vmf);
  * Return true if the original pte was a uffd-wp pte marker (so the pte was
  * wr-protected).
  */
-static bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+static __always_inline bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	if (!userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma))
+		return false;
 	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID))
 		return false;
 
@@ -4388,7 +4390,6 @@  static struct folio *alloc_anon_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
  */
 static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf);
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	unsigned long addr = vmf->address;
 	struct folio *folio;
@@ -4488,7 +4489,7 @@  static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, addr);
 	folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
 setpte:
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf))
 		entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
 	set_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, vmf->pte, entry, nr_pages);
 
@@ -4663,7 +4664,6 @@  void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio,
 		struct page *page, unsigned int nr, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
-	bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf);
 	bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 	bool prefault = in_range(vmf->address, addr, nr * PAGE_SIZE);
 	pte_t entry;
@@ -4678,7 +4678,7 @@  void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio,
 
 	if (write)
 		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
-	if (unlikely(uffd_wp))
+	if (unlikely(vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf)))
 		entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
 	/* copy-on-write page */
 	if (write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {