diff mbox series

arch/Kconfig: Move SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS to arch/Kconfig

Message ID 20240423045548.1324969-1-song@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series arch/Kconfig: Move SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS to arch/Kconfig | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Song Liu April 23, 2024, 4:55 a.m. UTC
SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS is currently defined only for x86. As a result,
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS) is always false for other
archs. f337a6a21e2f effectively set "mitigations=off" by default on
non-x86 archs, which is not desired behavior. Jakub observed this
change when running bpf selftests on s390 and arm64.

Fix this by moving SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS to arch/Kconfig so that it is
available in all archs and thus can be used safely in kernel/cpu.c

Fixes: f337a6a21e2f ("x86/cpu: Actually turn off mitigations by default for SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
 arch/Kconfig     | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ----------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Sean Christopherson April 23, 2024, 2:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024, Song Liu wrote:
> SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS is currently defined only for x86. As a result,
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS) is always false for other
> archs. f337a6a21e2f effectively set "mitigations=off" by default on
> non-x86 archs, which is not desired behavior. Jakub observed this
> change when running bpf selftests on s390 and arm64.
> 
> Fix this by moving SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS to arch/Kconfig so that it is
> available in all archs and thus can be used safely in kernel/cpu.c

Yeah, it's a known issue that we've been slow to fix because we've haven't come
to an agreement on exactly what the Kconfig should look like[1], though there's
general consensus to add CPU_MITIGATIONS in common code[2][3].

I'll poke Josh's thread and make sure a fix gets into rc6.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417001507.2264512-2-seanjc@google.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240420000556.2645001-2-seanjc@google.com
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/9d3c997264829d0e2b28718222724ae8f9e7d8b4.1713559768.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 9f066785bb71..8f4af75005f8 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -1609,4 +1609,14 @@  config CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
 	# strict alignment always, even with -falign-functions.
 	def_bool CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT || CC_IS_CLANG
 
+menuconfig SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS
+	bool "Mitigations for speculative execution vulnerabilities"
+	default y
+	help
+	  Say Y here to enable options which enable mitigations for
+	  speculative execution hardware vulnerabilities.
+
+	  If you say N, all mitigations will be disabled. You really
+	  should know what you are doing to say so.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 39886bab943a..50c890fce5e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2486,16 +2486,6 @@  config PREFIX_SYMBOLS
 	def_bool y
 	depends on CALL_PADDING && !CFI_CLANG
 
-menuconfig SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS
-	bool "Mitigations for speculative execution vulnerabilities"
-	default y
-	help
-	  Say Y here to enable options which enable mitigations for
-	  speculative execution hardware vulnerabilities.
-
-	  If you say N, all mitigations will be disabled. You really
-	  should know what you are doing to say so.
-
 if SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS
 
 config MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION