Message ID | 20240420155904.1450768-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/bpf: Add ring_buffer__consume_n test. | expand |
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: > Add a testcase for the ring_buffer__consume_n() API. > > The test produces multiple samples in a ring buffer, using a > sys_getpid() fentry prog, and consumes them from user-space in batches, > rather than consuming all of them greedily, like ring_buffer__consume() > does. > SNIP > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c > index 48c5695b7abf..7e085bfce9b5 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include <linux/perf_event.h> > #include <linux/ring_buffer.h> > #include "test_ringbuf.lskel.h" > +#include "test_ringbuf_n.lskel.h" > #include "test_ringbuf_map_key.lskel.h" > > #define EDONE 7777 > @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ static int process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) > } > > static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key; > +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n; seems like there's no need for this to be static variable > static struct test_ringbuf_lskel *skel; > static struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; > > @@ -326,6 +328,67 @@ static void ringbuf_subtest(void) > test_ringbuf_lskel__destroy(skel); > } > > +/* > + * Test ring_buffer__consume_n() by producing N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring > + * buffer, via getpid(), and consuming them in chunks of N_SAMPLES. > + */ > +#define N_TOT_SAMPLES 32 > +#define N_SAMPLES 4 > + > +/* Sample value to verify the callback validity */ > +#define SAMPLE_VALUE 42L > + > +static int process_n_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) > +{ > + struct sample *s = data; > + > + CHECK(s->value != SAMPLE_VALUE, > + "sample_value", "exp %ld, got %ld\n", SAMPLE_VALUE, s->value); I think we should use ASSERT macros instead in the new code > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ringbuf_n_subtest(void) > +{ > + int err, i; > + > + skel_n = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_n, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open")) > + return; > + > + skel_n->maps.ringbuf.max_entries = getpagesize(); > + skel_n->bss->pid = getpid(); > + > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load(skel_n); > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd, > + process_n_sample, NULL, NULL); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ring_buffer__new")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach(skel_n); > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach")) > + goto cleanup_ringbuf; > + > + /* Produce N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring buffer by calling getpid() */ > + skel->bss->value = SAMPLE_VALUE; skel_n ? > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i++) > + syscall(__NR_getpgid); > + > + /* Consume all samples from the ring buffer in batches of N_SAMPLES */ > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i += err) { > + err = ring_buffer__consume_n(ringbuf, N_SAMPLES); > + ASSERT_EQ(err, N_SAMPLES, "rb_consume"); > + } > + SNIP > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..b98b5bb20699 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +// Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> > + > +#include <linux/bpf.h> > +#include <sched.h> > +#include <unistd.h> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> > +#include "bpf_misc.h" > + > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > + > +#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16 > + > +struct sample { > + int pid; > + int seq; seq does not seem to be checked, is it needed? jirka > + long value; > + char comm[16]; > +}; > + > +struct { > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF); > +} ringbuf SEC(".maps"); > + > +int pid = 0; > +long value = 0; > + > +/* inner state */ > +long seq = 0; > + > +SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") > +int test_ringbuf_n(void *ctx) > +{ > + int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; > + struct sample *sample; > + > + if (cur_pid != pid) > + return 0; > + > + sample = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&ringbuf, sizeof(*sample), 0); > + if (!sample) > + return 0; > + > + sample->pid = pid; > + sample->seq = seq++; > + sample->value = value; > + bpf_get_current_comm(sample->comm, sizeof(sample->comm)); > + > + bpf_ringbuf_submit(sample, 0); > + > + return 0; > +} > -- > 2.43.0 > >
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:11:33PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: ... > > static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key; > > +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n; > > seems like there's no need for this to be static variable Can you elaborate more? I think we want these pointers to be static to limit the scope to this file, no? > > > static struct test_ringbuf_lskel *skel; > > static struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; > > > > @@ -326,6 +328,67 @@ static void ringbuf_subtest(void) > > test_ringbuf_lskel__destroy(skel); > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Test ring_buffer__consume_n() by producing N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring > > + * buffer, via getpid(), and consuming them in chunks of N_SAMPLES. > > + */ > > +#define N_TOT_SAMPLES 32 > > +#define N_SAMPLES 4 > > + > > +/* Sample value to verify the callback validity */ > > +#define SAMPLE_VALUE 42L > > + > > +static int process_n_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) > > +{ > > + struct sample *s = data; > > + > > + CHECK(s->value != SAMPLE_VALUE, > > + "sample_value", "exp %ld, got %ld\n", SAMPLE_VALUE, s->value); > > I think we should use ASSERT macros instead in the new code Good catch, I'll change this to an ASSERT_EQ(). > > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void ringbuf_n_subtest(void) > > +{ > > + int err, i; > > + > > + skel_n = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open(); > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_n, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open")) > > + return; > > + > > + skel_n->maps.ringbuf.max_entries = getpagesize(); > > + skel_n->bss->pid = getpid(); > > + > > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load(skel_n); > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd, > > + process_n_sample, NULL, NULL); > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ring_buffer__new")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach(skel_n); > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach")) > > + goto cleanup_ringbuf; > > + > > + /* Produce N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring buffer by calling getpid() */ > > + skel->bss->value = SAMPLE_VALUE; > > skel_n ? Absolutely... I'm suprised that it works actually, I guess pure luck (unluck) to reuse the old pointer and have value mapped to the same location. Anyway, I'll fix this. > > > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i++) > > + syscall(__NR_getpgid); > > + > > + /* Consume all samples from the ring buffer in batches of N_SAMPLES */ > > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i += err) { > > + err = ring_buffer__consume_n(ringbuf, N_SAMPLES); > > + ASSERT_EQ(err, N_SAMPLES, "rb_consume"); > > + } > > + > > SNIP > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..b98b5bb20699 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +// Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> > > + > > +#include <linux/bpf.h> > > +#include <sched.h> > > +#include <unistd.h> > > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> > > +#include "bpf_misc.h" > > + > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > > + > > +#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16 > > + > > +struct sample { > > + int pid; > > + int seq; > > seq does not seem to be checked, is it needed? seq is not used at all, I can definitely drop it. Thanks for the review! I'll send a v2. -Andrea
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:19:04AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:11:33PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > ... > > > static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key; > > > +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n; > > > > seems like there's no need for this to be static variable > > Can you elaborate more? I think we want these pointers to be static to > limit the scope to this file, no? I meant to move it directly inside ringbuf_n_subtest function, I don't see reason why it's defined outside of that function jirka > > > > > > static struct test_ringbuf_lskel *skel; > > > static struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; > > > > > > @@ -326,6 +328,67 @@ static void ringbuf_subtest(void) > > > test_ringbuf_lskel__destroy(skel); > > > } > > > > > > +/* > > > + * Test ring_buffer__consume_n() by producing N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring > > > + * buffer, via getpid(), and consuming them in chunks of N_SAMPLES. > > > + */ > > > +#define N_TOT_SAMPLES 32 > > > +#define N_SAMPLES 4 > > > + > > > +/* Sample value to verify the callback validity */ > > > +#define SAMPLE_VALUE 42L > > > + > > > +static int process_n_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) > > > +{ > > > + struct sample *s = data; > > > + > > > + CHECK(s->value != SAMPLE_VALUE, > > > + "sample_value", "exp %ld, got %ld\n", SAMPLE_VALUE, s->value); > > > > I think we should use ASSERT macros instead in the new code > > Good catch, I'll change this to an ASSERT_EQ(). > > > > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void ringbuf_n_subtest(void) > > > +{ > > > + int err, i; > > > + > > > + skel_n = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open(); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_n, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open")) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + skel_n->maps.ringbuf.max_entries = getpagesize(); > > > + skel_n->bss->pid = getpid(); > > > + > > > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load(skel_n); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd, > > > + process_n_sample, NULL, NULL); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ring_buffer__new")) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach(skel_n); > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach")) > > > + goto cleanup_ringbuf; > > > + > > > + /* Produce N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring buffer by calling getpid() */ > > > + skel->bss->value = SAMPLE_VALUE; > > > > skel_n ? > > Absolutely... I'm suprised that it works actually, I guess pure luck > (unluck) to reuse the old pointer and have value mapped to the same > location. Anyway, I'll fix this. > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i++) > > > + syscall(__NR_getpgid); > > > + > > > + /* Consume all samples from the ring buffer in batches of N_SAMPLES */ > > > + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i += err) { > > > + err = ring_buffer__consume_n(ringbuf, N_SAMPLES); > > > + ASSERT_EQ(err, N_SAMPLES, "rb_consume"); > > > + } > > > + > > > > SNIP > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..b98b5bb20699 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +// Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> > > > + > > > +#include <linux/bpf.h> > > > +#include <sched.h> > > > +#include <unistd.h> > > > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> > > > +#include "bpf_misc.h" > > > + > > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > > > + > > > +#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16 > > > + > > > +struct sample { > > > + int pid; > > > + int seq; > > > > seq does not seem to be checked, is it needed? > > seq is not used at all, I can definitely drop it. > > Thanks for the review! I'll send a v2. > > -Andrea
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:23:30PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:19:04AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:11:33PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > ... > > > > static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key; > > > > +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n; > > > > > > seems like there's no need for this to be static variable > > > > Can you elaborate more? I think we want these pointers to be static to > > limit the scope to this file, no? > > I meant to move it directly inside ringbuf_n_subtest function, > I don't see reason why it's defined outside of that function Oh I see! Yeah, that makes sense, I'll send a v3 soon. Thanks, -Andrea
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index edc73f8f5aef..6332277edeca 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ LINKED_SKELS := test_static_linked.skel.h linked_funcs.skel.h \ LSKELS := fentry_test.c fexit_test.c fexit_sleep.c atomics.c \ trace_printk.c trace_vprintk.c map_ptr_kern.c \ core_kern.c core_kern_overflow.c test_ringbuf.c \ - test_ringbuf_map_key.c + test_ringbuf_n.c test_ringbuf_map_key.c # Generate both light skeleton and libbpf skeleton for these LSKELS_EXTRA := test_ksyms_module.c test_ksyms_weak.c kfunc_call_test.c \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c index 48c5695b7abf..7e085bfce9b5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/perf_event.h> #include <linux/ring_buffer.h> #include "test_ringbuf.lskel.h" +#include "test_ringbuf_n.lskel.h" #include "test_ringbuf_map_key.lskel.h" #define EDONE 7777 @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ static int process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) } static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key; +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n; static struct test_ringbuf_lskel *skel; static struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; @@ -326,6 +328,67 @@ static void ringbuf_subtest(void) test_ringbuf_lskel__destroy(skel); } +/* + * Test ring_buffer__consume_n() by producing N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring + * buffer, via getpid(), and consuming them in chunks of N_SAMPLES. + */ +#define N_TOT_SAMPLES 32 +#define N_SAMPLES 4 + +/* Sample value to verify the callback validity */ +#define SAMPLE_VALUE 42L + +static int process_n_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) +{ + struct sample *s = data; + + CHECK(s->value != SAMPLE_VALUE, + "sample_value", "exp %ld, got %ld\n", SAMPLE_VALUE, s->value); + + return 0; +} + +static void ringbuf_n_subtest(void) +{ + int err, i; + + skel_n = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_n, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open")) + return; + + skel_n->maps.ringbuf.max_entries = getpagesize(); + skel_n->bss->pid = getpid(); + + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load(skel_n); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load")) + goto cleanup; + + ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd, + process_n_sample, NULL, NULL); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ring_buffer__new")) + goto cleanup; + + err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach(skel_n); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach")) + goto cleanup_ringbuf; + + /* Produce N_TOT_SAMPLES samples in the ring buffer by calling getpid() */ + skel->bss->value = SAMPLE_VALUE; + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i++) + syscall(__NR_getpgid); + + /* Consume all samples from the ring buffer in batches of N_SAMPLES */ + for (i = 0; i < N_TOT_SAMPLES; i += err) { + err = ring_buffer__consume_n(ringbuf, N_SAMPLES); + ASSERT_EQ(err, N_SAMPLES, "rb_consume"); + } + +cleanup_ringbuf: + ring_buffer__free(ringbuf); +cleanup: + test_ringbuf_n_lskel__destroy(skel_n); +} + static int process_map_key_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) { struct sample *s; @@ -384,6 +447,8 @@ void test_ringbuf(void) { if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf")) ringbuf_subtest(); + if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_n")) + ringbuf_n_subtest(); if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_map_key")) ringbuf_map_key_subtest(); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b98b5bb20699 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> + +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <sched.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include "bpf_misc.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16 + +struct sample { + int pid; + int seq; + long value; + char comm[16]; +}; + +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF); +} ringbuf SEC(".maps"); + +int pid = 0; +long value = 0; + +/* inner state */ +long seq = 0; + +SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") +int test_ringbuf_n(void *ctx) +{ + int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; + struct sample *sample; + + if (cur_pid != pid) + return 0; + + sample = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&ringbuf, sizeof(*sample), 0); + if (!sample) + return 0; + + sample->pid = pid; + sample->seq = seq++; + sample->value = value; + bpf_get_current_comm(sample->comm, sizeof(sample->comm)); + + bpf_ringbuf_submit(sample, 0); + + return 0; +}
Add a testcase for the ring_buffer__consume_n() API. The test produces multiple samples in a ring buffer, using a sys_getpid() fentry prog, and consumes them from user-space in batches, rather than consuming all of them greedily, like ring_buffer__consume() does. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAEf4BzaR4zqUpDmj44KNLdpJ=Tpa97GrvzuzVNO5nM6b7oWd1w@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c | 52 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_n.c