Message ID | 20240409203411.1885121-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 04890641bf1fc9835e651c70ed7e1b520dd77285 |
Headers | show |
Series | [f2fs-dev,1/3] f2fs: use folio_test_writeback | expand |
On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > not the corruption case. In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? Thanks, > > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > --- > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > break; > case META_SIT: > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) > - goto err; > + goto check_only; > break; > case META_SSA: > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || > blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) > - goto err; > + goto check_only; > break; > case META_CP: > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || > blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) > - goto err; > + goto check_only; > break; > case META_POR: > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || > blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) > - goto err; > + goto check_only; > break; > case DATA_GENERIC: > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: > @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > return true; > err: > f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); > +check_only: > return false; > } >
On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > > not the corruption case. > > In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this patch. > > Thanks, > > > > > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > break; > > case META_SIT: > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) > > - goto err; > > + goto check_only; > > break; > > case META_SSA: > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) > > - goto err; > > + goto check_only; > > break; > > case META_CP: > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || > > blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) > > - goto err; > > + goto check_only; > > break; > > case META_POR: > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) > > - goto err; > > + goto check_only; > > break; > > case DATA_GENERIC: > > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: > > @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > return true; > > err: > > f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); > > +check_only: > > return false; > > }
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:57 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > > > not the corruption case. > > > > In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? In my case, it seems like it's META_SIT, and it's triggered right after mount. fsck detects invalid_blkaddr, and when the kernel mounts it, it immediately flags invalid_blkaddr again: [ 6.333498] init: [libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c 10000 --debug-cache /dev/block/sda13 [ 6.337671] fsck.f2fs: Info: Fix the reported corruption. [ 6.337947] fsck.f2fs: Info: not exist /proc/version! [ 6.338010] fsck.f2fs: Info: can't find /sys, assuming normal block device [ 6.338294] fsck.f2fs: Info: MKFS version [ 6.338319] fsck.f2fs: "5.10.160-android12-9-ge5cfec41c8e2" [ 6.338366] fsck.f2fs: Info: FSCK version [ 6.338380] fsck.f2fs: from "5.10-arter97" [ 6.338393] fsck.f2fs: to "5.10-arter97" [ 6.338414] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 : encrypt verity extra_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold [ 6.338429] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt = 00000000000000000000000000000000 [ 6.338442] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint stop reason: shutdown(180) [ 6.338455] fsck.f2fs: Info: fs errors: invalid_blkaddr [ 6.338468] fsck.f2fs: Info: Segments per section = 1 [ 6.338480] fsck.f2fs: Info: Sections per zone = 1 [ 6.338492] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 58971571 (230357 MB) [ 6.340599] fsck.f2fs: Info: CKPT version = 2b7e3b29 [ 6.340620] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 19789296, prev: 18407008 [ 6.677041] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint state = 46 : crc compacted_summary orphan_inodes sudden-power-off [ 6.677052] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 1 / 712937 (0.00%) [ 8.997922] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 71294 / 712937 (10.00%) [ 10.629205] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 142587 / 712937 (20.00%) [ 12.278186] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 213880 / 712937 (30.00%) [ 13.768177] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 285173 / 712937 (40.00%) [ 17.446971] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 356466 / 712937 (50.00%) [ 19.891623] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 427759 / 712937 (60.00%) [ 23.251327] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 499052 / 712937 (70.00%) [ 28.493457] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 570345 / 712937 (80.00%) [ 29.640800] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 641638 / 712937 (90.00%) [ 30.718347] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 712931 / 712937 (100.00%) [ 30.724176] fsck.f2fs: [ 30.737160] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Max image size: 167506 MB, Free space: 62850 MB [ 30.737164] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries [Ok..] [0x0] [ 30.737638] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking [Ok..] [ 30.737640] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file [Ok..] [0xd] [ 30.737641] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP [Ok..] [0x28b98e6] [ 30.737644] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (de lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] [ 30.737646] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (nat lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] [ 30.737647] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP [Ok..] [0xa74a3] [ 30.737649] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP [Ok..] [0x7aa3] [ 30.737662] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] next block offset is free [Ok..] [ 30.737663] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] fixing SIT types [ 30.737867] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] other corrupted bugs [Ok..] [ 30.737893] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 765] Info: Done to update superblock [ 30.960610] fsck.f2fs: [ 30.960618] fsck.f2fs: Done: 24.622956 secs [ 30.960620] fsck.f2fs: [ 30.960622] fsck.f2fs: c, u, RA, CH, CM, Repl= [ 30.960627] fsck.f2fs: 10000 10000 43600517 42605434 995083 985083 [ 30.963274] F2FS-fs (sda13): Using encoding defined by superblock: utf8-12.1.0 with flags 0x0 [ 30.995360] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr: type=2 (Manually added that print ^) [ 30.995369] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 30.995375] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c [ 30.995378] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W 5.10.209-arter97-r15-kernelsu-g0867d0e4f1d2 #6 [ 30.995379] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Cape QRD with PM8010 (DT) [ 30.995380] pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--) [ 30.995382] pc : f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c [ 30.995384] lr : __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 [ 30.995385] sp : ffffff80209e79b0 [ 30.995386] x29: ffffff80209e79b0 x28: 0000000000000037 [ 30.995388] x27: 00000000000001c7 x26: 0000000020120121 [ 30.995389] x25: 00000000000000d9 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 30.995390] x23: ffffffff00f1a700 x22: 0000000000000828 [ 30.995391] x21: ffffff80462aa000 x20: ffffff80462aa000 [ 30.995392] x19: 0000000000000002 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 30.995393] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000ffff0000 [ 30.995394] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd1675ac6d0 [ 30.995395] x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 30.995396] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: 0000000000000000 [ 30.995397] x9 : 0000000100000001 x8 : 0000000100000000 [ 30.995398] x7 : 64696c61765f7369 x6 : ffffffd1681279e8 [ 30.995399] x5 : 000000000000001f x4 : 0000000000000001 [ 30.995400] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffff89f03dedc8 [ 30.995401] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffff80462aa000 [ 30.995403] Call trace: [ 30.995404] f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c [ 30.995405] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 [ 30.995406] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x10/0x20 [ 30.995407] f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xe0/0x230 [ 30.995409] build_sit_entries+0xa8/0x580 [ 30.995411] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x124/0x170 [ 30.995412] f2fs_fill_super+0x78c/0xd1c [ 30.995415] mount_bdev+0x168/0x1ac [ 30.995416] f2fs_mount+0x18/0x24 [ 30.995418] legacy_get_tree.llvm.9147845779559715083+0x30/0x5c [ 30.995419] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0xe0 [ 30.995421] do_new_mount+0x140/0x358 [ 30.995422] path_mount+0x1fc/0x4e8 [ 30.995423] __arm64_sys_mount+0x150/0x294 [ 30.995425] el0_svc_common.llvm.15698454952154965787+0xa8/0x138 [ 30.995426] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90 [ 30.995429] el0_svc+0x10/0x1c [ 30.995430] el0_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe4 [ 30.995432] el0_sync+0x1a0/0x1c0 [ 30.995433] ---[ end trace 3b83295e0cdac94e ]--- [ 31.005011] F2FS-fs (sda13): Mounted with checkpoint version = 2b7e3b29 [ 31.005176] init: [libfs_mgr] __mount(source=/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/userdata,target=/data,type=f2fs)=0: Success [ 31.007749] init: Userdata mounted using /vendor/etc/fstab.qcom result : 0 I was bisecting a long boot time (24 additional seconds) issue, which is always reproducible, and found commit 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") to be causing it. I'll just revert that patch locally. Seems like Jaegeuk's dev branch doesn't have the fix for this specifically yet. Thanks. > > I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this > patch. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > break; > > > case META_SIT: > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) > > > - goto err; > > > + goto check_only; > > > break; > > > case META_SSA: > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > > blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) > > > - goto err; > > > + goto check_only; > > > break; > > > case META_CP: > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || > > > blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) > > > - goto err; > > > + goto check_only; > > > break; > > > case META_POR: > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > > blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) > > > - goto err; > > > + goto check_only; > > > break; > > > case DATA_GENERIC: > > > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: > > > @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > return true; > > > err: > > > f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); > > > +check_only: > > > return false; > > > } > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On 04/19, Juhyung Park wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:57 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote: > > > On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > > > > not the corruption case. > > > > > > In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? > > In my case, it seems like it's META_SIT, and it's triggered right after mount. > fsck detects invalid_blkaddr, and when the kernel mounts it, it > immediately flags invalid_blkaddr again: > > [ 6.333498] init: [libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c > 10000 --debug-cache /dev/block/sda13 > [ 6.337671] fsck.f2fs: Info: Fix the reported corruption. > [ 6.337947] fsck.f2fs: Info: not exist /proc/version! > [ 6.338010] fsck.f2fs: Info: can't find /sys, assuming normal block device > [ 6.338294] fsck.f2fs: Info: MKFS version > [ 6.338319] fsck.f2fs: "5.10.160-android12-9-ge5cfec41c8e2" > [ 6.338366] fsck.f2fs: Info: FSCK version > [ 6.338380] fsck.f2fs: from "5.10-arter97" > [ 6.338393] fsck.f2fs: to "5.10-arter97" > [ 6.338414] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 : encrypt > verity extra_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold > [ 6.338429] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt = > 00000000000000000000000000000000 > [ 6.338442] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint stop reason: shutdown(180) > [ 6.338455] fsck.f2fs: Info: fs errors: invalid_blkaddr > [ 6.338468] fsck.f2fs: Info: Segments per section = 1 > [ 6.338480] fsck.f2fs: Info: Sections per zone = 1 > [ 6.338492] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 58971571 (230357 MB) > [ 6.340599] fsck.f2fs: Info: CKPT version = 2b7e3b29 > [ 6.340620] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 19789296, prev: 18407008 > [ 6.677041] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint state = 46 : crc > compacted_summary orphan_inodes sudden-power-off > [ 6.677052] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 1 / 712937 (0.00%) > [ 8.997922] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 71294 / 712937 (10.00%) > [ 10.629205] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 142587 / 712937 (20.00%) > [ 12.278186] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 213880 / 712937 (30.00%) > [ 13.768177] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 285173 / 712937 (40.00%) > [ 17.446971] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 356466 / 712937 (50.00%) > [ 19.891623] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 427759 / 712937 (60.00%) > [ 23.251327] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 499052 / 712937 (70.00%) > [ 28.493457] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 570345 / 712937 (80.00%) > [ 29.640800] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 641638 / 712937 (90.00%) > [ 30.718347] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 712931 / 712937 (100.00%) > [ 30.724176] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.737160] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Max image size: 167506 MB, Free space: 62850 MB > [ 30.737164] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries > [Ok..] [0x0] > [ 30.737638] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking > [Ok..] > [ 30.737640] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file > [Ok..] [0xd] > [ 30.737641] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP > [Ok..] [0x28b98e6] > [ 30.737644] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (de > lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > [ 30.737646] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP > (nat lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > [ 30.737647] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP > [Ok..] [0xa74a3] > [ 30.737649] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP > [Ok..] [0x7aa3] > [ 30.737662] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] next block offset is free > [Ok..] > [ 30.737663] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] fixing SIT types > [ 30.737867] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] other corrupted bugs > [Ok..] > [ 30.737893] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 765] Info: Done to > update superblock > [ 30.960610] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.960618] fsck.f2fs: Done: 24.622956 secs > [ 30.960620] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.960622] fsck.f2fs: c, u, RA, CH, CM, Repl= > [ 30.960627] fsck.f2fs: 10000 10000 43600517 42605434 995083 985083 > [ 30.963274] F2FS-fs (sda13): Using encoding defined by superblock: > utf8-12.1.0 with flags 0x0 > [ 30.995360] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr: type=2 > > (Manually added that print ^) > > [ 30.995369] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 30.995375] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995378] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W > 5.10.209-arter97-r15-kernelsu-g0867d0e4f1d2 #6 > [ 30.995379] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Cape QRD > with PM8010 (DT) > [ 30.995380] pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--) > [ 30.995382] pc : f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995384] lr : __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > [ 30.995385] sp : ffffff80209e79b0 > [ 30.995386] x29: ffffff80209e79b0 x28: 0000000000000037 > [ 30.995388] x27: 00000000000001c7 x26: 0000000020120121 > [ 30.995389] x25: 00000000000000d9 x24: 0000000000000000 > [ 30.995390] x23: ffffffff00f1a700 x22: 0000000000000828 > [ 30.995391] x21: ffffff80462aa000 x20: ffffff80462aa000 > [ 30.995392] x19: 0000000000000002 x18: ffffffffffffffff > [ 30.995393] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000ffff0000 > [ 30.995394] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd1675ac6d0 > [ 30.995395] x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003 > [ 30.995396] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: 0000000000000000 > [ 30.995397] x9 : 0000000100000001 x8 : 0000000100000000 > [ 30.995398] x7 : 64696c61765f7369 x6 : ffffffd1681279e8 > [ 30.995399] x5 : 000000000000001f x4 : 0000000000000001 > [ 30.995400] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffff89f03dedc8 > [ 30.995401] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffff80462aa000 > [ 30.995403] Call trace: > [ 30.995404] f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995405] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > [ 30.995406] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x10/0x20 > [ 30.995407] f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xe0/0x230 > [ 30.995409] build_sit_entries+0xa8/0x580 > [ 30.995411] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x124/0x170 > [ 30.995412] f2fs_fill_super+0x78c/0xd1c > [ 30.995415] mount_bdev+0x168/0x1ac > [ 30.995416] f2fs_mount+0x18/0x24 > [ 30.995418] legacy_get_tree.llvm.9147845779559715083+0x30/0x5c > [ 30.995419] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0xe0 > [ 30.995421] do_new_mount+0x140/0x358 > [ 30.995422] path_mount+0x1fc/0x4e8 > [ 30.995423] __arm64_sys_mount+0x150/0x294 > [ 30.995425] el0_svc_common.llvm.15698454952154965787+0xa8/0x138 > [ 30.995426] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90 > [ 30.995429] el0_svc+0x10/0x1c > [ 30.995430] el0_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe4 > [ 30.995432] el0_sync+0x1a0/0x1c0 > [ 30.995433] ---[ end trace 3b83295e0cdac94e ]--- > [ 31.005011] F2FS-fs (sda13): Mounted with checkpoint version = 2b7e3b29 > [ 31.005176] init: [libfs_mgr] > __mount(source=/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/userdata,target=/data,type=f2fs)=0: > Success > [ 31.007749] init: Userdata mounted using /vendor/etc/fstab.qcom result : 0 > > > I was bisecting a long boot time (24 additional seconds) issue, which > is always reproducible, and found commit 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify > the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") to be causing it. > > I'll just revert that patch locally. Seems like Jaegeuk's dev branch > doesn't have the fix for this specifically yet. I was suspecting f2fs_ra_meta_pages() could try to read out beyond the boundary before, but it seems you hit the case. Can you check this patch address that? > > Thanks. > > > > > I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this > > patch. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > > index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > > @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > > break; > > > > case META_SIT: > > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) > > > > - goto err; > > > > + goto check_only; > > > > break; > > > > case META_SSA: > > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > > > blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) > > > > - goto err; > > > > + goto check_only; > > > > break; > > > > case META_CP: > > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || > > > > blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) > > > > - goto err; > > > > + goto check_only; > > > > break; > > > > case META_POR: > > > > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || > > > > blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) > > > > - goto err; > > > > + goto check_only; > > > > break; > > > > case DATA_GENERIC: > > > > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: > > > > @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > > return true; > > > > err: > > > > f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); > > > > +check_only: > > > > return false; > > > > } > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On 2024/4/19 18:27, Juhyung Park wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:57 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote: >>> On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>> f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is >>>> not the corruption case. >>> >>> In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? > > In my case, it seems like it's META_SIT, and it's triggered right after mount. Ah, I see, actually it hits at this case, thanks for the information. Thanks, > fsck detects invalid_blkaddr, and when the kernel mounts it, it > immediately flags invalid_blkaddr again: > > [ 6.333498] init: [libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c > 10000 --debug-cache /dev/block/sda13 > [ 6.337671] fsck.f2fs: Info: Fix the reported corruption. > [ 6.337947] fsck.f2fs: Info: not exist /proc/version! > [ 6.338010] fsck.f2fs: Info: can't find /sys, assuming normal block device > [ 6.338294] fsck.f2fs: Info: MKFS version > [ 6.338319] fsck.f2fs: "5.10.160-android12-9-ge5cfec41c8e2" > [ 6.338366] fsck.f2fs: Info: FSCK version > [ 6.338380] fsck.f2fs: from "5.10-arter97" > [ 6.338393] fsck.f2fs: to "5.10-arter97" > [ 6.338414] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 : encrypt > verity extra_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold > [ 6.338429] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt = > 00000000000000000000000000000000 > [ 6.338442] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint stop reason: shutdown(180) > [ 6.338455] fsck.f2fs: Info: fs errors: invalid_blkaddr > [ 6.338468] fsck.f2fs: Info: Segments per section = 1 > [ 6.338480] fsck.f2fs: Info: Sections per zone = 1 > [ 6.338492] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 58971571 (230357 MB) > [ 6.340599] fsck.f2fs: Info: CKPT version = 2b7e3b29 > [ 6.340620] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 19789296, prev: 18407008 > [ 6.677041] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint state = 46 : crc > compacted_summary orphan_inodes sudden-power-off > [ 6.677052] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 1 / 712937 (0.00%) > [ 8.997922] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 71294 / 712937 (10.00%) > [ 10.629205] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 142587 / 712937 (20.00%) > [ 12.278186] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 213880 / 712937 (30.00%) > [ 13.768177] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 285173 / 712937 (40.00%) > [ 17.446971] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 356466 / 712937 (50.00%) > [ 19.891623] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 427759 / 712937 (60.00%) > [ 23.251327] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 499052 / 712937 (70.00%) > [ 28.493457] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 570345 / 712937 (80.00%) > [ 29.640800] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 641638 / 712937 (90.00%) > [ 30.718347] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 712931 / 712937 (100.00%) > [ 30.724176] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.737160] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Max image size: 167506 MB, Free space: 62850 MB > [ 30.737164] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries > [Ok..] [0x0] > [ 30.737638] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking > [Ok..] > [ 30.737640] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file > [Ok..] [0xd] > [ 30.737641] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP > [Ok..] [0x28b98e6] > [ 30.737644] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (de > lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > [ 30.737646] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP > (nat lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > [ 30.737647] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP > [Ok..] [0xa74a3] > [ 30.737649] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP > [Ok..] [0x7aa3] > [ 30.737662] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] next block offset is free > [Ok..] > [ 30.737663] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] fixing SIT types > [ 30.737867] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] other corrupted bugs > [Ok..] > [ 30.737893] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 765] Info: Done to > update superblock > [ 30.960610] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.960618] fsck.f2fs: Done: 24.622956 secs > [ 30.960620] fsck.f2fs: > [ 30.960622] fsck.f2fs: c, u, RA, CH, CM, Repl= > [ 30.960627] fsck.f2fs: 10000 10000 43600517 42605434 995083 985083 > [ 30.963274] F2FS-fs (sda13): Using encoding defined by superblock: > utf8-12.1.0 with flags 0x0 > [ 30.995360] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr: type=2 > > (Manually added that print ^) > > [ 30.995369] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 30.995375] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995378] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W > 5.10.209-arter97-r15-kernelsu-g0867d0e4f1d2 #6 > [ 30.995379] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Cape QRD > with PM8010 (DT) > [ 30.995380] pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--) > [ 30.995382] pc : f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995384] lr : __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > [ 30.995385] sp : ffffff80209e79b0 > [ 30.995386] x29: ffffff80209e79b0 x28: 0000000000000037 > [ 30.995388] x27: 00000000000001c7 x26: 0000000020120121 > [ 30.995389] x25: 00000000000000d9 x24: 0000000000000000 > [ 30.995390] x23: ffffffff00f1a700 x22: 0000000000000828 > [ 30.995391] x21: ffffff80462aa000 x20: ffffff80462aa000 > [ 30.995392] x19: 0000000000000002 x18: ffffffffffffffff > [ 30.995393] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000ffff0000 > [ 30.995394] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd1675ac6d0 > [ 30.995395] x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003 > [ 30.995396] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: 0000000000000000 > [ 30.995397] x9 : 0000000100000001 x8 : 0000000100000000 > [ 30.995398] x7 : 64696c61765f7369 x6 : ffffffd1681279e8 > [ 30.995399] x5 : 000000000000001f x4 : 0000000000000001 > [ 30.995400] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffff89f03dedc8 > [ 30.995401] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffff80462aa000 > [ 30.995403] Call trace: > [ 30.995404] f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > [ 30.995405] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > [ 30.995406] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x10/0x20 > [ 30.995407] f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xe0/0x230 > [ 30.995409] build_sit_entries+0xa8/0x580 > [ 30.995411] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x124/0x170 > [ 30.995412] f2fs_fill_super+0x78c/0xd1c > [ 30.995415] mount_bdev+0x168/0x1ac > [ 30.995416] f2fs_mount+0x18/0x24 > [ 30.995418] legacy_get_tree.llvm.9147845779559715083+0x30/0x5c > [ 30.995419] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0xe0 > [ 30.995421] do_new_mount+0x140/0x358 > [ 30.995422] path_mount+0x1fc/0x4e8 > [ 30.995423] __arm64_sys_mount+0x150/0x294 > [ 30.995425] el0_svc_common.llvm.15698454952154965787+0xa8/0x138 > [ 30.995426] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90 > [ 30.995429] el0_svc+0x10/0x1c > [ 30.995430] el0_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe4 > [ 30.995432] el0_sync+0x1a0/0x1c0 > [ 30.995433] ---[ end trace 3b83295e0cdac94e ]--- > [ 31.005011] F2FS-fs (sda13): Mounted with checkpoint version = 2b7e3b29 > [ 31.005176] init: [libfs_mgr] > __mount(source=/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/userdata,target=/data,type=f2fs)=0: > Success > [ 31.007749] init: Userdata mounted using /vendor/etc/fstab.qcom result : 0 > > > I was bisecting a long boot time (24 additional seconds) issue, which > is always reproducible, and found commit 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify > the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") to be causing it. > > I'll just revert that patch locally. Seems like Jaegeuk's dev branch > doesn't have the fix for this specifically yet. > > Thanks. > >> >> I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this >> patch. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>>> >>>> Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> >>>> --- >>>> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >>>> index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >>>> @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>> break; >>>> case META_SIT: >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) >>>> - goto err; >>>> + goto check_only; >>>> break; >>>> case META_SSA: >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || >>>> blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) >>>> - goto err; >>>> + goto check_only; >>>> break; >>>> case META_CP: >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || >>>> blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) >>>> - goto err; >>>> + goto check_only; >>>> break; >>>> case META_POR: >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || >>>> blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) >>>> - goto err; >>>> + goto check_only; >>>> break; >>>> case DATA_GENERIC: >>>> case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: >>>> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>> return true; >>>> err: >>>> f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); >>>> +check_only: >>>> return false; >>>> } >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list >> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:30 AM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 2024/4/19 18:27, Juhyung Park wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:57 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote: > >>> On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is > >>>> not the corruption case. > >>> > >>> In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR? > > > > In my case, it seems like it's META_SIT, and it's triggered right after mount. > > Ah, I see, actually it hits at this case, thanks for the information. > > Thanks, > > > fsck detects invalid_blkaddr, and when the kernel mounts it, it > > immediately flags invalid_blkaddr again: > > > > [ 6.333498] init: [libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c > > 10000 --debug-cache /dev/block/sda13 > > [ 6.337671] fsck.f2fs: Info: Fix the reported corruption. > > [ 6.337947] fsck.f2fs: Info: not exist /proc/version! > > [ 6.338010] fsck.f2fs: Info: can't find /sys, assuming normal block device > > [ 6.338294] fsck.f2fs: Info: MKFS version > > [ 6.338319] fsck.f2fs: "5.10.160-android12-9-ge5cfec41c8e2" > > [ 6.338366] fsck.f2fs: Info: FSCK version > > [ 6.338380] fsck.f2fs: from "5.10-arter97" > > [ 6.338393] fsck.f2fs: to "5.10-arter97" > > [ 6.338414] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 : encrypt > > verity extra_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold > > [ 6.338429] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt = > > 00000000000000000000000000000000 > > [ 6.338442] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint stop reason: shutdown(180) > > [ 6.338455] fsck.f2fs: Info: fs errors: invalid_blkaddr > > [ 6.338468] fsck.f2fs: Info: Segments per section = 1 > > [ 6.338480] fsck.f2fs: Info: Sections per zone = 1 > > [ 6.338492] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 58971571 (230357 MB) > > [ 6.340599] fsck.f2fs: Info: CKPT version = 2b7e3b29 > > [ 6.340620] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 19789296, prev: 18407008 > > [ 6.677041] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint state = 46 : crc > > compacted_summary orphan_inodes sudden-power-off > > [ 6.677052] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 1 / 712937 (0.00%) > > [ 8.997922] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 71294 / 712937 (10.00%) > > [ 10.629205] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 142587 / 712937 (20.00%) > > [ 12.278186] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 213880 / 712937 (30.00%) > > [ 13.768177] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 285173 / 712937 (40.00%) > > [ 17.446971] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 356466 / 712937 (50.00%) > > [ 19.891623] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 427759 / 712937 (60.00%) > > [ 23.251327] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 499052 / 712937 (70.00%) > > [ 28.493457] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 570345 / 712937 (80.00%) > > [ 29.640800] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 641638 / 712937 (90.00%) > > [ 30.718347] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 712931 / 712937 (100.00%) > > [ 30.724176] fsck.f2fs: > > [ 30.737160] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Max image size: 167506 MB, Free space: 62850 MB > > [ 30.737164] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries > > [Ok..] [0x0] > > [ 30.737638] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking > > [Ok..] > > [ 30.737640] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file > > [Ok..] [0xd] > > [ 30.737641] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP > > [Ok..] [0x28b98e6] > > [ 30.737644] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (de > > lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > > [ 30.737646] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP > > (nat lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9] > > [ 30.737647] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP > > [Ok..] [0xa74a3] > > [ 30.737649] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP > > [Ok..] [0x7aa3] > > [ 30.737662] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] next block offset is free > > [Ok..] > > [ 30.737663] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] fixing SIT types > > [ 30.737867] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] other corrupted bugs > > [Ok..] > > [ 30.737893] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 765] Info: Done to > > update superblock > > [ 30.960610] fsck.f2fs: > > [ 30.960618] fsck.f2fs: Done: 24.622956 secs > > [ 30.960620] fsck.f2fs: > > [ 30.960622] fsck.f2fs: c, u, RA, CH, CM, Repl= > > [ 30.960627] fsck.f2fs: 10000 10000 43600517 42605434 995083 985083 > > [ 30.963274] F2FS-fs (sda13): Using encoding defined by superblock: > > utf8-12.1.0 with flags 0x0 > > [ 30.995360] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr: type=2 > > > > (Manually added that print ^) > > > > [ 30.995369] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 30.995375] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > > [ 30.995378] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W > > 5.10.209-arter97-r15-kernelsu-g0867d0e4f1d2 #6 > > [ 30.995379] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Cape QRD > > with PM8010 (DT) > > [ 30.995380] pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--) > > [ 30.995382] pc : f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > > [ 30.995384] lr : __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > > [ 30.995385] sp : ffffff80209e79b0 > > [ 30.995386] x29: ffffff80209e79b0 x28: 0000000000000037 > > [ 30.995388] x27: 00000000000001c7 x26: 0000000020120121 > > [ 30.995389] x25: 00000000000000d9 x24: 0000000000000000 > > [ 30.995390] x23: ffffffff00f1a700 x22: 0000000000000828 > > [ 30.995391] x21: ffffff80462aa000 x20: ffffff80462aa000 > > [ 30.995392] x19: 0000000000000002 x18: ffffffffffffffff > > [ 30.995393] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000ffff0000 > > [ 30.995394] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd1675ac6d0 > > [ 30.995395] x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003 > > [ 30.995396] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: 0000000000000000 > > [ 30.995397] x9 : 0000000100000001 x8 : 0000000100000000 > > [ 30.995398] x7 : 64696c61765f7369 x6 : ffffffd1681279e8 > > [ 30.995399] x5 : 000000000000001f x4 : 0000000000000001 > > [ 30.995400] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffff89f03dedc8 > > [ 30.995401] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffff80462aa000 > > [ 30.995403] Call trace: > > [ 30.995404] f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c > > [ 30.995405] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0 > > [ 30.995406] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x10/0x20 > > [ 30.995407] f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xe0/0x230 > > [ 30.995409] build_sit_entries+0xa8/0x580 > > [ 30.995411] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x124/0x170 > > [ 30.995412] f2fs_fill_super+0x78c/0xd1c > > [ 30.995415] mount_bdev+0x168/0x1ac > > [ 30.995416] f2fs_mount+0x18/0x24 > > [ 30.995418] legacy_get_tree.llvm.9147845779559715083+0x30/0x5c > > [ 30.995419] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0xe0 > > [ 30.995421] do_new_mount+0x140/0x358 > > [ 30.995422] path_mount+0x1fc/0x4e8 > > [ 30.995423] __arm64_sys_mount+0x150/0x294 > > [ 30.995425] el0_svc_common.llvm.15698454952154965787+0xa8/0x138 > > [ 30.995426] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90 > > [ 30.995429] el0_svc+0x10/0x1c > > [ 30.995430] el0_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe4 > > [ 30.995432] el0_sync+0x1a0/0x1c0 > > [ 30.995433] ---[ end trace 3b83295e0cdac94e ]--- > > [ 31.005011] F2FS-fs (sda13): Mounted with checkpoint version = 2b7e3b29 > > [ 31.005176] init: [libfs_mgr] > > __mount(source=/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/userdata,target=/data,type=f2fs)=0: > > Success > > [ 31.007749] init: Userdata mounted using /vendor/etc/fstab.qcom result : 0 > > > > > > I was bisecting a long boot time (24 additional seconds) issue, which > > is always reproducible, and found commit 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify > > the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") to be causing it. > > > > I'll just revert that patch locally. Seems like Jaegeuk's dev branch > > doesn't have the fix for this specifically yet. > > > > Thanks. > > > >> > >> I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this > >> patch. > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > >>>> --- > >>>> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- > >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > >>>> index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 > >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > >>>> @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>> break; > >>>> case META_SIT: > >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) > >>>> - goto err; > >>>> + goto check_only; > >>>> break; > >>>> case META_SSA: > >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || > >>>> blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) > >>>> - goto err; > >>>> + goto check_only; > >>>> break; > >>>> case META_CP: > >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || > >>>> blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) > >>>> - goto err; > >>>> + goto check_only; > >>>> break; > >>>> case META_POR: > >>>> if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || > >>>> blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) > >>>> - goto err; > >>>> + goto check_only; > >>>> break; > >>>> case DATA_GENERIC: > >>>> case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: > >>>> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>> return true; > >>>> err: > >>>> f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); > >>>> +check_only: > >>>> return false; > >>>> } > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > >> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel I have a question. Is it okay for META_GENERIC?
On 2024/4/28 9:23, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> I have a question. Is it okay for META_GENERIC?
It seems all users of META_GENERIC comes from IO paths:
a) f2fs_merge_page_bio
b) f2fs_submit_page_bio
c) f2fs_submit_page_write - verify_fio_blkaddr
They are all impossible cases? so it's fine to record the error
for this case?
Thanks,
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, break; case META_SIT: if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi))) - goto err; + goto check_only; break; case META_SSA: if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) || blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr)) - goto err; + goto check_only; break; case META_CP: if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr || blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi))) - goto err; + goto check_only; break; case META_POR: if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) - goto err; + goto check_only; break; case DATA_GENERIC: case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE: @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, return true; err: f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR); +check_only: return false; }
f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is not the corruption case. Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)