Message ID | 20240425125855.87025-3-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | virtio_net: enable the irq for ctrlq | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
netdev/apply | fail | Patch does not apply to net-next-1 |
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:58:54 +0800 Heng Qi wrote: > When the dim worker is scheduled, if it no longer needs to issue > commands, dim may not be able to return to the working state later. > > For example, the following single queue scenario: > 1. The dim worker of rxq0 is scheduled, and the dim status is > changed to DIM_APPLY_NEW_PROFILE; > 2. dim is disabled or parameters have not been modified; > 3. virtnet_rx_dim_work exits directly; > > Then, even if net_dim is invoked again, it cannot work because the > state is not restored to DIM_START_MEASURE. > > Fixes: 6208799553a8 ("virtio-net: support rx netdim") > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> This sounds like a legitimate bug fix so it needs to be sent separately to the net tree (subject tagged with [PATCH net]) and then you'll have to wait until the following Thursday for the net tree to get merged into net-next. At which point you can send the improvements. (Without the wait there would be a conflict between the trees). Right now the series does not apply to net-next anyway.
在 2024/4/26 上午10:21, Jakub Kicinski 写道: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:58:54 +0800 Heng Qi wrote: >> When the dim worker is scheduled, if it no longer needs to issue >> commands, dim may not be able to return to the working state later. >> >> For example, the following single queue scenario: >> 1. The dim worker of rxq0 is scheduled, and the dim status is >> changed to DIM_APPLY_NEW_PROFILE; >> 2. dim is disabled or parameters have not been modified; >> 3. virtnet_rx_dim_work exits directly; >> >> Then, even if net_dim is invoked again, it cannot work because the >> state is not restored to DIM_START_MEASURE. >> >> Fixes: 6208799553a8 ("virtio-net: support rx netdim") >> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> > This sounds like a legitimate bug fix so it needs to be sent separately > to the net tree (subject tagged with [PATCH net]) and then you'll have > to wait until the following Thursday for the net tree to get merged > into net-next. At which point you can send the improvements. > (Without the wait there would be a conflict between the trees). Yes, you are right, since this set is on top of the one DanJ is working on (which I mentioned in the commit log and patchwork will warn about), I merged the fix patch into this series. I'll wait for his set to be merged and push it again. Thanks a lot! > > Right now the series does not apply to net-next anyway.
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 79a1b30c173c..8f05bcf1d37d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -3650,9 +3650,9 @@ static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work) if (err) pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n", dev->name, qnum); - dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE; } out: + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE; mutex_unlock(&rq->dim_lock); }
When the dim worker is scheduled, if it no longer needs to issue commands, dim may not be able to return to the working state later. For example, the following single queue scenario: 1. The dim worker of rxq0 is scheduled, and the dim status is changed to DIM_APPLY_NEW_PROFILE; 2. dim is disabled or parameters have not been modified; 3. virtnet_rx_dim_work exits directly; Then, even if net_dim is invoked again, it cannot work because the state is not restored to DIM_START_MEASURE. Fixes: 6208799553a8 ("virtio-net: support rx netdim") Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)