Message ID | 23540303-5816-45d5-a1af-5f09d645a73b@freebox.fr (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 6d67d18014a8130defbca1972d7f0e0a8f8f259e |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | Work around missing MSA_READY indicator for msm8998 devices | expand |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator > to complete initialization. If the indicator is not > received, then the device remains unusable. > > Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue. > Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and > proceed immediately when QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE. > > fw_version 0x100204b2 > fw_build_timestamp 2019-09-04 03:01 > fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HL.1.0-01202-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1.221523.2 > > Jeff Johnson wrote: > > The feedback I received was "it might be ok to change all ath10k qmi > to skip waiting for msa_ready", and it was pointed out that ath11k > (and ath12k) do not wait for it. > > However with so many deployed devices, "might be ok" isn't a strong > argument for changing the default behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Hugues Husson <phhusson@freebox.fr> > Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@freebox.fr> As with patch 1, please address the s-o-b and accept my: Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> Regards, Bjorn > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c | 11 +++++++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c > index 38e939f572a9e..f1f33af0170a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c > @@ -1040,6 +1040,10 @@ static void ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work(struct work_struct *work) > switch (event->type) { > case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE: > ath10k_qmi_event_server_arrive(qmi); > + if (qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator) { > + ath10k_info(ar, "qmi not waiting for msa_ready indicator"); > + ath10k_qmi_event_msa_ready(qmi); > + } > break; > case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_SERVER_EXIT: > ath10k_qmi_event_server_exit(qmi); > @@ -1048,6 +1052,10 @@ static void ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work(struct work_struct *work) > ath10k_qmi_event_fw_ready_ind(qmi); > break; > case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_MSA_READY_IND: > + if (qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator) { > + ath10k_warn(ar, "qmi unexpected msa_ready indicator"); > + break; > + } > ath10k_qmi_event_msa_ready(qmi); > break; > default: > @@ -1077,6 +1085,9 @@ int ath10k_qmi_init(struct ath10k *ar, u32 msa_size) > if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "qcom,msa-fixed-perm")) > qmi->msa_fixed_perm = true; > > + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator")) > + qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator = true; > + > ret = qmi_handle_init(&qmi->qmi_hdl, > WLFW_BDF_DOWNLOAD_REQ_MSG_V01_MAX_MSG_LEN, > &ath10k_qmi_ops, qmi_msg_handler); > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h > index 89464239fe96a..0816eb4e4a18a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct ath10k_qmi { > char fw_build_timestamp[MAX_TIMESTAMP_LEN + 1]; > struct ath10k_qmi_cal_data cal_data[MAX_NUM_CAL_V01]; > bool msa_fixed_perm; > + bool no_msa_ready_indicator; > enum ath10k_qmi_state state; > }; > > -- > 2.34.1 > >
On 30/04/2024 04:24, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >> The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator >> to complete initialization. If the indicator is not >> received, then the device remains unusable. >> >> Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue. >> Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and >> proceed immediately when QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE. >> >> fw_version 0x100204b2 >> fw_build_timestamp 2019-09-04 03:01 >> fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HL.1.0-01202-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1.221523.2 >> >> Jeff Johnson wrote: >> >> The feedback I received was "it might be ok to change all ath10k qmi >> to skip waiting for msa_ready", and it was pointed out that ath11k >> (and ath12k) do not wait for it. >> >> However with so many deployed devices, "might be ok" isn't a strong >> argument for changing the default behavior. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Hugues Husson <phhusson@freebox.fr> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@freebox.fr> > > As with patch 1, please address the s-o-b and accept my: > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> As with patch 1, I typed this patch all by myself with my grubby little paws. You can drop PH's S-o-b. Regards
On 4/29/2024 7:06 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator > to complete initialization. If the indicator is not > received, then the device remains unusable. > > Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue. > Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and > proceed immediately when QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE. > > fw_version 0x100204b2 > fw_build_timestamp 2019-09-04 03:01 > fw_build_id QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HL.1.0-01202-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1.221523.2 > > Jeff Johnson wrote: > > The feedback I received was "it might be ok to change all ath10k qmi > to skip waiting for msa_ready", and it was pointed out that ath11k > (and ath12k) do not wait for it. > > However with so many deployed devices, "might be ok" isn't a strong > argument for changing the default behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Hugues Husson <phhusson@freebox.fr> > Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@freebox.fr> > --- with SOB cleaned up: Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c index 38e939f572a9e..f1f33af0170a0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c @@ -1040,6 +1040,10 @@ static void ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work(struct work_struct *work) switch (event->type) { case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE: ath10k_qmi_event_server_arrive(qmi); + if (qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator) { + ath10k_info(ar, "qmi not waiting for msa_ready indicator"); + ath10k_qmi_event_msa_ready(qmi); + } break; case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_SERVER_EXIT: ath10k_qmi_event_server_exit(qmi); @@ -1048,6 +1052,10 @@ static void ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work(struct work_struct *work) ath10k_qmi_event_fw_ready_ind(qmi); break; case ATH10K_QMI_EVENT_MSA_READY_IND: + if (qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator) { + ath10k_warn(ar, "qmi unexpected msa_ready indicator"); + break; + } ath10k_qmi_event_msa_ready(qmi); break; default: @@ -1077,6 +1085,9 @@ int ath10k_qmi_init(struct ath10k *ar, u32 msa_size) if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "qcom,msa-fixed-perm")) qmi->msa_fixed_perm = true; + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator")) + qmi->no_msa_ready_indicator = true; + ret = qmi_handle_init(&qmi->qmi_hdl, WLFW_BDF_DOWNLOAD_REQ_MSG_V01_MAX_MSG_LEN, &ath10k_qmi_ops, qmi_msg_handler); diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h index 89464239fe96a..0816eb4e4a18a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct ath10k_qmi { char fw_build_timestamp[MAX_TIMESTAMP_LEN + 1]; struct ath10k_qmi_cal_data cal_data[MAX_NUM_CAL_V01]; bool msa_fixed_perm; + bool no_msa_ready_indicator; enum ath10k_qmi_state state; };