Message ID | 20240508182955.358628-1-david@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb | expand |
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:29:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Rebased on 390x/features. Cleanups around PG_arch_1 and folio handling > in UV and hugetlb code. > > One "easy" fix upfront. Another issue I spotted is documented in [1]. > > Once this hits upstream, we can remove HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_PAGE_ACCESSIBLE > from core-mm and s390x, so only the folio variant will remain. > > Compile tested, but not runtime tested with UV, I'll appreciate some > testing help from people with UV access and experience. > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240404163642.1125529-1-david@redhat.com > > v2 -> v3: > * "s390/uv: split large folios in gmap_make_secure()" > -> Spelling fix > * "s390/hugetlb: convert PG_arch_1 code to work on folio->flags" > -> Extended patch description Added Claudio's Reviewed-by from v2 to the third patch, and fixed a typo in the commit message of patch 9. Applied, thanks!
On 09.05.24 17:04, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:29:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Rebased on 390x/features. Cleanups around PG_arch_1 and folio handling >> in UV and hugetlb code. >> >> One "easy" fix upfront. Another issue I spotted is documented in [1]. >> >> Once this hits upstream, we can remove HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_PAGE_ACCESSIBLE >> from core-mm and s390x, so only the folio variant will remain. >> >> Compile tested, but not runtime tested with UV, I'll appreciate some >> testing help from people with UV access and experience. >> >> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240404163642.1125529-1-david@redhat.com >> >> v2 -> v3: >> * "s390/uv: split large folios in gmap_make_secure()" >> -> Spelling fix >> * "s390/hugetlb: convert PG_arch_1 code to work on folio->flags" >> -> Extended patch description > > Added Claudio's Reviewed-by from v2 to the third patch, and fixed a > typo in the commit message of patch 9. Ah, I missed on RB, thanks!