diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,4/9] bpf: create repeated fields for arrays.

Message ID 20240508063218.2806447-5-thinker.li@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head. | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Kui-Feng Lee May 8, 2024, 6:32 a.m. UTC
The verifier uses field information for certain special types, such as
kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are treated
differently. However, we did not previously support these types in
arrays. This update examines arrays and duplicates field information the
same number of times as the length of the array if the element type is one
of the special types.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman May 9, 2024, 11:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 23:32 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> The verifier uses field information for certain special types, such as
> kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are treated
> differently. However, we did not previously support these types in
> arrays. This update examines arrays and duplicates field information the
> same number of times as the length of the array if the element type is one
> of the special types.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[...]

> @@ -3504,6 +3539,19 @@ static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
>  {
>  	int ret, align, sz, field_type;
>  	struct btf_field_info tmp;
> +	const struct btf_array *array;
> +	u32 i, nelems = 1;
> +
> +	/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the number of
> +	 * elements in the (flattened) array.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); i++) {
> +		array = btf_array(var_type);
> +		nelems *= array->nelems;
> +		var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
> +	}

Nit: still think that error should be reported when i == MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH.

> +	if (nelems == 0)
> +		return 0;
>
>  	field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
>  					field_mask, seen_mask, &align, &sz);

[...]
Kui-Feng Lee May 10, 2024, 12:09 a.m. UTC | #2
On 5/9/24 16:13, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 23:32 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>> The verifier uses field information for certain special types, such as
>> kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are treated
>> differently. However, we did not previously support these types in
>> arrays. This update examines arrays and duplicates field information the
>> same number of times as the length of the array if the element type is one
>> of the special types.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>> ---
> 
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> @@ -3504,6 +3539,19 @@ static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
>>   {
>>   	int ret, align, sz, field_type;
>>   	struct btf_field_info tmp;
>> +	const struct btf_array *array;
>> +	u32 i, nelems = 1;
>> +
>> +	/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the number of
>> +	 * elements in the (flattened) array.
>> +	 */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); i++) {
>> +		array = btf_array(var_type);
>> +		nelems *= array->nelems;
>> +		var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
>> +	}
> 
> Nit: still think that error should be reported when i == MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH.

Sure! I will change it.

> 
>> +	if (nelems == 0)
>> +		return 0;
>>
>>   	field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
>>   					field_mask, seen_mask, &align, &sz);
> 
> [...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 2ce61c3a7e28..633c3e037cef 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3494,6 +3494,41 @@  static int btf_get_field_type(const char *name, u32 field_mask, u32 *seen_mask,
 
 #undef field_mask_test_name
 
+/* Repeat a field for a specified number of times.
+ *
+ * Copy and repeat the first field for repeat_cnt
+ * times. The field is repeated by adding the offset of each field
+ * with
+ *   (i + 1) * elem_size
+ * where i is the repeat index and elem_size is the size of an element.
+ */
+static int btf_repeat_field(struct btf_field_info *info,
+			    u32 repeat_cnt, u32 elem_size)
+{
+	u32 i;
+	u32 cur;
+
+	/* Ensure not repeating fields that should not be repeated. */
+	switch (info[0].type) {
+	case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
+	case BPF_KPTR_REF:
+	case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
+	case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
+	case BPF_RB_ROOT:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	cur = 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < repeat_cnt; i++) {
+		memcpy(&info[cur], &info[0], sizeof(info[0]));
+		info[cur++].off += (i + 1) * elem_size;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 			      const struct btf_type *var,
 			      const struct btf_type *var_type,
@@ -3504,6 +3539,19 @@  static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 {
 	int ret, align, sz, field_type;
 	struct btf_field_info tmp;
+	const struct btf_array *array;
+	u32 i, nelems = 1;
+
+	/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the number of
+	 * elements in the (flattened) array.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); i++) {
+		array = btf_array(var_type);
+		nelems *= array->nelems;
+		var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
+	}
+	if (nelems == 0)
+		return 0;
 
 	field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
 					field_mask, seen_mask, &align, &sz);
@@ -3512,7 +3560,7 @@  static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 	if (field_type < 0)
 		return field_type;
 
-	if (expected_size && expected_size != sz)
+	if (expected_size && expected_size != sz * nelems)
 		return 0;
 	if (off % align)
 		return 0;
@@ -3552,10 +3600,14 @@  static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 
 	if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
 		return 0;
-	if (!info_cnt)
+	if (nelems > info_cnt)
 		return -E2BIG;
-
-	return 1;
+	if (nelems > 1) {
+		ret = btf_repeat_field(info, nelems - 1, sz);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	return nelems;
 }
 
 static int btf_find_struct_field(const struct btf *btf,