| Message ID | 20240509-stromer-config-ctl-v1-1-6034e17b28d5@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Awaiting Upstream, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'config_ctl_hi_val' from Stromer pll configs | expand |
On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: > Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer > and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the > IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> > --- Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from QC please confirm that everything's alright here? Konrad
On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: >> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer >> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the >> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. >> >> No functional changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> >> --- > > Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from > QC please confirm that everything's alright here? I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the change[1] by Gabor. Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from clk_stromer_pll_configure function? Nevertheless, for this patch Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=4f2bc4acbb19 > > Konrad
On 10.05.2024 6:25 PM, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: > > > On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: >>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer >>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the >>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. >>> >>> No functional changes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> >>> --- >> >> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from >> QC please confirm that everything's alright here? > > > I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the change[1] by Gabor. Thanks Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Konrad
2024. 05. 10. 18:25 keltezéssel, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy írta: > > > On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: >>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer >>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the >>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. >>> >>> No functional changes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> >>> --- >> >> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from >> QC please confirm that everything's alright here? > > > I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register > is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the > change[1] by Gabor. Thanks for confirming! > > Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from > clk_stromer_pll_configure function? If we can be sure, that there will be no Stromer PLLs which implements that register we can drop the check. Also, since the SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE flag is not set for any of the Stromer (Plus) Plls supported currently, the related check can be dropped as well. However I would keep that as is for now. I'm planning to remove the clk_stromer_pll_configure() function entirely but that needs a bunch of preparatory patches which I'm working on at the moment. > > Nevertheless, for this patch > > Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> Thank you! Regards, Gabor
On 5/14/2024 12:14 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: > 2024. 05. 10. 18:25 keltezéssel, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy írta: >> >> >> On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: >>>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer >>>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the >>>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. >>>> >>>> No functional changes. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>> >>> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from >>> QC please confirm that everything's alright here? >> >> >> I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register >> is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the >> change[1] by Gabor. > > Thanks for confirming! > >> >> Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from >> clk_stromer_pll_configure function? > > If we can be sure, that there will be no Stromer PLLs which implements that > register we can drop the check. Also, since the SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE flag is not > set for any of the Stromer (Plus) Plls supported currently, the related check > can be dropped as well. > > However I would keep that as is for now. I'm planning to remove the > clk_stromer_pll_configure() function entirely but that needs a bunch of > preparatory patches which I'm working on at the moment. > It was Stephen's suggestion[1] to introduce the clk_stromer_pll_configure() to avoid touching the clk_alpha_pll_configure() which has been used by many PLLs. However if we have a valid points to remove this API, then yes. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/fd150fa2b35e1e07808e3d1e67e1def7.sboyd@kernel.org/ >> >> Nevertheless, for this patch >> >> Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> > > Thank you! > > Regards, > Gabor
On Thu, 09 May 2024 10:08:04 +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: > Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer > and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the > IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. > > No functional changes. > > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'config_ctl_hi_val' from Stromer pll configs commit: 2ba8425678af422da37b6c9b50e9ce66f0f55cae Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c index 5f7f537e4ecb..e8632db2c542 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static struct clk_alpha_pll ipq_pll_stromer_plus = { static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5018_pll_config = { .l = 0x2a, .config_ctl_val = 0x4001075b, - .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x304, .main_output_mask = BIT(0), .aux_output_mask = BIT(1), .early_output_mask = BIT(3), @@ -84,7 +83,6 @@ static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5018_pll_config = { static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5332_pll_config = { .l = 0x2d, .config_ctl_val = 0x4001075b, - .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x304, .main_output_mask = BIT(0), .aux_output_mask = BIT(1), .early_output_mask = BIT(3),
Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> --- Based on 'qcom-clk-for-6.10' --- drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 3c5b3e17b8fd1f1add5a9477306c355fab126977 change-id: 20240509-stromer-config-ctl-8cee8e857e13 Best regards,