Message ID | cover.1715956819.git.geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | *arm64: Add CAN-FD support for R-Car V4M and Gray Hawk Single | expand |
Hi Geert, > The CAN-FD module on R-Car V4M is very similar to the one on R-Car V4H, > but differ in some hardware parameters, as reflected by the Parameter > Status Information part of the Global IP Version Register. However, > none of this parameterization should have any impact on the driver, as > the driver does not access any register that is impacted by the > parameterization (except for the number of channels). Does the BSP work? Happy hacking, Wolfram
Hi Wolfram, On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 5:18 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote: > > The CAN-FD module on R-Car V4M is very similar to the one on R-Car V4H, > > but differ in some hardware parameters, as reflected by the Parameter > > Status Information part of the Global IP Version Register. However, > > none of this parameterization should have any impact on the driver, as > > the driver does not access any register that is impacted by the > > parameterization (except for the number of channels). > > Does the BSP work? I haven't tried the BSP in-se (it does not support Gray Hawk Single), but a forward port of rcar_canfd from the BSP exhibits the same behavior. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Wolfram, On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 5:27 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 5:18 PM Wolfram Sang > <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote: > > > The CAN-FD module on R-Car V4M is very similar to the one on R-Car V4H, > > > but differ in some hardware parameters, as reflected by the Parameter > > > Status Information part of the Global IP Version Register. However, > > > none of this parameterization should have any impact on the driver, as > > > the driver does not access any register that is impacted by the > > > parameterization (except for the number of channels). > > > > Does the BSP work? > > I haven't tried the BSP in-se (it does not support Gray Hawk Single), > but a forward port of rcar_canfd from the BSP exhibits the same behavior. I just booted the BSP's kernel and its Gray Hawk DTS on Gray Hawk Single, and I no longer get an error message when bringing up the CAN devices. However, that does not make CAN work, as v5.10 (and the BSP rcar-canfd driver) lack CAN transceiver support. Backporting that didn't help, but now I have something more to investigate next week ;-) Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
> rcar-canfd driver) lack CAN transceiver support. Backporting that > didn't help, but now I have something more to investigate next week ;-) Yay, at least something!