diff mbox series

[v2,01/12] cachefiles: remove request from xarry during flush requests

Message ID 20240515084601.3240503-2-libaokun@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests | expand

Commit Message

Baokun Li May 15, 2024, 8:45 a.m. UTC
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

Even with CACHEFILES_DEAD set, we can still read the requests, so in the
following concurrency the request may be used after it has been freed:

     mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
 cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
   REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
   wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
            cachefiles_daemon_read
             cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
                                  // close dev fd
                                  cachefiles_flush_reqs
                                   complete(&REQ_A->done)
   kfree(REQ_A)
              xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
              cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
                req->msg.opcode != CACHEFILES_OP_READ
                // req use-after-free !!!
              xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
                                   xa_destroy(&cache->reqs)

Hence remove requests from cache->reqs when flushing them to avoid
accessing freed requests.

Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
---
 fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Gao Xiang May 20, 2024, 2:20 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2024/5/15 16:45, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>


The subject line can be
"cachefiles: remove requests from xarray during flushing requests"

> 
> Even with CACHEFILES_DEAD set, we can still read the requests, so in the
> following concurrency the request may be used after it has been freed:
> 
>       mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
>    cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
>     REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
>     wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>              cachefiles_daemon_read
>               cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
>                                    // close dev fd
>                                    cachefiles_flush_reqs
>                                     complete(&REQ_A->done)
>     kfree(REQ_A)
>                xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
>                cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>                  req->msg.opcode != CACHEFILES_OP_READ
>                  // req use-after-free !!!
>                xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>                                     xa_destroy(&cache->reqs)
> 
> Hence remove requests from cache->reqs when flushing them to avoid
> accessing freed requests.
> 
> Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> ---
>   fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> index 6465e2574230..ccb7b707ea4b 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ static void cachefiles_flush_reqs(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
>   	xa_for_each(xa, index, req) {
>   		req->error = -EIO;
>   		complete(&req->done);
> +		__xa_erase(xa, index);
>   	}
>   	xa_unlock(xa);
>
Baokun Li May 20, 2024, 4:11 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2024/5/20 10:20, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/5/15 16:45, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
>> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>
>
> The subject line can be
> "cachefiles: remove requests from xarray during flushing requests"
Thank you very much for the correction! I will update my patch.
>
>>
>> Even with CACHEFILES_DEAD set, we can still read the requests, so in the
>> following concurrency the request may be used after it has been freed:
>>
>>       mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>   cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
>>    cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
>>     REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
>>     wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>>              cachefiles_daemon_read
>>               cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
>>                                    // close dev fd
>>                                    cachefiles_flush_reqs
>> complete(&REQ_A->done)
>>     kfree(REQ_A)
>>                xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
>>                cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>>                  req->msg.opcode != CACHEFILES_OP_READ
>>                  // req use-after-free !!!
>>                xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>> xa_destroy(&cache->reqs)
>>
>> Hence remove requests from cache->reqs when flushing them to avoid
>> accessing freed requests.
>>
>> Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking 
>> up cookie")
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
Thanks a lot for the review!

Cheers,
Baokun
>
>> ---
>>   fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
>> index 6465e2574230..ccb7b707ea4b 100644
>> --- a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
>> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ static void cachefiles_flush_reqs(struct 
>> cachefiles_cache *cache)
>>       xa_for_each(xa, index, req) {
>>           req->error = -EIO;
>>           complete(&req->done);
>> +        __xa_erase(xa, index);
>>       }
>>       xa_unlock(xa);
Jingbo Xu May 20, 2024, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #3
On 5/15/24 4:45 PM, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> 
> Even with CACHEFILES_DEAD set, we can still read the requests, so in the
> following concurrency the request may be used after it has been freed:
> 
>      mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>  cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
>   cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
>    REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
>    wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>             cachefiles_daemon_read
>              cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
>                                   // close dev fd
>                                   cachefiles_flush_reqs
>                                    complete(&REQ_A->done)
>    kfree(REQ_A)
>               xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
>               cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>                 req->msg.opcode != CACHEFILES_OP_READ
>                 // req use-after-free !!!
>               xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>                                    xa_destroy(&cache->reqs)
> 
> Hence remove requests from cache->reqs when flushing them to avoid
> accessing freed requests.
> 
> Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>

> ---
>  fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> index 6465e2574230..ccb7b707ea4b 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ static void cachefiles_flush_reqs(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
>  	xa_for_each(xa, index, req) {
>  		req->error = -EIO;
>  		complete(&req->done);
> +		__xa_erase(xa, index);
>  	}
>  	xa_unlock(xa);
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
index 6465e2574230..ccb7b707ea4b 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@  static void cachefiles_flush_reqs(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
 	xa_for_each(xa, index, req) {
 		req->error = -EIO;
 		complete(&req->done);
+		__xa_erase(xa, index);
 	}
 	xa_unlock(xa);