Message ID | 20240515082041.556571-3-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | VFIO: misc cleanups part2 | expand |
On 5/15/24 10:20, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > This is to follow the coding standand in qapi/error.h to return bool > for bool-valued functions. > > Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> One comment below, > --- > hw/vfio/pci.h | 2 +- > hw/vfio/display.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > hw/vfio/pci.c | 3 +-- > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.h b/hw/vfio/pci.h > index 92cd62d115..a5ac9efd4b 100644 > --- a/hw/vfio/pci.h > +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.h > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int vfio_pci_igd_opregion_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, > Error **errp); > > void vfio_display_reset(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); > -int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); > +bool vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); > void vfio_display_finalize(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); > > extern const VMStateDescription vfio_display_vmstate; > diff --git a/hw/vfio/display.c b/hw/vfio/display.c > index 57c5ae0b2a..b562f4be74 100644 > --- a/hw/vfio/display.c > +++ b/hw/vfio/display.c > @@ -346,11 +346,11 @@ static const GraphicHwOps vfio_display_dmabuf_ops = { > .ui_info = vfio_display_edid_ui_info, > }; > > -static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > +static bool vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > { > if (!display_opengl) { > error_setg(errp, "vfio-display-dmabuf: opengl not available"); > - return -1; > + return false; > } > > vdev->dpy = g_new0(VFIODisplay, 1); > @@ -360,11 +360,11 @@ static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { > vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); > if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { > - return -EINVAL; > + return false; > } > } > vfio_display_edid_init(vdev); vfio_display_edid_init() can fail for many reasons and does it silently. It would be good to report the error in a future patch. Thanks, C. > - return 0; > + return true; > } > > static void vfio_display_dmabuf_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static const GraphicHwOps vfio_display_region_ops = { > .gfx_update = vfio_display_region_update, > }; > > -static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > +static bool vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > { > vdev->dpy = g_new0(VFIODisplay, 1); > vdev->dpy->con = graphic_console_init(DEVICE(vdev), 0, > @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { > vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); > if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { > - return -EINVAL; > + return false; > } > } > - return 0; > + return true; > } > > static void vfio_display_region_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void vfio_display_region_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) > > /* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */ > > -int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > +bool vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > { > struct vfio_device_gfx_plane_info probe; > int ret; > @@ -531,11 +531,11 @@ int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) > > if (vdev->display == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) { > /* not an error in automatic mode */ > - return 0; > + return true; > } > > error_setg(errp, "vfio: device doesn't support any (known) display method"); > - return -1; > + return false; > } > > void vfio_display_finalize(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev) > diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c > index c1adef5cf8..a447013a1d 100644 > --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c > +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c > @@ -3200,8 +3200,7 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp) > } > > if (vdev->display != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) { > - ret = vfio_display_probe(vdev, errp); > - if (ret) { > + if (!vfio_display_probe(vdev, errp)) { > goto out_deregister; > } > }
>-----Original Message----- >From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] vfio/display: Make vfio_display_*() return bool > >On 5/15/24 10:20, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: >> This is to follow the coding standand in qapi/error.h to return bool >> for bool-valued functions. >> >> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> > > >Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> > >One comment below, > >> --- >> hw/vfio/pci.h | 2 +- >> hw/vfio/display.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- >> hw/vfio/pci.c | 3 +-- >> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.h b/hw/vfio/pci.h >> index 92cd62d115..a5ac9efd4b 100644 >> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.h >> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.h >> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int vfio_pci_igd_opregion_init(VFIOPCIDevice >*vdev, >> Error **errp); >> >> void vfio_display_reset(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); >> -int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); >> +bool vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); >> void vfio_display_finalize(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); >> >> extern const VMStateDescription vfio_display_vmstate; >> diff --git a/hw/vfio/display.c b/hw/vfio/display.c >> index 57c5ae0b2a..b562f4be74 100644 >> --- a/hw/vfio/display.c >> +++ b/hw/vfio/display.c >> @@ -346,11 +346,11 @@ static const GraphicHwOps >vfio_display_dmabuf_ops = { >> .ui_info = vfio_display_edid_ui_info, >> }; >> >> -static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) >> +static bool vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) >> { >> if (!display_opengl) { >> error_setg(errp, "vfio-display-dmabuf: opengl not available"); >> - return -1; >> + return false; >> } >> >> vdev->dpy = g_new0(VFIODisplay, 1); >> @@ -360,11 +360,11 @@ static int >vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) >> if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { >> vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); >> if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { >> - return -EINVAL; >> + return false; >> } >> } >> vfio_display_edid_init(vdev); > >vfio_display_edid_init() can fail for many reasons and does it silently. >It would be good to report the error in a future patch. Yes, that deserve a fix. Will address it with a future patch. Thanks Zhenzhong
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.h b/hw/vfio/pci.h index 92cd62d115..a5ac9efd4b 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/pci.h +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.h @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int vfio_pci_igd_opregion_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); void vfio_display_reset(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); -int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); +bool vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp); void vfio_display_finalize(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev); extern const VMStateDescription vfio_display_vmstate; diff --git a/hw/vfio/display.c b/hw/vfio/display.c index 57c5ae0b2a..b562f4be74 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/display.c +++ b/hw/vfio/display.c @@ -346,11 +346,11 @@ static const GraphicHwOps vfio_display_dmabuf_ops = { .ui_info = vfio_display_edid_ui_info, }; -static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) +static bool vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) { if (!display_opengl) { error_setg(errp, "vfio-display-dmabuf: opengl not available"); - return -1; + return false; } vdev->dpy = g_new0(VFIODisplay, 1); @@ -360,11 +360,11 @@ static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { - return -EINVAL; + return false; } } vfio_display_edid_init(vdev); - return 0; + return true; } static void vfio_display_dmabuf_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static const GraphicHwOps vfio_display_region_ops = { .gfx_update = vfio_display_region_update, }; -static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) +static bool vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) { vdev->dpy = g_new0(VFIODisplay, 1); vdev->dpy->con = graphic_console_init(DEVICE(vdev), 0, @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { - return -EINVAL; + return false; } } - return 0; + return true; } static void vfio_display_region_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void vfio_display_region_exit(VFIODisplay *dpy) /* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */ -int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) +bool vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) { struct vfio_device_gfx_plane_info probe; int ret; @@ -531,11 +531,11 @@ int vfio_display_probe(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) if (vdev->display == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) { /* not an error in automatic mode */ - return 0; + return true; } error_setg(errp, "vfio: device doesn't support any (known) display method"); - return -1; + return false; } void vfio_display_finalize(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev) diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c index c1adef5cf8..a447013a1d 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c @@ -3200,8 +3200,7 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp) } if (vdev->display != ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) { - ret = vfio_display_probe(vdev, errp); - if (ret) { + if (!vfio_display_probe(vdev, errp)) { goto out_deregister; } }
This is to follow the coding standand in qapi/error.h to return bool for bool-valued functions. Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> --- hw/vfio/pci.h | 2 +- hw/vfio/display.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- hw/vfio/pci.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)