diff mbox series

[v2,1/4] x86/shadow: Rework trace_shadow_gen() into sh_trace_va()

Message ID 20240522131703.30839-2-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series x86/shadow: Trace fixes and cleanup | expand

Commit Message

Andrew Cooper May 22, 2024, 1:17 p.m. UTC
The ((GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) << 8) expression in the event field is common
to all shadow trace events, so introduce sh_trace() as a very thin wrapper
around trace().

Then, rename trace_shadow_gen() to sh_trace_va() to better describe what it is
doing, and to be more consistent with later cleanup.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>

v2:
 * New
---
 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Beulich May 22, 2024, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On 22.05.2024 15:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> @@ -1974,13 +1974,17 @@ typedef u32 guest_va_t;
>  typedef u32 guest_pa_t;
>  #endif
>  
> -static inline void trace_shadow_gen(u32 event, guest_va_t va)
> +/* Shadow trace event with GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS folded into the event field. */
> +static void sh_trace(uint32_t event, unsigned int extra, const void *extra_data)
> +{
> +    trace(event | ((GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) << 8), extra, extra_data);
> +}
> +
> +/* Shadow trace event with the guest's linear address. */
> +static void sh_trace_va(uint32_t event, guest_va_t va)
>  {
>      if ( tb_init_done )
> -    {
> -        event |= (GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS-2)<<8;
> -        trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
> -    }
> +        sh_trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
>  }

If any tb_init_done check, then perhaps rather in sh_trace()? With that
(and provided you agree)
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Jan
Andrew Cooper May 22, 2024, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On 22/05/2024 2:40 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.05.2024 15:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
>> @@ -1974,13 +1974,17 @@ typedef u32 guest_va_t;
>>  typedef u32 guest_pa_t;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -static inline void trace_shadow_gen(u32 event, guest_va_t va)
>> +/* Shadow trace event with GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS folded into the event field. */
>> +static void sh_trace(uint32_t event, unsigned int extra, const void *extra_data)
>> +{
>> +    trace(event | ((GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) << 8), extra, extra_data);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Shadow trace event with the guest's linear address. */
>> +static void sh_trace_va(uint32_t event, guest_va_t va)
>>  {
>>      if ( tb_init_done )
>> -    {
>> -        event |= (GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS-2)<<8;
>> -        trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
>> -    }
>> +        sh_trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
>>  }
> If any tb_init_done check, then perhaps rather in sh_trace()? With that
> (and provided you agree)
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Sadly not.  That leads to double reads of tb_init_done when tracing is
compiled in.

When GCC can't fully inline the structure initialisation, it can't prove
that a function call modified tb_init_done.  This is why I arranged all
the trace cleanup in this way.

~Andrew
Jan Beulich May 22, 2024, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #3
On 22.05.2024 15:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/2024 2:40 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.05.2024 15:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
>>> @@ -1974,13 +1974,17 @@ typedef u32 guest_va_t;
>>>  typedef u32 guest_pa_t;
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>> -static inline void trace_shadow_gen(u32 event, guest_va_t va)
>>> +/* Shadow trace event with GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS folded into the event field. */
>>> +static void sh_trace(uint32_t event, unsigned int extra, const void *extra_data)
>>> +{
>>> +    trace(event | ((GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) << 8), extra, extra_data);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Shadow trace event with the guest's linear address. */
>>> +static void sh_trace_va(uint32_t event, guest_va_t va)
>>>  {
>>>      if ( tb_init_done )
>>> -    {
>>> -        event |= (GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS-2)<<8;
>>> -        trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
>>> -    }
>>> +        sh_trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
>>>  }
>> If any tb_init_done check, then perhaps rather in sh_trace()? With that
>> (and provided you agree)
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> Sadly not.  That leads to double reads of tb_init_done when tracing is
> compiled in.

Not here, but I can see how that could happen in principle, when ...

> When GCC can't fully inline the structure initialisation, it can't prove
> that a function call modified tb_init_done.  This is why I arranged all
> the trace cleanup in this way.

... inlining indeed doesn't happen. Patch 2 fits the one here in this regard
(no function calls); I have yet to look at patch 3, though.

But anyway, the present placement, while likely a little redundant, is not
the end of the world, so my R-b holds either way.

Jan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
index bcd02b2d0037..1775952d7e18 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
@@ -1974,13 +1974,17 @@  typedef u32 guest_va_t;
 typedef u32 guest_pa_t;
 #endif
 
-static inline void trace_shadow_gen(u32 event, guest_va_t va)
+/* Shadow trace event with GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS folded into the event field. */
+static void sh_trace(uint32_t event, unsigned int extra, const void *extra_data)
+{
+    trace(event | ((GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) << 8), extra, extra_data);
+}
+
+/* Shadow trace event with the guest's linear address. */
+static void sh_trace_va(uint32_t event, guest_va_t va)
 {
     if ( tb_init_done )
-    {
-        event |= (GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS-2)<<8;
-        trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
-    }
+        sh_trace(event, sizeof(va), &va);
 }
 
 static inline void trace_shadow_fixup(guest_l1e_t gl1e,
@@ -2239,7 +2243,7 @@  static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
                 sh_reset_early_unshadow(v);
                 perfc_incr(shadow_fault_fast_gnp);
                 SHADOW_PRINTK("fast path not-present\n");
-                trace_shadow_gen(TRC_SHADOW_FAST_PROPAGATE, va);
+                sh_trace_va(TRC_SHADOW_FAST_PROPAGATE, va);
                 return 0;
             }
 #ifdef CONFIG_HVM
@@ -2250,7 +2254,7 @@  static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
             perfc_incr(shadow_fault_fast_mmio);
             SHADOW_PRINTK("fast path mmio %#"PRIpaddr"\n", gpa);
             sh_reset_early_unshadow(v);
-            trace_shadow_gen(TRC_SHADOW_FAST_MMIO, va);
+            sh_trace_va(TRC_SHADOW_FAST_MMIO, va);
             return handle_mmio_with_translation(va, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, access)
                    ? EXCRET_fault_fixed : 0;
 #else
@@ -2265,7 +2269,7 @@  static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
              * Retry and let the hardware give us the right fault next time. */
             perfc_incr(shadow_fault_fast_fail);
             SHADOW_PRINTK("fast path false alarm!\n");
-            trace_shadow_gen(TRC_SHADOW_FALSE_FAST_PATH, va);
+            sh_trace_va(TRC_SHADOW_FALSE_FAST_PATH, va);
             return EXCRET_fault_fixed;
         }
     }
@@ -2481,7 +2485,7 @@  static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
 #endif
         paging_unlock(d);
         put_gfn(d, gfn_x(gfn));
-        trace_shadow_gen(TRC_SHADOW_DOMF_DYING, va);
+        sh_trace_va(TRC_SHADOW_DOMF_DYING, va);
         return 0;
     }
 
@@ -2569,7 +2573,7 @@  static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
         put_gfn(d, gfn_x(gfn));
 
         perfc_incr(shadow_fault_mmio);
-        trace_shadow_gen(TRC_SHADOW_MMIO, va);
+        sh_trace_va(TRC_SHADOW_MMIO, va);
 
         return handle_mmio_with_translation(va, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, access)
                ? EXCRET_fault_fixed : 0;