Message ID | 20240524170906.54680-76-johannes@sipsolutions.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | backport updates from Intel | expand |
On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 19:07 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > So ... I talked to Brian today, and realized that we've been > sort of maintaining backports to some extent, but not really. > > This is what we have in our tree that's not upstream, and > rebased onto upstream (commit c96f36d5214). > > With the copy-list restricted to the iwlwifi driver and hwsim > it even works, Well, I should've said, with 6.9 kernel. johannes
On 5/24/24 19:07, Johannes Berg wrote: > So ... I talked to Brian today, and realized that we've been > sort of maintaining backports to some extent, but not really. > > This is what we have in our tree that's not upstream, and > rebased onto upstream (commit c96f36d5214). > > With the copy-list restricted to the iwlwifi driver and hwsim > it even works, but the copy-list as-is doesn't even work, it > even contains some files that no longer exist. > > But it's a start, and it's a lot of stuff that's not upstream > yet. > > johannes > > Hi Johannes, Thank you for the patches. OpenWrt still uses backports, I would like to get upstream up to date again. I took some older patch series from you and some patches from Felix. https://github.com/hauke/backports/commits/testing-6.1-rebase/ This is compiling fine using kerne 6.1 as a base. I really should clean up the last patches and then push them to master. I haven't done much runtime testing, but it looks similar to the backports we use in OpenWrt against kernel 5.15. Hauke
On 5/24/24 19:07, Johannes Berg wrote: > So ... I talked to Brian today, and realized that we've been > sort of maintaining backports to some extent, but not really. > > This is what we have in our tree that's not upstream, and > rebased onto upstream (commit c96f36d5214). > > With the copy-list restricted to the iwlwifi driver and hwsim > it even works, but the copy-list as-is doesn't even work, it > even contains some files that no longer exist. > > But it's a start, and it's a lot of stuff that's not upstream > yet. > > johannes > > Hi Johannes, I pushed the changes supporting kernel 6.1 to master. Could you please rebase the patches on top of current master. Hauke