diff mbox series

[RFC,v3,05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries

Message ID aa54834e9ee5e40179def32ff5834a8a2a02c413.1716714720.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) | expand

Commit Message

Christophe Leroy May 26, 2024, 9:22 a.m. UTC
Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
to the following error:

  CC      arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
  506 | }
      | ^
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
  394 |         pud_t pud, *pudp;
      |               ^~~
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here

This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.

So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
pointers and not on on-stack copies.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
v3: Removed p4dp and pudp locals for PPC32 and add a comment.
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Comments

Oscar Salvador May 27, 2024, 4:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
> to the following error:
> 
>   CC      arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
>   506 | }
>       | ^
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>   394 |         pud_t pud, *pudp;
>       |               ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
> 
> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
> 
> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning
always false, but no strong feelings:

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Christophe Leroy May 27, 2024, 5:16 a.m. UTC | #2
Le 27/05/2024 à 06:55, Oscar Salvador a écrit :
> On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
>> to the following error:
>>
>>    CC      arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
>>    506 | }
>>        | ^
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>>    394 |         pud_t pud, *pudp;
>>        |               ^~~
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>>
>> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
>>
>> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
>> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> 
> Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning
> always false, but no strong feelings:

I prefer to keep it separate, the patch introducing pmd_leaf() is 
already big enough.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> 
>
Oscar Salvador May 27, 2024, 11:25 a.m. UTC | #3
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
> to the following error:
> 
>   CC      arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
>   506 | }
>       | ^
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>   394 |         pud_t pud, *pudp;
>       |               ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
> 
> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
> 
> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
index 9e7ba9c3851f..10adef5967a3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -382,8 +382,10 @@  pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
 			bool *is_thp, unsigned *hpage_shift)
 {
 	pgd_t *pgdp;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 	p4d_t p4d, *p4dp;
 	pud_t pud, *pudp;
+#endif
 	pmd_t pmd, *pmdp;
 	pte_t *ret_pte;
 	hugepd_t *hpdp = NULL;
@@ -401,8 +403,12 @@  pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
 	 * page fault or a page unmap. The return pte_t * is still not
 	 * stable. So should be checked there for above conditions.
 	 * Top level is an exception because it is folded into p4d.
+	 *
+	 * On PPC32, P4D/PUD/PMD are folded into PGD so go straight to
+	 * PMD level.
 	 */
 	pgdp = pgdir + pgd_index(ea);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 	p4dp = p4d_offset(pgdp, ea);
 	p4d  = READ_ONCE(*p4dp);
 	pdshift = P4D_SHIFT;
@@ -444,6 +450,9 @@  pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
 
 	pdshift = PMD_SHIFT;
 	pmdp = pmd_offset(&pud, ea);
+#else
+	pmdp = pmd_offset(pud_offset(p4d_offset(pgdp, ea), ea), ea);
+#endif
 	pmd  = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
 
 	/*