| Message ID | 20240527150117.608792-1-inv.git-commit@tdk.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: stabilized timestamping in interrupt | expand |
On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:01:17 +0000 inv.git-commit@tdk.com wrote: > From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com> > > Use IRQ ONESHOT flag to ensure the timestamp is not updated in the > hard handler during the thread handler. And use a fixed value of 1 > sample that correspond to this first timestamp. > > This way we can ensure the timestamp is always corresponding to the > value used by the timestamping mechanism. Otherwise, it is possible > that between FIFO count read and FIFO processing the timestamp is > overwritten in the hard handler. > > Fixes: 111e1abd0045 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: use the common inv_sensors timestamp module") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com> Applied > --- > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c > index 0dc0f22a5582..3d3b27f28c9d 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c > @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p) > goto end_session; > /* Each FIFO data contains all sensors, so same number for FIFO and sensor data */ > fifo_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / INV_MPU6050_DIVIDER_TO_FIFO_RATE(st->chip_config.divider); > - inv_sensors_timestamp_interrupt(&st->timestamp, nb, pf->timestamp); > - inv_sensors_timestamp_apply_odr(&st->timestamp, fifo_period, nb, 0); > + inv_sensors_timestamp_interrupt(&st->timestamp, 1, pf->timestamp); > + inv_sensors_timestamp_apply_odr(&st->timestamp, fifo_period, 1, 0); > > /* clear internal data buffer for avoiding kernel data leak */ > memset(data, 0, sizeof(data)); > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > index 1b603567ccc8..84273660ca2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ int inv_mpu6050_probe_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int irq_type) > if (!st->trig) > return -ENOMEM; > > + irq_type |= IRQF_ONESHOT; > ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&indio_dev->dev, st->irq, > &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_timestamp, > &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_handle,
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c index 0dc0f22a5582..3d3b27f28c9d 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p) goto end_session; /* Each FIFO data contains all sensors, so same number for FIFO and sensor data */ fifo_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / INV_MPU6050_DIVIDER_TO_FIFO_RATE(st->chip_config.divider); - inv_sensors_timestamp_interrupt(&st->timestamp, nb, pf->timestamp); - inv_sensors_timestamp_apply_odr(&st->timestamp, fifo_period, nb, 0); + inv_sensors_timestamp_interrupt(&st->timestamp, 1, pf->timestamp); + inv_sensors_timestamp_apply_odr(&st->timestamp, fifo_period, 1, 0); /* clear internal data buffer for avoiding kernel data leak */ memset(data, 0, sizeof(data)); diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c index 1b603567ccc8..84273660ca2e 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ int inv_mpu6050_probe_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int irq_type) if (!st->trig) return -ENOMEM; + irq_type |= IRQF_ONESHOT; ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&indio_dev->dev, st->irq, &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_timestamp, &inv_mpu6050_interrupt_handle,