Message ID | 20240603183121.2305013-1-amorenoz@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next,1/2] selftests: openvswitch: fix action formatting | expand |
Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> writes: > In the action formatting function ("dpstr"), the iteration is made over > the nla_map, so if there are more than one attribute from the same type > we only print the first one. > > Fix this by iterating over the actual attributes. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> > --- > .../selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py | 48 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > index 1dd057afd3fb..b76907ac0092 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > @@ -437,40 +437,46 @@ class ovsactions(nla): > def dpstr(self, more=False): > print_str = "" > > - for field in self.nla_map: > - if field[1] == "none" or self.get_attr(field[0]) is None: > + for attr_name, value in self["attrs"]: > + attr_desc = next(filter(lambda x: x[0] == attr_name, self.nla_map), > + None) > + if not attr_desc: > + raise ValueError("Unknown attribute: %s" % attr) > + > + attr_type = attr_desc[1] > + > + if attr_type == "none": I agree, this is an issue. BUT I think it might be better to just filter by field type up front. See: https://github.com/apconole/linux-next-work/commit/7262107de7170d44b6dbf6c5ea6f7e6c0bb71d36#diff-3e72e7405c6bb4e9842bed5f63883ca930387086bb40d4034e92ed83a5decb4bR441 That version I think ends up being much easier to follow. If you want to take it for your series, feel free. If you disagree, maybe there's something I'm not considering about it. NOTE that version is just a bunch of independent changes that are squashed together. I have a cleaner version. I can also bundle up the series I have so far and submit, but I didn't want to do that until I got all the pmtu.sh support working. Maybe it makes sense to send it now though. Simon, Jakub - wdyt? > continue > if print_str != "": > print_str += "," > > - if field[1] == "uint32": > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": > - print_str += "%d" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": > - print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": > - print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": > - print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > - elif field[1] == "flag": > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": > + if attr_type == "uint32": > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": > + print_str += "%d" % int(value) > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": > + print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(value) > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": > + print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(value) > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": > + print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(value) > + elif attr_type == "flag": > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": > print_str += "ct_clear" > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": > print_str += "pop_vlan" > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": > print_str += "pop_eth" > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": > print_str += "pop_nsh" > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": > print_str += "pop_mpls" > else: > - datum = self.get_attr(field[0]) > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": > print_str += "clone(" > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) > print_str += ")" > else: > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) > > return print_str
On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:00:03 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: > I agree, this is an issue. BUT I think it might be better to just > filter by field type up front. See: > > https://github.com/apconole/linux-next-work/commit/7262107de7170d44b6dbf6c5ea6f7e6c0bb71d36#diff-3e72e7405c6bb4e9842bed5f63883ca930387086bb40d4034e92ed83a5decb4bR441 > > That version I think ends up being much easier to follow. If you want > to take it for your series, feel free. If you disagree, maybe there's > something I'm not considering about it. > > NOTE that version is just a bunch of independent changes that are > squashed together. I have a cleaner version. > > I can also bundle up the series I have so far and submit, but I didn't > want to do that until I got all the pmtu.sh support working. Maybe it > makes sense to send it now though. Simon, Jakub - wdyt? I'd say - hold onto the changes until pmtu.sh works, unless there's *any* reason for a particular patch to go in early, eg: - patch fixes existing bug - someone else needs a patch - ... - a patch which falls under some of the criteria above depends on the patch
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:00:03PM GMT, Aaron Conole wrote: > Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> writes: > > > In the action formatting function ("dpstr"), the iteration is made over > > the nla_map, so if there are more than one attribute from the same type > > we only print the first one. > > > > Fix this by iterating over the actual attributes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> > > --- > > .../selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py | 48 +++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > > index 1dd057afd3fb..b76907ac0092 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py > > @@ -437,40 +437,46 @@ class ovsactions(nla): > > def dpstr(self, more=False): > > print_str = "" > > > > - for field in self.nla_map: > > - if field[1] == "none" or self.get_attr(field[0]) is None: > > + for attr_name, value in self["attrs"]: > > + attr_desc = next(filter(lambda x: x[0] == attr_name, self.nla_map), > > + None) > > + if not attr_desc: > > + raise ValueError("Unknown attribute: %s" % attr) > > + > > + attr_type = attr_desc[1] > > + > > + if attr_type == "none": > > I agree, this is an issue. BUT I think it might be better to just > filter by field type up front. See: > > https://github.com/apconole/linux-next-work/commit/7262107de7170d44b6dbf6c5ea6f7e6c0bb71d36#diff-3e72e7405c6bb4e9842bed5f63883ca930387086bb40d4034e92ed83a5decb4bR441 > > That version I think ends up being much easier to follow. If you want > to take it for your series, feel free. If you disagree, maybe there's > something I'm not considering about it. > I agree. It's better to check field attribute names first. I found this during manual testing of the "emit_sample" series but I ended up not needing it for the automated one, so I'm OK waiting for your cleanup series. In fact, I also have some patches that try some rework of this part. In particular, I tried to unify all attributes under a common base class that would handle printing and parsing. That way, most cases would fall into "print_str += datum.dpstr(more)" and the "if/elif" block would shrink significantly. > NOTE that version is just a bunch of independent changes that are > squashed together. I have a cleaner version. > > I can also bundle up the series I have so far and submit, but I didn't > want to do that until I got all the pmtu.sh support working. Maybe it > makes sense to send it now though. Simon, Jakub - wdyt? > > > continue > > if print_str != "": > > print_str += "," > > > > - if field[1] == "uint32": > > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": > > - print_str += "%d" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": > > - print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": > > - print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": > > - print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) > > - elif field[1] == "flag": > > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": > > + if attr_type == "uint32": > > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": > > + print_str += "%d" % int(value) > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": > > + print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(value) > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": > > + print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(value) > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": > > + print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(value) > > + elif attr_type == "flag": > > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": > > print_str += "ct_clear" > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": > > print_str += "pop_vlan" > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": > > print_str += "pop_eth" > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": > > print_str += "pop_nsh" > > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": > > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": > > print_str += "pop_mpls" > > else: > > - datum = self.get_attr(field[0]) > > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": > > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": > > print_str += "clone(" > > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) > > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) > > print_str += ")" > > else: > > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) > > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) > > > > return print_str >
Adrián Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:00:03PM GMT, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > In the action formatting function ("dpstr"), the iteration is made over >> > the nla_map, so if there are more than one attribute from the same type >> > we only print the first one. >> > >> > Fix this by iterating over the actual attributes. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > .../selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py | 48 +++++++++++-------- >> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py >> > index 1dd057afd3fb..b76907ac0092 100644 >> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py >> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py >> > @@ -437,40 +437,46 @@ class ovsactions(nla): >> > def dpstr(self, more=False): >> > print_str = "" >> > >> > - for field in self.nla_map: >> > - if field[1] == "none" or self.get_attr(field[0]) is None: >> > + for attr_name, value in self["attrs"]: >> > + attr_desc = next(filter(lambda x: x[0] == attr_name, self.nla_map), >> > + None) >> > + if not attr_desc: >> > + raise ValueError("Unknown attribute: %s" % attr) >> > + >> > + attr_type = attr_desc[1] >> > + >> > + if attr_type == "none": >> >> I agree, this is an issue. BUT I think it might be better to just >> filter by field type up front. See: >> >> https://github.com/apconole/linux-next-work/commit/7262107de7170d44b6dbf6c5ea6f7e6c0bb71d36#diff-3e72e7405c6bb4e9842bed5f63883ca930387086bb40d4034e92ed83a5decb4bR441 >> >> That version I think ends up being much easier to follow. If you want >> to take it for your series, feel free. If you disagree, maybe there's >> something I'm not considering about it. >> > > I agree. It's better to check field attribute names first. I found this > during manual testing of the "emit_sample" series but I ended up not > needing it for the automated one, so I'm OK waiting for your cleanup > series. I'll get stuff out this week for it. > In fact, I also have some patches that try some rework of this part. In > particular, I tried to unify all attributes under a common base class > that would handle printing and parsing. That way, most cases would fall > into "print_str += datum.dpstr(more)" and the "if/elif" block would > shrink significantly. That sounds very good. >> NOTE that version is just a bunch of independent changes that are >> squashed together. I have a cleaner version. >> >> I can also bundle up the series I have so far and submit, but I didn't >> want to do that until I got all the pmtu.sh support working. Maybe it >> makes sense to send it now though. Simon, Jakub - wdyt? >> >> > continue >> > if print_str != "": >> > print_str += "," >> > >> > - if field[1] == "uint32": >> > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": >> > - print_str += "%d" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": >> > - print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": >> > - print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": >> > - print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) >> > - elif field[1] == "flag": >> > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": >> > + if attr_type == "uint32": >> > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": >> > + print_str += "%d" % int(value) >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": >> > + print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(value) >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": >> > + print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(value) >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": >> > + print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(value) >> > + elif attr_type == "flag": >> > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": >> > print_str += "ct_clear" >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": >> > print_str += "pop_vlan" >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": >> > print_str += "pop_eth" >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": >> > print_str += "pop_nsh" >> > - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": >> > + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": >> > print_str += "pop_mpls" >> > else: >> > - datum = self.get_attr(field[0]) >> > - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": >> > + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": >> > print_str += "clone(" >> > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) >> > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) >> > print_str += ")" >> > else: >> > - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) >> > + print_str += value.dpstr(more) >> > >> > return print_str >>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py index 1dd057afd3fb..b76907ac0092 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py @@ -437,40 +437,46 @@ class ovsactions(nla): def dpstr(self, more=False): print_str = "" - for field in self.nla_map: - if field[1] == "none" or self.get_attr(field[0]) is None: + for attr_name, value in self["attrs"]: + attr_desc = next(filter(lambda x: x[0] == attr_name, self.nla_map), + None) + if not attr_desc: + raise ValueError("Unknown attribute: %s" % attr) + + attr_type = attr_desc[1] + + if attr_type == "none": continue if print_str != "": print_str += "," - if field[1] == "uint32": - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": - print_str += "%d" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": - print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": - print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": - print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(self.get_attr(field[0])) - elif field[1] == "flag": - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": + if attr_type == "uint32": + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT": + print_str += "%d" % int(value) + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC": + print_str += "recirc(0x%x)" % int(value) + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TRUNC": + print_str += "trunc(%d)" % int(value) + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP": + print_str += "drop(%d)" % int(value) + elif attr_type == "flag": + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CT_CLEAR": print_str += "ct_clear" - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN": print_str += "pop_vlan" - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_ETH": print_str += "pop_eth" - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_NSH": print_str += "pop_nsh" - elif field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": + elif attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS": print_str += "pop_mpls" else: - datum = self.get_attr(field[0]) - if field[0] == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": + if attr_name == "OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE": print_str += "clone(" - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) + print_str += value.dpstr(more) print_str += ")" else: - print_str += datum.dpstr(more) + print_str += value.dpstr(more) return print_str
In the action formatting function ("dpstr"), the iteration is made over the nla_map, so if there are more than one attribute from the same type we only print the first one. Fix this by iterating over the actual attributes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> --- .../selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py | 48 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)