diff mbox series

[v2,2/5] cpufreq: ti: update OPP table for AM62Px SoCs

Message ID 20240612-ti-opp-updates-v2-2-422b6747a254@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Update OPP table and add entries for AM62Ax & AM62Px SoCs | expand

Commit Message

Bryan Brattlof June 12, 2024, 11:17 p.m. UTC
More speed grades for the AM62Px SoC family have been defined which
unfortunately no longer align with the AM62x table. So create a new
table with these new speed grades defined for the AM62Px

Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Dhruva Gole June 13, 2024, 11:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On Jun 12, 2024 at 18:17:35 -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> More speed grades for the AM62Px SoC family have been defined which
> unfortunately no longer align with the AM62x table. So create a new
> table with these new speed grades defined for the AM62Px
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index a80698f3cfe65..6c84562de5c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ enum {
>  #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_R_MPU_OPP		BIT(1)
>  #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_V_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
>  
> +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_O_MPU_OPP			15
> +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_S_MPU_OPP			19
> +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_U_MPU_OPP			21
> +
> +#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP		BIT(0)
> +#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_U_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
> +
>  #define VERSION_COUNT				2
>  
>  struct ti_cpufreq_data;
> @@ -134,6 +141,23 @@ static unsigned long omap3_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
>  	return BIT(efuse);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long am62p5_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
> +					unsigned long efuse)
> +{
> +	unsigned long calc_efuse = AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP;

This and he earlier patch, why not continue using the name convention
calculated_efuse like in am625 and dra ?

> +
> +	switch (efuse) {
> +	case AM62P5_EFUSE_U_MPU_OPP:
> +	case AM62P5_EFUSE_S_MPU_OPP:
> +		calc_efuse |= AM62P5_SUPPORT_U_MPU_OPP;
> +		fallthrough;
> +	case AM62P5_EFUSE_O_MPU_OPP:
> +		calc_efuse |= AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	return calc_efuse;
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long am62a7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
>  					unsigned long efuse)

Otherwise, Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Bryan Brattlof June 15, 2024, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On June 13, 2024 thus sayeth Dhruva Gole:
> On Jun 12, 2024 at 18:17:35 -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > More speed grades for the AM62Px SoC family have been defined which
> > unfortunately no longer align with the AM62x table. So create a new
> > table with these new speed grades defined for the AM62Px
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> > index a80698f3cfe65..6c84562de5c6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ enum {
> >  #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_R_MPU_OPP		BIT(1)
> >  #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_V_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
> >  
> > +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_O_MPU_OPP			15
> > +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_S_MPU_OPP			19
> > +#define AM62P5_EFUSE_U_MPU_OPP			21
> > +
> > +#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP		BIT(0)
> > +#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_U_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
> > +
> >  #define VERSION_COUNT				2
> >  
> >  struct ti_cpufreq_data;
> > @@ -134,6 +141,23 @@ static unsigned long omap3_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
> >  	return BIT(efuse);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned long am62p5_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
> > +					unsigned long efuse)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long calc_efuse = AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP;
> 
> This and he earlier patch, why not continue using the name convention
> calculated_efuse like in am625 and dra ?
>

For whatever reason I've been more of a minimalist when it comes to 
naming stack variables. Single letters are just as good as full 
sentences ;)

I'll use the full name next round

~Bryan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index a80698f3cfe65..6c84562de5c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,6 +69,13 @@  enum {
 #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_R_MPU_OPP		BIT(1)
 #define AM62A7_SUPPORT_V_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
 
+#define AM62P5_EFUSE_O_MPU_OPP			15
+#define AM62P5_EFUSE_S_MPU_OPP			19
+#define AM62P5_EFUSE_U_MPU_OPP			21
+
+#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP		BIT(0)
+#define AM62P5_SUPPORT_U_MPU_OPP		BIT(2)
+
 #define VERSION_COUNT				2
 
 struct ti_cpufreq_data;
@@ -134,6 +141,23 @@  static unsigned long omap3_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
 	return BIT(efuse);
 }
 
+static unsigned long am62p5_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
+					unsigned long efuse)
+{
+	unsigned long calc_efuse = AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP;
+
+	switch (efuse) {
+	case AM62P5_EFUSE_U_MPU_OPP:
+	case AM62P5_EFUSE_S_MPU_OPP:
+		calc_efuse |= AM62P5_SUPPORT_U_MPU_OPP;
+		fallthrough;
+	case AM62P5_EFUSE_O_MPU_OPP:
+		calc_efuse |= AM62P5_SUPPORT_O_MPU_OPP;
+	}
+
+	return calc_efuse;
+}
+
 static unsigned long am62a7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
 					unsigned long efuse)
 {
@@ -291,6 +315,15 @@  static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am62a7_soc_data = {
 	.multi_regulator = false,
 };
 
+static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am62p5_soc_data = {
+	.efuse_xlate = am62p5_efuse_xlate,
+	.efuse_offset = 0x0,
+	.efuse_mask = 0x07c0,
+	.efuse_shift = 0x6,
+	.rev_offset = 0x0014,
+	.multi_regulator = false,
+};
+
 /**
  * ti_cpufreq_get_efuse() - Parse and return efuse value present on SoC
  * @opp_data: pointer to ti_cpufreq_data context
@@ -395,7 +428,7 @@  static const struct of_device_id ti_cpufreq_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,omap36xx", .data = &omap36xx_soc_data, },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am625", .data = &am625_soc_data, },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am62a7", .data = &am62a7_soc_data, },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", .data = &am625_soc_data, },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", .data = &am62p5_soc_data, },
 	/* legacy */
 	{ .compatible = "ti,omap3430", .data = &omap34xx_soc_data, },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,omap3630", .data = &omap36xx_soc_data, },