| Message ID | 15263cb9bbc63d5cc66428e7438e0b5324306aa4.1718400508.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next,1/2] net: dsa: mt7530: factor out bridge join/leave logic | expand |
On 15/06/2024 01:21, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > Remove a pair of ports from the port matrix when both ports have the > isolated flag set. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net> > --- > drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c > index ecacaefdd694..44939379aba8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c > @@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state) > } > > static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, > - const struct net_device *bridge_dev, bool join) > + const struct net_device *bridge_dev, > + bool join) Run git clang-format on this patch as well please. > __must_hold(&priv->reg_mutex) > { > struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(priv->ds, port), *other_dp; > @@ -1311,6 +1312,7 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, > struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp; > u32 port_bitmap = BIT(cpu_dp->index); > int other_port; > + bool isolated; > > dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(other_dp, priv->ds) { > other_port = other_dp->index; > @@ -1327,7 +1329,9 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, > if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(other_dp, bridge_dev)) > continue; > > - if (join) { > + isolated = p->isolated && other_p->isolated; > + > + if (join && !isolated) { > other_p->pm |= PCR_MATRIX(BIT(port)); > port_bitmap |= BIT(other_port); > } else { Why must other_p->isolated be true as well? If I understand correctly, when a user port is isolated, non isolated ports can't communicate with it whilst the CPU port can. If I were to isolate a port which is the only isolated one at the moment, the isolated flag would not be true. Therefore, the isolated port would not be removed from the port matrix of other user ports. Why not only check for p->isolated? Arınç
On 16/06/2024 09:52, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > On 15/06/2024 01:21, Matthias Schiffer wrote: >> Remove a pair of ports from the port matrix when both ports have the >> isolated flag set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net> >> --- >> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> index ecacaefdd694..44939379aba8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> @@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state) >> } >> static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> - const struct net_device *bridge_dev, bool join) >> + const struct net_device *bridge_dev, >> + bool join) > > Run git clang-format on this patch as well please. > >> __must_hold(&priv->reg_mutex) >> { >> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(priv->ds, port), *other_dp; >> @@ -1311,6 +1312,7 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp; >> u32 port_bitmap = BIT(cpu_dp->index); >> int other_port; >> + bool isolated; >> dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(other_dp, priv->ds) { >> other_port = other_dp->index; >> @@ -1327,7 +1329,9 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(other_dp, bridge_dev)) >> continue; >> - if (join) { >> + isolated = p->isolated && other_p->isolated; >> + >> + if (join && !isolated) { >> other_p->pm |= PCR_MATRIX(BIT(port)); >> port_bitmap |= BIT(other_port); >> } else { > > Why must other_p->isolated be true as well? If I understand correctly, when > a user port is isolated, non isolated ports can't communicate with it > whilst the CPU port can. If I were to isolate a port which is the only > isolated one at the moment, the isolated flag would not be true. Therefore, > the isolated port would not be removed from the port matrix of other user > ports. Why not only check for p->isolated? The concept of port isolation is that the isolated port can only communicate with non-isolated ports so the current implementation looks ok. Which switch models did you test this on; MT7530, MT7531, MT7988 SoC switch? I will test it on MT7530 and MT7531 tomorrow evening. Arınç
On 16/06/2024 08:52, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > On 15/06/2024 01:21, Matthias Schiffer wrote: >> Remove a pair of ports from the port matrix when both ports have the >> isolated flag set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net> >> --- >> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> index ecacaefdd694..44939379aba8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c >> @@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int >> port, u8 state) >> } >> static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> - const struct net_device *bridge_dev, bool join) >> + const struct net_device *bridge_dev, >> + bool join) > > Run git clang-format on this patch as well please. Oops, will do. > >> __must_hold(&priv->reg_mutex) >> { >> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(priv->ds, port), *other_dp; >> @@ -1311,6 +1312,7 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct >> mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp; >> u32 port_bitmap = BIT(cpu_dp->index); >> int other_port; >> + bool isolated; >> dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(other_dp, priv->ds) { >> other_port = other_dp->index; >> @@ -1327,7 +1329,9 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct >> mt7530_priv *priv, int port, >> if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(other_dp, bridge_dev)) >> continue; >> - if (join) { >> + isolated = p->isolated && other_p->isolated; >> + >> + if (join && !isolated) { >> other_p->pm |= PCR_MATRIX(BIT(port)); >> port_bitmap |= BIT(other_port); >> } else { > > Why must other_p->isolated be true as well? If I understand correctly, when > a user port is isolated, non isolated ports can't communicate with it > whilst the CPU port can. If I were to isolate a port which is the only > isolated one at the moment, the isolated flag would not be true. Therefore, > the isolated port would not be removed from the port matrix of other user > ports. Why not only check for p->isolated? As far as I can tell, the rules are: - non-isolated ports can communicate with every port - isolated ports can't communicate with other isolated ports - communication is symmetric You'll find that the logic works the same for non-offloaded bridge forwarding (see should_deliver() in net/bridge/br_forward.c and br_skb_isolated() in net/bridge/br_private.h). Matthias
> As far as I can tell, the rules are: > > - non-isolated ports can communicate with every port > - isolated ports can't communicate with other isolated ports > - communication is symmetric It is a bit more subtle than that. By default, all ports should be isolated. They can exchange packets with the CPU port, but nothing else. This goes back to the model of switches just look like a bunch of netdev interfaces. By default, linux netdev interfaces are standalone. You need to add a bridge before packets can flow between ports. Once you add a bridge, ports within that bridge can exchange packets. However, there can be multiple bridges. So a port needs to be isolated from ports in another bridge, but non-isolated to ports within the same bridge. Andrew
On 16/06/2024 17:35, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> As far as I can tell, the rules are: >> >> - non-isolated ports can communicate with every port >> - isolated ports can't communicate with other isolated ports >> - communication is symmetric > > It is a bit more subtle than that. > > By default, all ports should be isolated. They can exchange packets > with the CPU port, but nothing else. This goes back to the model of > switches just look like a bunch of netdev interfaces. By default, > linux netdev interfaces are standalone. You need to add a bridge > before packets can flow between ports. > > Once you add a bridge, ports within that bridge can exchange > packets. However, there can be multiple bridges. So a port needs to be > isolated from ports in another bridge, but non-isolated to ports > within the same bridge. > > Andrew Right, I was talking about ports in the same bridge (which is already handled as expected by the mt7530 driver, just the option to set the isolation flag for individual bridge ports was unsupported). Matthias
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c index ecacaefdd694..44939379aba8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c @@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state) } static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, - const struct net_device *bridge_dev, bool join) + const struct net_device *bridge_dev, + bool join) __must_hold(&priv->reg_mutex) { struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(priv->ds, port), *other_dp; @@ -1311,6 +1312,7 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp; u32 port_bitmap = BIT(cpu_dp->index); int other_port; + bool isolated; dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(other_dp, priv->ds) { other_port = other_dp->index; @@ -1327,7 +1329,9 @@ static void mt7530_update_port_member(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int port, if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(other_dp, bridge_dev)) continue; - if (join) { + isolated = p->isolated && other_p->isolated; + + if (join && !isolated) { other_p->pm |= PCR_MATRIX(BIT(port)); port_bitmap |= BIT(other_port); } else { @@ -1352,7 +1356,7 @@ mt7530_port_pre_bridge_flags(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { if (flags.mask & ~(BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD | - BR_BCAST_FLOOD)) + BR_BCAST_FLOOD | BR_ISOLATED)) return -EINVAL; return 0; @@ -1381,6 +1385,17 @@ mt7530_port_bridge_flags(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, mt7530_rmw(priv, MT753X_MFC, BC_FFP(BIT(port)), flags.val & BR_BCAST_FLOOD ? BC_FFP(BIT(port)) : 0); + if (flags.mask & BR_ISOLATED) { + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port); + struct net_device *bridge_dev = dsa_port_bridge_dev_get(dp); + + priv->ports[port].isolated = !!(flags.val & BR_ISOLATED); + + mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex); + mt7530_update_port_member(priv, port, bridge_dev, true); + mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex); + } + return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h index 2ea4e24628c6..28592123070b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h @@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ struct mt7530_fdb { */ struct mt7530_port { bool enable; + bool isolated; u32 pm; u16 pvid; struct phylink_pcs *sgmii_pcs;
Remove a pair of ports from the port matrix when both ports have the isolated flag set. Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net> --- drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)