diff mbox series

[v3,1/5] KVM: Reject overly excessive IDs in KVM_CREATE_VCPU

Message ID 20240614202859.3597745-2-minipli@grsecurity.net (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Reject vCPU IDs above 2^32 | expand

Commit Message

Mathias Krause June 14, 2024, 8:28 p.m. UTC
If, on a 64 bit system, a vCPU ID is provided that has the upper 32 bits
set to a non-zero value, it may get accepted if the truncated to 32 bits
integer value is below KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS and 'max_vcpus'. This feels very
wrong and triggered the reporting logic of PaX's SIZE_OVERFLOW plugin.

Instead of silently truncating and accepting such values, pass the full
value to kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() and make the existing limit checks
return an error.

Even if this is a userland ABI breaking change, no sane userland could
have ever relied on that behaviour.

Reported-by: PaX's SIZE_OVERFLOW plugin running on grsecurity's syzkaller
Fixes: 6aa8b732ca01 ("[PATCH] kvm: userspace interface")
Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
Cc: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Sean Christopherson June 18, 2024, 9:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, Mathias Krause wrote:
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 14841acb8b95..b04e87f6568f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4200,12 +4200,20 @@ static void kvm_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  /*
>   * Creates some virtual cpus.  Good luck creating more than one.
>   */
> -static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
> +static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long id)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * KVM tracks vCPU IDs as 'int', be kind to userspace and reject
> +	 * too-large values instead of silently truncating.
> +	 *
> +	 * Also ensure we're not breaking this assumption by accidentally
> +	 * pushing KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS above INT_MAX.

I tweaked this slightly because it's not just accidental changes we need to
guard against, and to "hint" that vcpu_id really should be an "unsigned int".

	/*
	 * KVM tracks vCPU IDs as 'int', be kind to userspace and reject
	 * too-large values instead of silently truncating.
	 *
	 * Ensure KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS isn't pushed above INT_MAX without first
	 * changing the storage type (at the very least, IDs should be tracked
	 * as unsigned ints).
	 */

> +	 */
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS > INT_MAX);
>  	if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 14841acb8b95..b04e87f6568f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -4200,12 +4200,20 @@  static void kvm_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /*
  * Creates some virtual cpus.  Good luck creating more than one.
  */
-static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
+static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long id)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct page *page;
 
+	/*
+	 * KVM tracks vCPU IDs as 'int', be kind to userspace and reject
+	 * too-large values instead of silently truncating.
+	 *
+	 * Also ensure we're not breaking this assumption by accidentally
+	 * pushing KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS above INT_MAX.
+	 */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS > INT_MAX);
 	if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS)
 		return -EINVAL;