| Message ID | 20240621115708.3626-10-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [01/11] t: move reftable/record_test.c to the unit testing framework | expand |
Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> writes: > reftable_record_is_deletion() is a function defined in > reftable/record.{c, h} that determines whether a record is of > type deletion or not. In the current testing setup, this function Nit: 'In the current testing setup' holds true for the series, but on a commit level, this statement needs to be modified with each tackled type. > is left untested for all the four record types (ref, log, obj, index). > > Add tests for this function in the case of index records. > Note that since index records cannot be of type deletion, this function > must always return '0' when called on an index record. > > Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> > Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> > Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> > --- > t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c > index 766431ca67..99ebfafe0b 100644 > --- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c > +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c > @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ static void test_reftable_index_record_roundtrip(void) > reftable_record_key(&in, &key); > test_copy(&in); > > + check(!reftable_record_is_deletion(&in)); > check(!strbuf_cmp(&key, &in.u.idx.last_key)); > n = reftable_record_encode(&in, dest, GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ); > check_int(n, >, 0); > -- > 2.45.2.404.g9eaef5822c
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 14:49, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote: > > Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> writes: > > > reftable_record_is_deletion() is a function defined in > > reftable/record.{c, h} that determines whether a record is of > > type deletion or not. In the current testing setup, this function > > Nit: 'In the current testing setup' holds true for the series, but on a > commit level, this statement needs to be modified with each tackled > type. I'm not quite sure I follow. Could you explain this a bit further?
Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 14:49, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > reftable_record_is_deletion() is a function defined in >> > reftable/record.{c, h} that determines whether a record is of >> > type deletion or not. In the current testing setup, this function >> >> Nit: 'In the current testing setup' holds true for the series, but on a >> commit level, this statement needs to be modified with each tackled >> type. > > I'm not quite sure I follow. Could you explain this a bit further? Patch 06/11 says "In the current testing setup, this function is left untested for all the four record types (ref, log, obj, index)." then it proceeds to add tests for the 'index' type. However 07/11 still says "In the current testing setup, this function is left untested for all the four record types (ref, log, obj, index).", which is no longer the state. Since we tackled 'index' in the previous commit. So forth for the next two commits.
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c index 766431ca67..99ebfafe0b 100644 --- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ static void test_reftable_index_record_roundtrip(void) reftable_record_key(&in, &key); test_copy(&in); + check(!reftable_record_is_deletion(&in)); check(!strbuf_cmp(&key, &in.u.idx.last_key)); n = reftable_record_encode(&in, dest, GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ); check_int(n, >, 0);
reftable_record_is_deletion() is a function defined in reftable/record.{c, h} that determines whether a record is of type deletion or not. In the current testing setup, this function is left untested for all the four record types (ref, log, obj, index). Add tests for this function in the case of index records. Note that since index records cannot be of type deletion, this function must always return '0' when called on an index record. Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> --- t/unit-tests/t-reftable-record.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)