Message ID | pull.1746.v2.git.1718834285.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mktree: support more flexible usage | expand |
"Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > The goal of this series is to make 'git mktree' a much more flexible and > powerful tool for constructing arbitrary trees in memory without the use of > an index or worktree. I've read earlier parts of this series carefully (but didn't manage to get to the end of it), and I saw Patrick and Eric gave reviews on the earlier round, but otherwise this topic seems to have stalled. https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1746.v2.git.1718834285.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ Any more comments? Otherwise, if I find time to read through 13-17/17 and did not find anything glaringly wrong, I am planning to mark the topic ready for 'next'. Thanks.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > "Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > >> The goal of this series is to make 'git mktree' a much more flexible and >> powerful tool for constructing arbitrary trees in memory without the use of >> an index or worktree. > > I've read earlier parts of this series carefully (but didn't manage > to get to the end of it), and I saw Patrick and Eric gave reviews on > the earlier round, but otherwise this topic seems to have stalled. > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1746.v2.git.1718834285.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ > > Any more comments? > > Otherwise, if I find time to read through 13-17/17 and did not find > anything glaringly wrong, I am planning to mark the topic ready for > 'next'. Thanks. And I had a few review comments myself. Then the topic stalled. I am not ready to mark the topic ready for 'next' in this state. THanks.