Message ID | 20240725133932.739936-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: dts: renesas: Correct GICD and GICR sizes | expand |
Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:41 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > The RZ/G2L SoC is equipped with the GIC-600. The GICD + GICDA is 128kB, > and the GICR is 128kB per CPU. > > Fixes: 68a45525297b2 ("arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's") > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Thanks for your patch! > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > @@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > #address-cells = <0>; > interrupt-controller; > - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, > - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>; > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > }; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > index 9cf27ca9f1d2..6f4d4dc13f50 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus { > /delete-node/ cpu@100; > }; > }; > + > +&gic { > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>; > +}; What's the point of overriding this here? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert, On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:53 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:41 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > The RZ/G2L SoC is equipped with the GIC-600. The GICD + GICDA is 128kB, > > and the GICR is 128kB per CPU. > > > > Fixes: 68a45525297b2 ("arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's") > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > Thanks for your patch! > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > @@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { > > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > #address-cells = <0>; > > interrupt-controller; > > - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, > > - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>; > > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > > }; > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > index 9cf27ca9f1d2..6f4d4dc13f50 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus { > > /delete-node/ cpu@100; > > }; > > }; > > + > > +&gic { > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>; > > +}; > > What's the point of overriding this here? > Are you suggesting we drop this, as we have no users for it currently? Cheers, Prabhakar
Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:59 PM Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:53 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:41 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > The RZ/G2L SoC is equipped with the GIC-600. The GICD + GICDA is 128kB, > > > and the GICR is 128kB per CPU. > > > > > > Fixes: 68a45525297b2 ("arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's") > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > > @@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { > > > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > > #address-cells = <0>; > > > interrupt-controller; > > > - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, > > > - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; > > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>; > > > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > > > }; > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > index 9cf27ca9f1d2..6f4d4dc13f50 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus { > > > /delete-node/ cpu@100; > > > }; > > > }; > > > + > > > +&gic { > > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>; > > > +}; > > > > What's the point of overriding this here? > > > Are you suggesting we drop this, as we have no users for it currently? I didn't mean to drop it because we have no users of r9a07g044l1.dtsi. I am just wondering what would be the side-effect of not overriding it? After all, all r9a07g044 SoC variants have the same GIC hardware block? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert, On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:07 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:59 PM Lad, Prabhakar > <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:53 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:41 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > > > The RZ/G2L SoC is equipped with the GIC-600. The GICD + GICDA is 128kB, > > > > and the GICR is 128kB per CPU. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 68a45525297b2 ("arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's") > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > > > @@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { > > > > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > > > #address-cells = <0>; > > > > interrupt-controller; > > > > - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, > > > > - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; > > > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>; > > > > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > > index 9cf27ca9f1d2..6f4d4dc13f50 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > > > @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus { > > > > /delete-node/ cpu@100; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > + > > > > +&gic { > > > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, > > > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>; > > > > +}; > > > > > > What's the point of overriding this here? > > > > > Are you suggesting we drop this, as we have no users for it currently? > > I didn't mean to drop it because we have no users of r9a07g044l1.dtsi. > I am just wondering what would be the side-effect of not overriding it? Not sure what side-effects we would see, maybe the IRQ maintainers can comment on it. > After all, all r9a07g044 SoC variants have the same GIC hardware block? > I would assume so, I dont have a r9a07g044l1 SoC to verify it. Maybe I will drop this until it's verified. Cheers, Prabhakar
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi index d3838e5820fc..c9b9b60a3a36 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi @@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { #interrupt-cells = <3>; #address-cells = <0>; interrupt-controller; - reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, - <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x40000>; interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi index 9cf27ca9f1d2..6f4d4dc13f50 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ cpus { /delete-node/ cpu@100; }; }; + +&gic { + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x20000>, + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x20000>; +};